FEC's docs concerning the NY Post's laptop story and the hacked materials policy

AProudLefty

AProudLefty

The remora of JPP
Contributor
Twitter states that it (1) blocked users from sharing links to and posting certain information from the New York Post articles relating to hacked and personal information

As relevant here, Twitter’s policies include the following:
10 Distribution of Hacked Materials Policy. Prohibits users from
11 distributing hacked materials, including by posting hacked content directly
12 or by linking to hacked content hosted on other websites, but provides that
13 users “can discuss a hack that has taken place.”

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7868/7868_10.pdf

The agency also found no evidence that Twitter coordinated its response with the Biden campaign. Twitter’s head of U.S. public policy Lauren Culbertson said in a sworn declaration that she did not know of any contact with the campaign prior to the decisions.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html

Poor Dr. InExcessivePain. His gastrointestinal pains must be enormous. Perhaps some horse paste and ExLax will help? :dunno:
 
AProudLefty said:
Twitter states that it (1) blocked users from sharing links to and posting certain information from the New York Post articles relating to hacked and personal information

As relevant here, Twitter’s policies include the following:
10 Distribution of Hacked Materials Policy. Prohibits users from
11 distributing hacked materials, including by posting hacked content directly
12 or by linking to hacked content hosted on other websites, but provides that
13 users “can discuss a hack that has taken place.”

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7868/7868_10.pdf

The agency also found no evidence that Twitter coordinated its response with the Biden campaign. Twitter’s head of U.S. public policy Lauren Culbertson said in a sworn declaration that she did not know of any contact with the campaign prior to the decisions.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html

Poor Dr. InExcessivePain. His gastrointestinal pains must be enormous. Perhaps some horse paste and ExLax will help? :dunno:
Click to expand...

And when did the FEC decide this? Before or After Musk released the evidence last night? :laugh: I can smell the desperation on you. :laugh:
 
AProudLefty said:
Twitter states that it (1) blocked users from sharing links to and posting certain information from the New York Post articles relating to hacked and personal information

As relevant here, Twitter’s policies include the following:
10 Distribution of Hacked Materials Policy. Prohibits users from
11 distributing hacked materials, including by posting hacked content directly
12 or by linking to hacked content hosted on other websites, but provides that
13 users “can discuss a hack that has taken place.”

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7868/7868_10.pdf

The agency also found no evidence that Twitter coordinated its response with the Biden campaign. Twitter’s head of U.S. public policy Lauren Culbertson said in a sworn declaration that she did not know of any contact with the campaign prior to the decisions.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/15/twi...tricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html

Poor Dr. InExcessivePain. His gastrointestinal pains must be enormous. Perhaps some horse paste and ExLax will help? :dunno:
Click to expand...
Exlax and his sidekick the cuck are conflating two very different stories.

Nobody denies that Hunter was a typical wealthy drug addict who had access to entirely too much money. He was a horrible family man, and a horrible husband.

The Post claimed that there was proof that money was funneled to Joe Biden, which is a lie.

As such, Twitter was correct to block links to the Post.

Musk has single handedly made Twitter a loss leader, now that the only ads you see are for pillows.
 
ExpressLane said:
And when did the FEC decide this? Before or After Musk released the evidence last night? :laugh: I can smell the desperation on you. :laugh:
Click to expand...

So desperate that this ^ guy couldn't see the date on the document.

giphy.gif
 
As many of us have long suspected, there were back channels between Twitter and the Biden 2020 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to ban critics or remove negative stories. Those seeking to discuss the scandal were simply “handled,” and nothing else had to be said.

Ultimately, the New York Post was suspended from Twitter for reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. Twitter even blocked users from sharing the Post’s story by using a tool designed for child pornography. Even Trump White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany was suspended for linking to the scandal.
Click to expand...
https://thehill.com/opinion/judicia...-musks-document-dump-could-be-a-game-changer/
 
Althea said:
Exlax and his sidekick the cuck are conflating two very different stories.

Nobody denies that Hunter was a typical wealthy drug addict who had access to entirely too much money. He was a horrible family man, and a horrible husband.

The Post claimed that there was proof that money was funneled to Joe Biden, which is a lie.

As such, Twitter was correct to block links to the Post.

Musk has single handedly made Twitter a loss leader, now that the only ads you see are for pillows.
Click to expand...
The story RIGHT now is did the DNC request valuable services from Twitter to aid the Biden Campaign. The answer is an undeniable yes they did. Those services are in fact in kind contributions
 
ExpressLane said:
The story RIGHT now is did the DNC request valuable services from Twitter to aid the Biden Campaign. The answer is an undeniable yes they did. Those services are in fact in kind contributions
Click to expand...
Nope. I know you want the story to be that...but it simply isn't.

I thought you said the govt. demanded that social media [sic] censure Twitter?
 
AProudLefty said:
Says the guy who couldn't even see the date on the document.
Click to expand...
LOL

"This happened"


'No...no it didn't'


"Well then...that happened"

'No...that didn't happen either'


"Well it might have happened"

'No...it didn't happen at all'.


"YOU HAVE READING COMPREHENSION ISSUES!"
 
AProudLefty said:
It has not dawned on him that the "censorship" happened during the Trump admin. :rofl2:

Pure comedy.
Click to expand...
He was posting while watching Tuckems in real time.

Every time we kicked his ass with facts, he had to change the story.

First it was the govt., until we force fed him the fact that Biden wasn't POTUS yet.
 
AProudLefty said:
Says the guy who couldn't even see the date on the document.

giphy.gif
Click to expand...
I was just pointing out to you the absurdity of the FEC decision. They obviously couldn't have seen the evidence and produced a report since it was just released last evening. Your posting it like it was significant was amusing though. Thanks

:magagrin:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top