Interracial couple denied marriage license in La.

Hypocrisy. Points for me. :)

Not at all. Yours was a personal attack. Mine was pointing out the hypocrisy of your statement.

So, either you don't get those points or I get them too. :rofl:

Gee its fun making you look foolish.
 
Not at all. Yours was a personal attack. Mine was pointing out the hypocrisy of your statement.

So, either you don't get those points or I get them too. :rofl:

Gee its fun making you look foolish.
Arguing with you and Blackie is like arguing with little kids sometimes: logic disappears and you too resort to giggling with each other. This is clearly one of those times.
 
Last edited:
Arguing with you and Blackie is like arguing with little kids sometimes: logic disappears and you too resort to giggling with each other. This is clearly one of those times.

Right because its logical to refuse to examine evidence in a link because its 39 pages without a search feature.

Interesting logic you have there.
 
Oh I forgot. In your world, accusations require no proof.

Still don't get it do you?

I don't have to prove shit to you .. but there re people here who I respect and they should know I've never used such racist language. ID lied when she said I did .. I proved .. to the people I respect .. that she is a liar.

You aren't in the group I respect, thus, who gives a fuck what you think?

:0)
 
Still don't get it do you?

I don't have to prove shit to you .. but there re people here who I respect and they should know I've never used such racist language. ID lied when she said I did .. I proved .. to the people I respect .. that she is a liar.

You aren't in the group I respect, thus, who gives a fuck what you think?

:0)
Obviously you aren't in the group that ID respects, so again, you laid out specific rules for backing up assertions which she is now following, yet you whine about it. That's called hypocrisy.
 
Post 150.

LMAO! You must be lost in your own little world. A 39 page memo would be accepted as evidence in any court. In fact, if you only submitted the relevant passages it would get thrown out. The courts require that an entire document be presented if passages are used as evidence.

The court may require that you annotate which passages are relevant.

But you are still refusing to read the evidence presented. It is not my problem that you are lazy. Neither is it my responsibility to spoon feed the information to you.
 
That's what I'm requiring you to do. I'll wait.

You claim to have an intellect, and yet you continue to try and disprove it.

Ok, so you didn't read the entire document. But now it is obvious that you did not even scroll down a few pages. You simply looked for the "Search" function, and when it wasn't there you quit and started harrassing me for your failings.

You are a waste of time. Let me know when you have something valid to say.
 
You claim to have an intellect, and yet you continue to try and disprove it.

Ok, so you didn't read the entire document. But now it is obvious that you did not even scroll down a few pages. You simply looked for the "Search" function, and when it wasn't there you quit and started harrassing me for your failings.

You are a waste of time. Let me know when you have something valid to say.
Let me know when you want to back up you claims with something specific. :)
 
Interestingly, the Gov. of Louisiana is calling for the Justice of the Peace to be disciplined. I think most of state is embarrassed by those man's breaking of the law.
 
Back
Top