Interracial couple denied marriage license in La.

blackascoal said:
You're a moron so I don't expect you to get it.

YOU are a racist and (here's the part that you don't get) .. I DON"T GIVE A FUCK WHETHER YOU PUBLICLY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT OR NOT

Racists are scum and they rarely acknowledge their evil .. ie; Limpy.

I'm not going to engage your idiocy of "proof" when you never acknowledge any proof of your mindless statements. I don't have to prove shit to you.

YOU prove yourself a racist.
Click to expand...
Again you offer no proof just baseless declarations and, as expected, claims that the burden of proof is not yours. :)
 
WinterBorn said:
You keep trying to support your unwillingness to read a paper by trying to sound like you know what I would or wouldn't do.

I provided a link, as you asked. There is plenty of evidence in this link, if you would only read it. Now either argue about the contents of the link or don't. But this bullshit dancing is a waste of time.

Let me know when you have something new and relevant to say.
Click to expand...
Again, your link refers to a 39 page document and claims it provides evidence. Where is such evidence, specifically? Either you haven't read it so can't point it out or you have read it and it is not there. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, and that is you.
 
Southern Man said:
Again you offer no proof just baseless declarations and, as expected, claims that the burden of proof is not yours. :)
Click to expand...

Strange, you left "blackie" out of your post proclaiming your innocence.

I don't have to "prove" shit to you or even talk to your worthless ass. You are known here as a racist.

At least have the balls of topspin. He acknowledges that he's a racist .. doesn't make him smell any better .. just means he has more honesty than you.

go away .. you stank
 
blackascoal said:
Strange, you left "blackie" out of your post proclaiming your innocence.

I don't have to "prove" shit to you or even talk to your worthless ass. You are known here as a racist.

At least have the balls of topspin. He acknowledges that he's a racist .. doesn't make him smell any better .. just means he has more honesty than you.

go away .. you stank
Click to expand...
You call yourself black as coal and I have therefore given you the nickname of Blackie. That may make me insensitive, and since it bothers you it proves you hyper-sensitive, which of course gives me the incentive to keep using it over and over until you have a hissy fit. But that's not the same as racism.

Try again. :)
 
Southern Man said:
Again, your link refers to a 39 page document and claims it provides evidence. Where is such evidence, specifically? Either you haven't read it so can't point it out or you have read it and it is not there. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, and that is you.
Click to expand...

You asked for proof and I provided it. The fact that you have wasted more time posting arguments about why you shouldn't have to read the 39 page document than it would take to read the document is not my problems.

As I said, let me know if you have anything new and relevant to say.
 
blackascoal said:
Strange, you left "blackie" out of your post proclaiming your innocence.

I don't have to "prove" shit to you or even talk to your worthless ass. You are known here as a racist.

At least have the balls of topspin. He acknowledges that he's a racist .. doesn't make him smell any better .. just means he has more honesty than you.

go away .. you stank
Click to expand...

wtf where did I do that???
 
Southern Man said:
You call yourself black as coal and I have therefore given you the nickname of Blackie. That may make me insensitive, and since it bothers you it proves you hyper-sensitive, which of course gives me the incentive to keep using it over and over until you have a hissy fit. But that's not the same as racism.

Try again. :)
Click to expand...

Yes, and hypocritical since he has no problem using terms like "whitey" and "cracker" towards white people he does not like.
 
WinterBorn said:
You asked for proof and I provided it. The fact that you have wasted more time posting arguments about why you shouldn't have to read the 39 page document than it would take to read the document is not my problems.

As I said, let me know if you have anything new and relevant to say.
Click to expand...
Again, the burden of proof is on you. Toss a 39 page document in front of any judge and he'll toss it back to you and ask you to turn the pages and show him specifically, which is exactly what I'm doing.

Since you've been so focused at trying to win a debate over several months only to fail every time here's your chance.
 
Southern Man said:
Of course not and neither did you; it's not my responsibility to read 39 pages of unsearchable pdf to prove your point for you. Sorry.
Click to expand...

True, if he has read it and knows there is proof there he should say page? and paragraph?.

BTW~~~ check this out:
According to a report from the state's auditor general and a Detroit News investigation, Michigan fails to keep tabs on teachers convicted of sexual assault and other crimes. More than 200 licensed school workers in Michigan had criminal records in 2004, and the state didn't know about 178 of them.

In addition, the state often failed to revoke the certification of teachers found guilty of crimes--including, according to the Lansing State Journal, Matthew Mankoff, a band teacher in Deckerville found guilty of soliciting sex from a minor in 2003, and William Ayler, a Detroit teacher who pleaded guilty in 1997 to one count of second-degree sexual assault.
 
Ice Dancer said:
True, if he has read it and knows there is proof there he should say page? and paragraph?.

BTW~~~ check this out:
According to a report from the state's auditor general and a Detroit News investigation, Michigan fails to keep tabs on teachers convicted of sexual assault and other crimes. More than 200 licensed school workers in Michigan had criminal records in 2004, and the state didn't know about 178 of them.

In addition, the state often failed to revoke the certification of teachers found guilty of crimes--including, according to the Lansing State Journal, Matthew Mankoff, a band teacher in Deckerville found guilty of soliciting sex from a minor in 2003, and William Ayler, a Detroit teacher who pleaded guilty in 1997 to one count of second-degree sexual assault.
Click to expand...

It looks like Solitary, er, "Winterborn" was full of shit on his earlier assertion as well. It amazes me how this guy spends so much time here, even reading posts of mine that were written months before he joined here, yet seems to learn nothing.
 
Southern Man said:
It looks like Solitary, er, "Winterborn" was full of shit on his earlier assertion as well. It amazes me how this guy spends so much time here, even reading posts of mine that were written months before he joined here, yet seems to learn nothing.
Click to expand...

Coming from someone who cannot read a 39 page memo, that is laughable.
 
What happened ID?

Having difficulty finding that bullshit?

Here's a tip .. you won't find it. I've been here for years .. never intimated that bullshit.

YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR.
 
Southern Man said:
It looks like Solitary, er, "Winterborn" was full of shit on his earlier assertion as well. It amazes me how this guy spends so much time here, even reading posts of mine that were written months before he joined here, yet seems to learn nothing.
Click to expand...

Now his position is that YOU didn't read the 39 page file that he obviously did not read either, though he used it as proof.
 
Southern Man said:
It looks like Solitary, er, "Winterborn" was full of shit on his earlier assertion as well. It amazes me how this guy spends so much time here, even reading posts of mine that were written months before he joined here, yet seems to learn nothing.
Click to expand...

Argumentum ad hominem


Points for me.
 
blackascoal said:
What happened ID?

Having difficulty finding that bullshit?

Here's a tip .. you won't find it. I've been here for years .. never intimated that bullshit.

YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR.
Click to expand...
She appears to be playing by rules that you established for yourself: making a accusation of racism doesn't require proof. How's that working for you now? :)
 
Ice Dancer said:
Now his position is that YOU didn't read the 39 page file that he obviously did not read either, though he used it as proof.
Click to expand...

He admitted he did not read the memo. I did read the memo. But it is not my responsibility to spoon-feed SM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top