Hello pansy ass pussy with the largest ignore list on JPP,
Sounds like straw-grasping. Those things were not on the minds of most voters.
Voters were largely irrelevant in the 2022 midterm (s)elections.
No, Democrats did not steal the election.
What "election" are you talking about?
That is absurd. If Democrats were going to steal an election, why would it result in a possible loss of the House?
... because Democrats didn't print/distribute/harvest/adjudicate enough ballots in enough House races because in those cases they couldn't find a mathematically possible way to fraud themselves the "win".
Republicans lost because they failed to convince voters they had the better approach.
WRONG. Republicans "lost" various races because they failed to print/distribute/harvest/adjudicate enough ballots in those races. Voters are largely irrelevant nowadays. That's why Democrats don't even bother to campaign, hold rallies, or participate in debates anymore. They just hide in their basements. All that matters now in numerous states is ballots, no matter how legitimate or illegitimate they are.
If Republicans fail to accept this cold hard truth, and fail to make the necessary changes in their strategies in order to overcome this, then they will never win at a statewide level in numerous states ever again, as the Democrat will always be (s)elected in the end, even if it takes weeks to dream up a mathematical way in which they can "find" enough ballots for said Democrat to "win".
The majority of Republican messaging was negative and there just wasn't enough offered about how Republicans might do things differently to get better results.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, you are FUNNY!!!!!
Voters understand Democrats did not cause inflation nor crime.
Voters understand that Democrats DID cause those things. That's why they voted against Democrats. However, Democrats happened to print/distribute/harvest/adjudicate more ballots than Republicans did, hence Democrats acquired MANY more seats than they should have acquired in the 2022 midterm (s)elections.
They appreciate all the accomplishments of Democrats such as infrastructure.
What infrastructure accomplishments?
Voters also were concerned about Republican extreme abortion positions and protecting democracy.
Voters weren't concerned about either of those things. Being responsible with children is not extreme. Murdering one's own offspring for sake of convenience IS extreme. There is no "democracy" to protect, as the USA was never a democracy. That's just a stupid buzzword.
They didn't want to give election-deniers control over election outcomes.
Election-deniers ARE controlling (s)election outcomes atm. They hold (s)elections because they deny the constitution that calls for elections to be held, hence they are denying elections (in addition to their quarter of a decade-long recent history of denying election results).
And just look at the pathetic Senate candidate in GA.
I agree. Warnock IS quite pathetic! He's a pastor who denies what the Bible says about the sanctity of human life.
They guy can't even speak English with proper grammar.
All the libtards on this forum cannot speak English, let alone speak it with proper grammar.
He is unqualified to be a US Senator,
A lie. See the constitution.
running on name recognition alone.
Another lie. Check out his platform.
Also, with a very checkered past.
Everybody (outside of Jesus Christ) has a "very checkered past". We all have the same problem of sin, dude. That's why we need Jesus Christ.
It is an embarrassment to the Republican party to run candidates like that and election-deniers.
Nah. What's embarrassing is running candidates with brain damage, dementia, and other health problems that impede their ability to perform their job requirements. The fact that Democrat voters (yes, they exist, even though the Democrat Party no longer makes any appeals to their votes anymore because there's no need for them to do so at this point) are willing to vote for said candidates is even more pathetic.