MORE right-wing political violence. 1930s Germany, here we come.

[Saint Guinefort]

Smarmy smug dumbass lacks self-awareness too.

While you were STRUGGLING to get your GED I was getting actual university degrees.

Speaking of which: I'm really sorry that the GED didn't pan out for you. I'm sure, tho', that you are the absolute BEST janitor your particular Denny's has EVER seen! Go Truth Detector! Mop that floor! Yaaaaayyyyy!

 

[zymurgy]

When you typed this out, did it REALLY sound intelligent to you? Yeah, I bet it did. Because you know YOU=GOOD, everyone who disagree with you=BAAAAAAAAD EEEEBIL SOCIALIST MARXIST MONSTER!

You're a moron.

when you got triggered by his accurate assessment and replied with seemingly random capitalized words, did it make you feel better?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

...and your point is?

The fact that our nation is descending into madness and both sides are getting in the game doesn't make it "better". You can "own the libs" all day long but that isn't how societies survive.

But don't worry, the Right Wing Body Count is still higher.

While I generally don't go after a source, I will this time. But I will also provide more than ad hominem to prove their gross bias and lies.

The Investigative Fund is a 501(c)(3) non-profit associated with the radical Leftist, Socialist The Nation magazine. It publishes its "research" almost exclusively in radical Leftist publications.
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-...that obstruct women’s access to health care.”

It produces almost exclusively, usually as part of Type, research that supports radical Leftist ideas.

https://www.typeinvestigations.org/reporter/theinvestigativefund/

That said, The Investigative Fund's (TIF) numbers are at best completely made up, at worst ludicrous fantasy.

In 2017 there were 3,939 credible threats against Congress versus 9,625 in 2021 that were investigated.
https://www.usnews.com/news/top-new...ox-threats-and-attacks-on-members-of-congress

Statistia shows that TIF's numbers are way off from actual:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/591079/number-of-terrorist-attacks-in-united-states/

Politifact, another source biased badly to the Left had this graphic published in the Washington Post, the same paper cited above:

Again, the numbers vary wildly from what TIF claims.

Interestingly, it appears that Leftists are their own worst enemy...

The radical Leftist magazine Vox produced a hack story using the same graphic as the WaPo. Their article is poorly researched and badly biased too.

White American men are a bigger domestic terrorist threat than Muslim foreigners

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/10/2/16396612/las-vegas-mass-shooting-terrorism-islam

For instance in it, the authors imply that the Las Vegas shooter (2017) was somehow a radical Rightwing nutjob when there is ZERO evidence that is the case. In fact, many of the cases they cite, they imply were by radicals on the Right when there is no solid evidence of that. Instead, they need a body count so they toss in whatever they can to raise it. The article is full of shit.

The same goes for the PNAS and DOJ articles when you dive into who wrote them and the actual research. These were biased to favor a pre-determined outcome rather than being objective.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

when you got triggered by his accurate assessment and replied with seemingly random capitalized words, did it make you feel better?

Who the fuck are you? Why are you talking to me? Go away.

 

[Hawkeye10]

In America today almost all of the violence and assaults on freedom come from the Regressive WOKE, who claim to be leftists.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

While I generally don't go after a source, I will this time. But I will also provide more than ad hominem to prove their gross bias and lies.

I'm willing to toss the source I used. It's not the only one that finds Right Wing Violence to be more than Left Wing.

The rest of your post was a waste of electrons.

Look, I get it, you LIKE your neo-nazis and murder thugs on the Right. You guys love your guns more than anything else and so OF COURSE you guys are more violent. You start off that way.

So go ahead, screeeeeeech all you like. Remember: YOUR GUY LIKES THE NEO-NAZIS. Trump TOLD YOU HE FOUND GOOD PEOPLE among that side. YOU GOT HIM. You live with it.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

In America today almost all of the violence and assaults on freedom come from the Regressive WOKE, who claim to be leftists.

You have any proof of that? no, no you do not.

 

[zymurgy]

Who the fuck are you? Why are you talking to me? Go away.

I'm here to stay Karen. suck it bitch!

 

[T. A. Gardner]

I'm willing to toss the source I used. It's not the only one that finds Right Wing Violence to be more than Left Wing.

The rest of your post was a waste of electrons.

Look, I get it, you LIKE your neo-nazis and murder thugs on the Right. You guys love your guns more than anything else and so OF COURSE you guys are more violent. You start off that way.

So go ahead, screeeeeeech all you like. Remember: YOUR GUY LIKES THE NEO-NAZIS. Trump TOLD YOU HE FOUND GOOD PEOPLE among that side. YOU GOT HIM. You live with it.

Look, I know you're an idiot, but I won't belabor the point. Your appeal to popularity is the waste of time here. Multiple articles all referencing the same source(s) doesn't make them correct by volume. It's a form of argumentum ad nauseam. That is they repeat the same wrong thing over and over expecting you to accept it because 'everyone says so.'

Then you get into the ludicrous zone. I don't like Neo-Nazis and murder thugs on the Right. I see them as nothing but a bunch of knuckleheads that mostly beat each other up. This part of your argument is really just an argument from fallacy. You have ZERO proof of any of that, and it's worse when you try specifically labeling me with it. Instead, this is just made-up shit on your part.

As I pointed out earlier, it wasn't just the source you picked but all the sources you cited that were wrong, along with citing more on top of that. You obviously don't do your homework, nor do you bother to even critically read the articles you cite. Otherwise, you'd have known that what you were posting was horribly inaccurate.

 

[Hawkeye10]

What is happening now is more like the Chinese Cultural Revolution then Germany.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

Isn't it fascinating that only trump's words cause violence but never a leftist. Things that make you go, "Hmmmmmm".

Exactly how many Hum jobs have you given lately HUMMER!

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I'm here to stay Karen. suck it bitch!

No one is sucking anything you have on offer anytime soon. I suspect it's been in more than one glory hole.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Look, I know you're an idiot,

At least I'm smarter than you!

Then you get into the ludicrous zone. I don't like Neo-Nazis and murder thugs on the Right.

Sure, sure.

I see them as nothing but a bunch of knuckleheads that mostly beat each other up.

I see the whiny morons you post about on the Left as mostly a bunch of knuckleheads that mostly just whine to no effect. But YOU paint them as the Left.

So I'm doing to you what you do to others.

And clearly you DO NOT LIKE IT.

It triggers you.

Because you are a HYPOCRITE.

(Go ahead and google all the big words you are unfamiliar with, moron.)

 

[PostmodernProphet]

A candidate for a Pennsylvania house seat has been attacked at his home following two incidents of vandalism.

https://www.post-gazette.com/news/e...-seat-assaulted-election/stories/202210310087

I wonder if the guy supports defunding the police.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

wasn't Ryan attacked by his neighbor?.......

 

[Walt]

Does having a wallet make you a capitalist?

According to Adam Smith it does. He only used the word capitalist to indicate someone who moves capital. Assuming there is money in the wallet, that would make someone moving capital in and out of a wallet a capitalist.

 

[Earl]

According to Adam Smith it does. He only used the word capitalist to indicate someone who moves capital. Assuming there is money in the wallet, that would make someone moving capital in and out of a wallet a capitalist.

Walter, why do you even try?

 

[AProudLefty]

The MAGAturda screech everytime they are called Fascists or Nazis.

Liberals laugh when they call us Marxists and Communists.

What a stark difference.

 

[AProudLefty]

Look, I know you're an idiot, but I won't belabor the point. Your appeal to popularity is the waste of time here. Multiple articles all referencing the same source(s) doesn't make them correct by volume. It's a form of argumentum ad nauseam. That is they repeat the same wrong thing over and over expecting you to accept it because 'everyone says so.'

Then you get into the ludicrous zone. I don't like Neo-Nazis and murder thugs on the Right. I see them as nothing but a bunch of knuckleheads that mostly beat each other up. This part of your argument is really just an argument from fallacy. You have ZERO proof of any of that, and it's worse when you try specifically labeling me with it. Instead, this is just made-up shit on your part.

As I pointed out earlier, it wasn't just the source you picked but all the sources you cited that were wrong, along with citing more on top of that. You obviously don't do your homework, nor do you bother to even critically read the articles you cite. Otherwise, you'd have known that what you were posting was horribly inaccurate.

Funny how you show your "dislike" of the Neo-Nazis.

 

[Earl]

Look, I know you're an idiot, but I won't belabor the point. Your appeal to popularity is the waste of time here. Multiple articles all referencing the same source(s) doesn't make them correct by volume. It's a form of argumentum ad nauseam. That is they repeat the same wrong thing over and over expecting you to accept it because 'everyone says so.'

Then you get into the ludicrous zone. I don't like Neo-Nazis and murder thugs on the Right. I see them as nothing but a bunch of knuckleheads that mostly beat each other up. This part of your argument is really just an argument from fallacy. You have ZERO proof of any of that, and it's worse when you try specifically labeling me with it. Instead, this is just made-up shit on your part.

As I pointed out earlier, it wasn't just the source you picked but all the sources you cited that were wrong, along with citing more on top of that. You obviously don't do your homework, nor do you bother to even critically read the articles you cite. Otherwise, you'd have known that what you were posting was horribly inaccurate.

Indeed.