MORE right-wing political violence. 1930s Germany, here we come.

"often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition" - Merriam-Webster.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

Sounds like Biden and the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses to me.

January 6 was a group of Nationalists who were trying to subvert the Constitutional process of establishing the democratically elected leader in order to instead anoint Donald Trump dictator and autocratic ruler. They were trying to forcibly opress the opposition using weapons, and the leaders acknowledge they were hoping Trump would activate the military to come in on their side.

That's a pile of lie filled leftist drivel. Protesting is a Constitutional right. Some of those people did break in and fight with police, and they were dealt with.

There was no coup. There was no insurrection. They were not armed. The only people killed that day were unarmed protestors.

Now contrast that with the Democrat supported BLM riots. Now THAT was a violent attempt to take over cities, police departments and private property.

Donald Trump the one they were trying to appoint supports strict social regimentation by opposing protest movements (unless they support him) and opposing the legitimacy of those who are not within the social norm (homosexuals and other minorities).

More lie filled bullshit. I don't think you can post without lying your dumb ass off and looking moronic.

The rioters often mention that they expected Trump to declare martial law then they could use the police and military to appoint Trump to lead the nation.

LINK? No one cares what a few loons say. But apparently Democrats think that rioting, burning and looting are mostly peaceful. :palm:
 
Well at least you tried this time I'll give you that.

They didn't try very hard to subvert the constitution did they? And trump didn't declare martial law even though he had the full power and authority to do so. What it comes down to is you have a trespassing situation and you're trying to turn it into fascism. Now i know to people like you things are true because you think they are true but to normal people we deal with things as they are and not how we think they are.

You do not believe those people had any intent do do anything but Trespass? Do you believe those people whacking the police over and over again with flagpoles were simple trespassers? What about the guy throwing fire extinguishers? Did the people chanting "Hang Mike Pence" have any intent other than to trespass? They guy who took documents and a laptop from Pelosi's office has any intent other than to trespass? What about those who shat on the floor, just trespass? Did those who had zip ties only intend to trespass? What about the broken windows, just trespass?

Finally what about the oath keepers on trial for seditious conspiracy, the ones who planned how to kill Nancy Pelosi and where to stash weaponry for when Trump declared Martial Law? Were they just trespassing?

IDIOT!


No question in my mind, (or yours if you would be honest), that Trump would have declared martial law if he thought there was a chance he could have gotten a few key generals on his side.
 
How many times we going see the Scalise, Paul, Kavanaugh whataboutism

As long as we see Trump whataboutisms. Hypocritical moron. :palm:

First off, if we were to ping pong on numbers alone the right attacks on left leaning figures would be immensely higher

Bullshit arsecheese. Go ahead, you start, and I'll finish. Dunce. :palm:

Secondly, to deal with the ones you provided, Scalise’s shooter can not be traced back directly to any rhetoric Democrat politician offered,

You lying dumb hack. The guy was a vocal Bernie Sanders supporter asswhipe. :palm:

Bernie Sanders ADMITS Scalise Shooter Worked For His Campaign
https://redstate.com/joesquire/2017...admits-scalise-shooter-worked-campaign-n73223

...can’t say the same for Pelosi’s.

The whack job homeless illegal alien Canadian had no connection With Republicans you brain dead dumbass. :palm:

Paul, as much as the MAGA militia attempt to reframe it, was attacked by his neighbor over a yard dispute, again wasn’t inspired by rhetoric coming from the left.

Yet, leftist hacks on MSNBC and in the DNC were happy about the attack dipshit.

And just how serious was Kavanaugh’s case, the guy was picked up blocks from his house and even called the police ahead of time telling them he was coming.

He admitted he was there to cause bodily harm to a Supreme Court Justice. Gosh, I wonder what rhetoric inspired him? Schumer perhaps?
“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

You're a moron and a hypocritical douchebag.

You can try again, but based on this effort, why bother

You can lie again, but based on this effort, you will still look like the dumbest, uninformed, leftist moron hack on the planet. :palm:
 
You do not believe those people had any intent do do anything but Trespass? Do you believe those people whacking the police over and over again with flagpoles were simple trespassers? What about the guy throwing fire extinguishers? Did the people chanting "Hang Mike Pence" have any intent other than to trespass? They guy who took documents and a laptop from Pelosi's office has any intent other than to trespass? What about those who shat on the floor, just trespass? Did those who had zip ties only intend to trespass? What about the broken windows, just trespass?

Finally what about the oath keepers on trial for seditious conspiracy, the ones who planned how to kill Nancy Pelosi and where to stash weaponry for when Trump declared Martial Law? Were they just trespassing?

IDIOT!


No question in my mind, (or yours if you would be honest), that Trump would have declared martial law if he thought there was a chance he could have gotten a few key generals on his side.

One can think Yakuda is stupid--I do. But I think he is genuinely ignorant and intellectually lazy.
 
Did he say they were “evil?” “Traitors?” or bring up a “Second Amendment solutions?”

Seriously? Are you really this dishonest and moronic?

"Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic," Biden said. "MAGA Republicans do not respect the Constitution. They do not believe in the rule of the law. They do not recognize the will of the people. They refuse to accept the results of a free election."

I'm sorry, but when a President labels 77 million Americans as extremists and a threat to the nation, I would say that is not only asinine, but extremely dangerous. The only reason anyone uses that kind of language is to demean and dehumanize them to the point of insinuating they are deserving of attack and perhaps even killing.

You shrill low IQ, lying hypocrites on the left need to get your heads out of your assholes. Your tiny brains need some oxygen. :palm:
 
They aren’t going to accept that, in their world it was a normal tourist day, FBI led, Pelosi’s fault, or the Capital Police let them in, just to bring up a few “explanations”

I don't think you can post without lying, using a strawman or looking like a hypocritical dumb moron. :palm:
 
I'm so sorry to hear you can't read. My sincerest apologies. Maybe your mom and dad can help you.

All you need do is read some history. That'll answer your question. But since you can't read you'll have a problem.

If someone did it would be without context for dumbasses like you who don't understand any of the topic. So you will need more education before you get to ask more questions.

Or just wait until high school when you might have a real history class? Might have to wait until college, but given that you aren't smart enough to make it into even a fake university that's unlikely I suppose.

Nothing says dumbass more than a smarmy, smug idiot who thinks they are smart, when they are not. :palm:
 
Telling a fascist organization to "stand by" in response to a question about if you will accept a potential election loss, is FASCIST.

That isn't what Trump did, lying dumbass. Obviously, you get your information from MSNBC. Had you watched the debate, it was obvious the question itself was dishonest and loaded and when Trump didn't know what the moderator was saying, Biden jumped in and stated "Proud Boys."

Chris Wallace: (41:33)
You have repeatedly criticized the vice president for not specifically calling out Antifa and other left wing extremist groups. But are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia group and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland.

President Donald J. Trump: (41:57)
Sure, I’m will to do that.

Chris Wallace: (41:59)
Are you prepared specifically to do it.

President Donald J. Trump: (42:00)
I would say almost everything I see is from the left wing not from the right wing.

Chris Wallace: (42:04)
But what are you saying?

President Donald J. Trump: (42:06)
I’m willing to do anything. I want to see peace.

Chris Wallace: (42:08)
Well, do it, sir.

Vice President Joe Biden: (42:09)
Say it, do it say it.

President Donald J. Trump: (42:10)
What do you want to call them? Give me a name, give me a name, go ahead who do you want me to condemn.

Chris Wallace: (42:14)
White supremacist and right-wing militia.

Vice President Joe Biden: (42:14)
Proud Boys.

President Donald J. Trump: (42:18)
Proud Boys, stand back and stand by. But I’ll tell you what somebody’s got to do something about Antifa and the left because this is not a right wing problem this is a left wing…


It was a STRAWMAN question from the dipshit Wallace in that NO ONE has ever said they support white supremacists. Trump's argument was that he sees more from the left and not the right, which is FACTUAL.

https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-joe-biden-1st-presidential-debate-transcript-2020
 
I posted this in response to you in another thread but because I've got time I'll go over it point by point. Editing the message as I go so bear with me.

1. Cult of Tradition could easily be paralleled by today's hard line evangelical right. It could also be exemplified in MAGA, trying to proclaim some fictional past as being universally better than today, or even the cult-like devotion to Trump himself and the shitty behavior he promotes (misogyny, hurting or cheating people that "deserve it')

2. This one's easy, and spread all throughout conservatism. The obvious hatred towards non-traditional sexual orientations, hatred of increased representation in media, to the promotion of a "traditional" family unit with stay-at-home wives et al.

3. Action for action's sake is pretty broad, and could be more of just a human flaw, but Trump and MAGA both will go out of their way to make decisions based on gut feelings and not based on reality or reason. It's part of the basis for conspiracy theories that there CAN'T be a simple explanation for something so action must be taken in opposition to reason for action's sake.

4. Another human flaw perhaps but all too often someone in MAGA claim someone is a "traitor" and hints to how traitors should be punished. MTG even had to explain her reason for saying that about Nancy Pelosi under oath.

5. Yes, another human flaw but all too easily taken advantage of by the current alt-right movement. Replacement theory, hatred of immigrants and asylum seekers, hatred of LBGTQ+, and now the Jews again (classics never die I guess).

6. Hitler blamed Jews, Trump and MAGA will blame anyone or anything that's convenient. Most of the time it's thinly veiled racism but there's also general hatred for anyone that leans slightly left. They claim America isn't "great" because they're not in complete control, "they" being mostly white males in the MAGA movement.

7. Do I really have to explain this one? LMAO

8. This has been a running theme for each political opponent since at least Obama. In one breath Obama, Hillary, or Biden can go from being so frail or stupid they're unfit to be in office or such an evil mastermind that they have to be stopped at all costs. "Libs are soy boy beta cucks! Better get an AR-15 so I can defend myself from them!"

9. Admittedly pretty broad, examples of this on the right and left.

10. A big staple of the right currently. Hatred for anyone deemed as weak, coming from people who are clearly just terribly insecure about themselves. A big aspect of toxic masculinity, you don't have value unless you're "strong".

11. A specific example of this is the wolf/sheep mentality being spread through our police departments and to any dumbass with enough money to buy a gun.

12. Pretty self explanatory.

13. Dumbasses thinking MAGA is "half the population" for instance. It's not even close. MAGA is fringe.

14. Trump's vocabulary aside, trying to simplify any issue into a slogan is very prevalent on the right. Calling anyone "groomer", "China virus" "Fauci ouchie", etc.

Dumb fuck thinks this makes his lie look credible. :palm:
 
Biden painted half the county as semi fascist. Liberals need to stop using speech to incite violence as well, otherwise they are just hypocrites

Oh man. You twumpards are sooooo sensitive. Did Biden tell us to "fight like hell or we won't have a country anymore"? Dose Biden Tween hate every 10 seconds? No.

Your whataboutism fails hard.
 
Back
Top