What would a captive of Russia know about anything
cuckoo. cuckoo.
What would a captive of Russia know about anything
the retard base on the left is why I am excited about the next election
they can't even put forward coherent debates anymore.
As we gain more House Seats, more Senate seats, and more Governorships - watch them continue to frame the debate in the most retarded ways - such as the above.
cuckoo. cuckoo.
When you don't want to have them in you, embryos and fetuses are more like malignant tumors than babies.
I simply cannot understand why that wouldn't be obvious to any sane person not driven to dementia by religious superstitions.
People who allegedly hate big government love it when it interferes like this.
There's no remnant of sanity in such people, and they themselves should be euthanized.
When you don't want to have them in you, embryos and fetuses are more like malignant tumors than babies.
I simply cannot understand why that wouldn't be obvious to any sane person not driven to dementia by religious superstitions.
People who allegedly hate big government love it when it interferes like this.
There's no remnant of sanity in such people, and they themselves should be euthanized.
The FBI has repeatedly warned Americans of your internets presence
Do you hate the FBI TOO?
choice is just a buzzword
Alabama should be able to choose differently than California.
we can all frame this as being about choice
Do you think Alabama should still be allowed to own slaves too?
I hope it's ok to do start a thread based on a conversation that started in another thread, but I think it makes sense, seeing as how the original thread really had nothing to do with the subject. So, with that said, on to the conversation...
I agree that the issue is complicated, but I think the universal rule was a good one, if focusing on the wrong issues. I think the following article from the Washington Post on former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg brings up a lot of good points:
What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. Wade | Washington Post
It may appear to be behind a pay wall, but I've found that if I go in incognito mode, it lets me see the article after removing some pop up ads.
Quoting some interesting excerpts from said article:
**
There’s no question Ginsburg disagreed with how Roe was decided. But it’s hardly that simple.
Indeed Ginsburg’s criticisms of Roe generally had to do with pragmatic and political concerns, rather than saying it was outright wrong. And far from wanting to leave this decision to the states, as Friday’s decision does, she repeatedly sided with the idea that abortion was a constitutional right. She had preferred that right to be phased in more gradually and that it rely more on a different part of the Constitution — the right to equal protection rather than the right to privacy, the basis of Roe.
[snip]
Indeed, Ginsburg regularly said that Roe might have harmed the evolution of abortion rights by going too far, too fast. She argued support for abortion rights was already increasing, but that the court with its one fell swoop altered that trajectory and created a more polarized environment.
**
Republicans would again free them from you sociopaths
you are honestly the most immature old person I know online
plenty of honest, sincere, and intelligent discussion is going on in this thread, but you sink down to the Evince level and just troll about with her/it
cuckoo. cuckoo.
what a jackass thing to sayThe Republicans (The real Republicans) could never have even freed the slaves had they not had Democrats to go along with the idea and help pass the Amendment to the Constitution to do so!
SO you are wrong about the past and the future.
You TRUMPLICANS would like to repeal that amendment and return Blacks back to slavery now!
So you think the FBI Isis nuts?
Republicans would again free them from you sociopaths
I think you are nuts. I think all you do here is throw shit like a monkey at the zoo.
I'm bored with you as well.
After some thought, I've decided that I disagree with her that it would have been better let it continue to percolate in the states. My reasoning is I believe that having the law nation wide gave the U.S. the chance to see that life could still be alright while allowing abortions. Now, states that have gone back to banning abortions can remember how things used to be like, instead of never having had the experience of abortions being legal. However, I do agree that the decision should have focused more on a woman's rights, rather than a physicians'. Not that those aren't important too.
what a jackass thing to say
the democrats have the history of locking up Japanese, supporting slavery, and locking up those opposed to the wars.
Now they will force you to not be able to open your business or go to schools
you retards have always been the fascists. always have and always will

FUCK OFF- I do not argue with liars and Hateful idiots! OK?
