Another DeSantis Fail

They believed that they were eligible. They were told that, possibly by their parole officers. How is it fraud, a crime, when there was no intent?

You realize don't you dip shit that you can be charged with murder even if you didn't intend to kill someone. Regardless of what comey said about the talking pig in a pant suit you don't have to intend to commit a crime to be charged with one. You people are so retarded.
 
You realize don't you dip shit that you can be charged with murder even if you didn't intend to kill someone. Regardless of what comey said about the talking pig in a pant suit you don't have to intend to commit a crime to be charged with one. You people are so retarded.

Murder is not an intent crime. It is an act crime. You can be convicted of murder even if you don't willfully intend to kill someone. Voter fraud in Florida is an intent crime.

From the Florida statutes -
 A person who willfully submits any false voter registration information commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(1)(a) The unlawful killing of a human being:
1. When perpetrated from a premeditated design to effect the death of the person killed or any human being;
2. When committed by a person engaged in the perpetration of, or in the attempt to perpetrate, any:
a. Trafficking offense prohibited by s. 893.135(1),

Statutes that don't include intent to be charged can be charged no matter what the intent of the person was. Statutes that include intent require that the intent be shown before the person can be convicted.
 
Murder is not an intent crime. It is an act crime. You can be convicted of murder even if you don't willfully intend to kill someone. Voter fraud in Florida is an intent crime.

From the Florida statutes -



Statutes that don't include intent to be charged can be charged no matter what the intent of the person was. Statutes that include intent require that the intent be shown before the person can be convicted.

All crimes are act crimes except for leftists who are hell bent on making opposing opinions criminal.
 
You kind of missed one little word! applying to vote and voting while ineligible,

You missed one little word which is clearly written into the statute in Florida:

A person who willfully submits any false voter registration information commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
https://flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2021/Chapter104

Simply making a mistake is not a crime. The law clearly requires intent since that is the meaning of "willfully."
 
All crimes are act crimes except for leftists who are hell bent on making opposing opinions criminal.

OMG. You are so stupid. You do realize that means that you are committing a crime right now under your interpretation of the law since you are arguing that intent is not written into the laws.

You are providing legal advice on the interpretation and meaning of laws. Giving legal advice without being a lawyer is a crime. (The law actually requires intent.)

454.23 Penalties.—Any person not licensed or otherwise authorized to practice law in this state who practices law in this state or holds himself or herself out to the public as qualified to practice law in this state, or who willfully pretends to be, or willfully takes or uses any name, title, addition, or description implying that he or she is qualified, or recognized by law as qualified, to practice law in this state, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

You are certainly implying you are qualified to interpret laws.
 
OMG. You are so stupid. You do realize that means that you are committing a crime right now under your interpretation of the law since you are arguing that intent is not written into the laws.

You are providing legal advice on the interpretation and meaning of laws. Giving legal advice without being a lawyer is a crime. (The law actually requires intent.)



You are certainly implying you are qualified to interpret laws.

Cite a crime that isnt an "act" crime as you call it.
 
You missed one little word which is clearly written into the statute in Florida:


https://flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2021/Chapter104

Simply making a mistake is not a crime.

The law clearly requires intent since that is the meaning of "willfully."

Simply making a mistake is not a crime. Try that defense when you accidently exceed the speed limit. My supervisor of elections mails a sample ballot to every registered voter prior to every election. If you loose your right to vote you are notified. Sorry a violation of the law is a violation accidently or not.
 
Simply making a mistake is not a crime. Try that defense when you accidently exceed the speed limit. My supervisor of elections mails a sample ballot to every registered voter prior to every election. If you loose your right to vote you are notified. Sorry a violation of the law is a violation accidently or not.

All of these cases were shit bags like this


We told you so


But you believed the fox lies yet again


Losers just keep losing and pretending they won


Idiots
 
You realize don't you dip shit that you can be charged with murder even if you didn't intend to kill someone. Regardless of what comey said about the talking pig in a pant suit you don't have to intend to commit a crime to be charged with one. You people are so retarded.

Except trump?


According to you trump should be convicted then
 
Simply making a mistake is not a crime. Try that defense when you accidently exceed the speed limit. My supervisor of elections mails a sample ballot to every registered voter prior to every election. If you loose your right to vote you are notified. Sorry a violation of the law is a violation accidently or not.

Certain crimes, those which carry a punishment of jail, prison or probation, require proof of intent to criminally charge, prosecute and convict.

Simple traffic infractions like exceeding the speed limit are not treated the same as major crimes.

Even vehicular homicide requires some intent to do something illegal that led to someone else's death.

DUI, reckless driving, etc.

A simple accident, even one that kills someone is not a prosecutable criminal offense.
 
Simply making a mistake is not a crime. Try that defense when you accidently exceed the speed limit. My supervisor of elections mails a sample ballot to every registered voter prior to every election. If you loose your right to vote you are notified. Sorry a violation of the law is a violation accidently or not.

The law against speeding is not an intent crime. It is an act crime. The law against speeding doesn't require the act to be "willful" before it is a crime, it only requires that the act occur.
Try arguing to a judge that someone is guilty of a "willful" crime if they did the act without intent. You will get laughed out of court.,
 
Sorry lady, ignorance to the law is not an excuse. It is real easy to check your voting status with a phone call. Funny in all these years I have never voted illegally maybe it's a conservative thing. LOL
Sorry, it is in this case, intent…
 
The law against speeding is not an intent crime. It is an act crime. The law against speeding doesn't require the act to be "willful" before it is a crime, it only requires that the act occur.
Try arguing to a judge that someone is guilty of a "willful" crime if they did the act without intent. You will get laughed out of court.,

Are you trying to tell me when you step on the gas you don't intend to break the law? :rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
You have been watching too many Perry Mason episodes.
 
Are you trying to tell me when you step on the gas you don't intend to break the law? :rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
You have been watching too many Perry Mason episodes.

I am saying the law doesn't have to prove intent to convict someone of speeding. The mere act of speeding is all they have to prove.

When the law requires intent then they have to prove not only the act but the intent of the person doing the act. As was just posted on here about Bannon's appeal, in order to convict Bannon they had to prove intent to violate the law when he refused to respond to the subpoena. They did that and the jury convicted him based on intent. Bannon is trying to argue on appeal that the intent to not honor the subpoena and the act of not honoring the subpoena is not enough to convict him. He is arguing that they also have to prove he knew what he was doing was illegal. Shouldn't you be going to that thread and saying Bannon has watched too many episodes of Matlock? (You are really dating yourself by using Perry Mason references.)
 
Phan
You do understand that intent is impossible to prove.
Here is an example where there wasn't intent but the people were tried anyway.

https://www.themarshallproject.org/...ith-murder-even-if-they-haven-t-killed-anyone

Intent is not impossible to prove. One needs only prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
It has already been explained to you that murder does not require proving intent to convict. Some laws require intent exist for the crime to occur. Other laws don't require intent. Murder laws are ones where no intent is required which is why the laws don't use the word "willingly" in describing the crime.
 
Sorry lady, ignorance to the law is not an excuse. It is real easy to check your voting status with a phone call. Funny in all these years I have never voted illegally maybe it's a conservative thing. LOL

Apparently the conservative thing is to cheat. Whoops. lol

If you are told by a person in authority that you can register to vote, are you really going to try to figure out who in state govt. you should call to verify that? Wouldn't you accept it at face value, assume that they know what they're talking about, and that when you go to register if you're not eligible someone will tell you that? Don't you find it interesting that DeSantis's little Voting Gestapo could only find "fraud" by going through the roles of paroled felons and checking to see if any of them had registered and/or voted? And that of all the parolees in FL, they could only find 20 to arrest?

I don't understand why you believe that these ppl intentionally registered and voted fraudulently. If they wanted to go back to prison so bad, aren't there easier ways of doing that?
 
I am saying the law doesn't have to prove intent to convict someone of speeding. The mere act of speeding is all they have to prove.

When the law requires intent then they have to prove not only the act but the intent of the person doing the act. As was just posted on here about Bannon's appeal, in order to convict Bannon they had to prove intent to violate the law when he refused to respond to the subpoena. They did that and the jury convicted him based on intent. Bannon is trying to argue on appeal that the intent to not honor the subpoena and the act of not honoring the subpoena is not enough to convict him. He is arguing that they also have to prove he knew what he was doing was illegal. Shouldn't you be going to that thread and saying Bannon has watched too many episodes of Matlock? (You are really dating yourself by using Perry Mason references.)

You confuse general intent and specific intent. General intent only needs to prove the persln did the crime. Specific intent the state has to prove you meant to commit the crime and you did the crime.
Most crimes fall under general intent. Sorry Perry wrong again.
 
Back
Top