cawacko
Well-known member
Worth stating I argued that there is racism causing disparity, not that any disparity is caused by racism. There is a subtle difference.
Black immigrants from Africa do better than American whites. Immigrants generally do better than Americans.
Shouldn't the goal be educating people? Grades might be a good tool to use to get to that goal, but when did they become the goal in themselves? If grades and tests are the goal, we can just give everyone straight A's and call it a day. No need to "waste" our time with education, if it is not a goal.
Don't quote me on this but I believe a very sizable number of black students in the Ivy Leagues are first or second generation immigrants. The argument I've heard is they didn't have to grow up with the legacy of slavery thus their better performance. That's a whole other discussion.
Schools, and especially elite schools, need some form of measurement to identify top students. If our current system of doing so is racist then what should be implemented in its place?
We also exist in a global world today. A lot of Boomers on this board didn't have to compete with large number of Asian, Indian and students from all over the world when applying for schools. Our education system needs to set up our kids to compete, and succeed, in a global economy. How to do that with the push for equity is the question.