Martha's Vineyard merchant says there's a ‘process’ for coming to America, 'follow th

The Immigration and Nationality Act specifically allows immigrants to apply for asylum even if they do not appear at a port of entryi. Trump tried to change that policy but was unsuccessful.

[FONT="]"One method of legal immigration into the United States is for migrants to present themselves to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials at [/FONT][URL="https://www.cbp.gov/contact/ports/tx"]ports of entry[/URL][FONT="] and request asylum. Undocumented migrants who are apprehended while trying to cross the border illegally between ports of entry also can request asylum; the Trump administration [/FONT][URL="https://www.texastribune.org/2018/11/08/trump-administration-announces-new-rules-immigrants-seeking-asylum/"]tried unsuccessfully[/URL][FONT="] to change this policy in November."

[/FONT][URL="https://www.uscis.gov/laws-and-policy/legislation/immigration-and-nationality-act"]Immigration and Nationality Act | USCIS[/URL]

Mr. Homan does not know the law or he made that statement before trump's policy was overturned. The president has no authority to change a federal law.

what country is Venezuela at war with?
 
Last edited:
The Immigration and Nationality Act specifically allows immigrants to apply for asylum even if they do not appear at a port of entryi. Trump tried to change that policy but was unsuccessful.

[FONT=&quot]"One method of legal immigration into the United States is for migrants to present themselves to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials at [/FONT]ports of entry[FONT=&quot] and request asylum. Undocumented migrants who are apprehended while trying to cross the border illegally between ports of entry also can request asylum; the Trump administration [/FONT]tried unsuccessfully[FONT=&quot] to change this policy in November."

[/FONT]Immigration and Nationality Act | USCIS

Mr. Homan does not know the law or he made that statement before trump's policy was overturned. The president has no authority to change a federal law.
what country is Venezuela at war with?

they have no reason to be seeking asylum in the US
 
Last edited:
what country is Venezuela at war with?

[FONT=source_sans_pro_regular]To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.

[/FONT]
Obtaining Asylum in the United States | USCIS

They don't have to be at war with anybody:

"[FONT=source_sans_pro_regular]Every year people come to the United States seeking protection because they have suffered persecution or fear that they will suffer persecution due to:[/FONT]
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Nationality
  • Membership in a particular social group
  • Political opinion
[FONT=source_sans_pro_regular]You may only file this application if you are physically present in the United States, and you are not a U.S. citizen."

Asylum | USCIS[/FONT]
 
[FONT=source_sans_pro_regular]To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.

[/FONT]
Obtaining Asylum in the United States | USCIS

They don't have to be at war with anybody:

"[FONT=source_sans_pro_regular]Every year people come to the United States seeking protection because they have suffered persecution or fear that they will suffer persecution due to:[/FONT]
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Nationality
  • Membership in a particular social group
  • Political opinion
[FONT=source_sans_pro_regular]You may only file this application if you are physically present in the United States, and you are not a U.S. citizen."

Asylum | USCIS[/FONT]
From your link



Burden of proof
(i) In general
The burden of proof is on the applicant
to establish that the applicant is a refugee,
within the meaning of section

1101(a)(42)(A) of this title. To establish
that the applicant is a refugee within the
meaning of such section, the applicant
must establish that race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social
group, or political opinion was or will be
at least one central reason for persecuting
the applicant.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg...020-title8-chap12-subchapII-partI-sec1158.pdf




8 USC 1101(a)
INA 101(a)

, within the country in which such person is habitually residing, and who is
persecuted or who has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion

https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets...mmigration and Nationality Act 101(a)(42).pdf



so how does a Venezuelan fall under that? just because their county is a commie shit hole?

So why does Biden tell Cubans NO get lost
 
Last edited:
martha's vineyard is known to be one of the most racist spots on earth.

:truestory:

011_jpg-2530544-jpg.1087193
 
Learn to read. I didn't say a "legal border crossing." I said to border officials. The "metering" policy limits how many immigrants can cross the border to request asylum each day. That leaves the remaining thousands to stay at the Mexican border subject to crime and injury, so many choose to walk across the border and turn themselves into border officials. These people can also request asylum. With an 80,000 backload of cases they cannot all be detained in border facilities.

Try checking immigration and border patrol information rather than right-wing talk shows for your information. I don't think I am smart. I just think I can read creditable sources rather than looking for stuff to whine about.

As soon as they cross the border without documentation, they are illegal criminals.
 
What Is Illegal Entry to the United States?

U.S. immigration law actually uses the term "improper entry," which has a broad meaning. It's more than just slipping across the U.S. border at an unguarded point. Improper entry can include:

entering or attempting to enter the United States at any time or place other than one designated by U.S. immigration officers (in other words, away from a border inspection point or other port of entry)
eluding examination or inspection by U.S. immigration officers (people have tried everything from digging tunnels to hiding in the trunk of a friend's car)
attempting to enter or obtain entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or willful concealment of a material fact (which might include, for example, lying on a visa application or buying a false green card or other entry document).
(See Title 8, Section 1325 of the U.S. Code (U.S.C.), or Section 275 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (I.N.A.) for the exact statutory language.

Criminal Penalties for Improper Entry to the United States

For the first improper entry offense, the person can be fined (as a criminal penalty), or imprisoned for up to six months, or both.

For a subsequent offense, the person can be fined or imprisoned for up to two years, or both. (See 8 U.S.C. Section 1325, I.N.A. Section 275.)

But just in case that isn't enough to deter illegal entrants, a separate section of the law adds penalties for reentry (or attempted reentry) in cases where the person had been convicted of certain types of crimes and thus removed (deported) from the U.S., as follows:

People removed for a conviction of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a felony (other than an aggravated felony), shall be fined, imprisoned for up to ten years, or both.
People removed for a conviction of an aggravated felony shall be fined, imprisoned for up to 20 years, or both.
People who were excluded or removed from the United States for security reasons shall be fined, and imprisoned for up to ten years, which sentence shall not run concurrently with any other sentence.
Nonviolent offenders who were removed from the United States before their prison sentence was up shall be fined, imprisoned for up to ten years, or both.
What's more, someone deported before completing their prison sentence may be incarcerated for the remainder of the sentence, without any reduction for parole or supervised release.L
allaw.com
 
Published September 17, 2022 7:41pm EDT

Martha's Vineyard merchant says there's a ‘process’ for coming to America, 'follow that'

Rhode Island resident Paul Sinclair who does business in Martha's Vineyard said the island could have done more in response to the migrants' arrival from Florida
By Kerry J. Byrne | Fox News


Martha's Vineyard guests and residents share reaction to migrants on their island with Fox News Digital

Fox News Digital spoke to people on Martha's Vineyard on Saturday, Sept. 17, 2022, to get their thoughts about the presence of illegal migrants sent to their island this week.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

OAK BLUFFS, Mass. – At least one person on this oasis of leftist elites blames federal officials for the illegal immigration crisis that thrust Martha’s Vineyard into the national spotlight.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis sent 50 migrants by plane Wednesday to the Massachusetts island, which boasts one of the wealthiest and most hard-left voting blocs in the nation.

"I think it was a political stunt," Paul Sinclair of Rhode Island told Fox News Digital on Saturday, as he sold T-shirts and surf gear during a street festival on Circuit Avenue in Oak Bluffs, one of the commercial hubs of Martha’s Vineyard.

MARTHA'S VINEYARD ‘RALLIES RELIEF EFFORT’ FOR MIGRANTS BY SHIPPING THEM TO CAPE COD MILITARY BASE

"But like any problem if you want to fix a problem make it visible. And I think (the problem) was made visible."

The phrase "political stunt" has been used on the island and elsewhere in leftist political circles to criticize DeSantis.
Paul Sinclair, a Martha's Vineyard vendor from Rhode Island, told Fox News Digital he hopes the arrival of 50 migrants on the resort island on Wednesday, Sept. 14, brings attention to the need to follow the legal immigration process."
https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/m...ays-theres-process-coming-america-follow-that

MY, MY, MY, how views change when forced to walk in someone else's shoes. :laugh:
 
The "process" for the far left Democrat Socoialists obviously does not involve sending illegals to Martha's Vinyard, N.Y.C. or D.C.

Obviously.
 
Illegal Entry”/8 U.S.C. § 1325 makes it a crime to unlawfully enter the United States. It applies to people who do not enter with proper inspection at a port of entry, such as those who enter between ports of entry, avoid examination or inspection, or who make false statements while entering or attempting to enter. A first offense is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, up to six months in prison, or both.
“Illegal Re-Entry”/8 U.S.C. § 1326 makes it a crime to unlawfully reenter, attempt to unlawfully reenter, or to be found in the United States after having been deported, ordered removed, or denied admission. This crime is punishable as a felony with a maximum sentence of two years in prison. Higher penalties apply if the person was previously removed after having been convicted of certain crimes: up to 10 years for a single felony conviction (other than an aggravated felony conviction) or three misdemeanor convictions involving drugs or crimes against a person, and up to 20 years for an aggravated felony conviction..
 
From your link



Burden of proof
(i) In general
The burden of proof is on the applicant
to establish that the applicant is a refugee,
within the meaning of section

1101(a)(42)(A) of this title. To establish
that the applicant is a refugee within the
meaning of such section, the applicant
must establish that race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social
group, or political opinion was or will be
at least one central reason for persecuting
the applicant.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg...020-title8-chap12-subchapII-partI-sec1158.pdf




8 USC 1101(a)
INA 101(a)

, within the country in which such person is habitually residing, and who is
persecuted or who has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion

https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets...mmigration and Nationality Act 101(a)(42).pdf

so how does a Venezuelan fall under that? just because their county is a commie shit hole?

So why does Biden tell Cubans NO get lost

I guess the same way those from any other country fall under those provisions. If they cannot prove they meet these conditions they are not granted refugee status which is only granted to about 50% of applicants. My guess for Venezuela is that an opponent of Maduro is probably not safe.

But, there cannot be many granted refugee or asylum status from Venezuela since only 298 applicants from South American were approved in 2019.

Table 14. Refugee Arrivals by Region and Country of Nationality: Fiscal Years 2017 to 2019 | Homeland Security (dhs.gov)
 
They are not breaking the law when they present themselves at a checkpoint and ask for asylum.

They are crossing illegally (watch them on FOX TV) then asking for asylum.

The American checkpoints are on the US side. They cross illegally to get to the check points. (All check points are not legal asylum locations).

That is not the procedure.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top