Another sign the Gorebal Warming tards are just that

They got the broad strokes right. I mean, the main thing is that the way we live right now IS NOT SUSTAINABLE for the long term.

No, they didn't. With CFC's they claimed the hole in the ozone layer at the South Pole would "heal and close" if these were eliminated. It's still there and still the same size. Worse, they've found a newer, bigger hole in it.

Scientists found a massive new hole in the ozone layer that could affect 50% of the population
https://bgr.com/science/scientists-...layer-that-could-affect-50-of-the-population/

Then there's methane, water vapor, aircraft contrails, etc., they're finding contribute more than CO2 does to warming. Then they discover massive rainforests aren't "the lungs of the planet" like they thought. What these knuckleheads don't know would fill the Pacific Ocean, while what they do know wouldn't fill a teacup.

That is pretty well proven at this point, and not really disputable. There is too much "they were wrong about the ice age, so let's ignore all of the warning signs now!" kind of talk. The planet is letting us know we can't continue this way, pretty clearly.

No, it's not proven, not even close.
 
No, they didn't. With CFC's they claimed the hole in the ozone layer at the South Pole would "heal and close" if these were eliminated. It's still there and still the same size. Worse, they've found a newer, bigger hole in it.


https://bgr.com/science/scientists-...layer-that-could-affect-50-of-the-population/

Then there's methane, water vapor, aircraft contrails, etc., they're finding contribute more than CO2 does to warming. Then they discover massive rainforests aren't "the lungs of the planet" like they thought. What these knuckleheads don't know would fill the Pacific Ocean, while what they do know wouldn't fill a teacup.



No, it's not proven, not even close.

LOL

You don't think the CFC ban worked?

What do you do....read a blurb here & there, and think you know a topic inside & out?
 
The year 2053 projects temperatures to remain in triple digits. I just hate the GOP senators who have for decades ignore the cry for climate policies will be dead and burning in hell. I just hope their off spring is around to roast.

:lolup:
 
I always crack up when people say dire predictions from decades ago were wrong.

Our environment today is RADICALLY different from even 30 years ago. We're in the middle of a mass extinction, weather patterns are much more erratic. habitat is disappearing at an unsustainable rate, our food & water supplies are in much worse shape. There are warning signs all around us.

How are people missing them? It's hard to comprehend.

The planet has been warming since the end of the Little Ice Age. Look it up, it's natural.
 
What future? ... there is no future according to your Death Cult. :dunno:

Why don't leftists know about the Little Ice Age?

So, you believe climate changes throughout planetary history have one uniform cause, and that's just how it always is?

Is it the same with everything? Putin invaded the Ukraine...so that must be how all wars start?
 
No, they didn't. With CFC's they claimed the hole in the ozone layer at the South Pole would "heal and close" if these were eliminated. It's still there and still the same size. Worse, they've found a newer, bigger hole in it.


https://bgr.com/science/scientists-...layer-that-could-affect-50-of-the-population/

Then there's methane, water vapor, aircraft contrails, etc., they're finding contribute more than CO2 does to warming. Then they discover massive rainforests aren't "the lungs of the planet" like they thought. What these knuckleheads don't know would fill the Pacific Ocean, while what they do know wouldn't fill a teacup.



No, it's not proven, not even close.

Ozone layer: Banned CFCs traced to China say scientists

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48353341
 
So, you believe climate changes throughout planetary history have one uniform cause, and that's just how it always is?

Is it the same with everything? Putin invaded the Ukraine...so that must be how all wars start?

No. And you should be glad the Little Ice Age ended.
 
Ozone layer: Banned CFCs traced to China say scientists

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48353341


th



maggot is a trier .


Haw, haw............................haw.
 
Global warming is a fact, as is climate change and anthropogenic causation.

The way forward is not to argue with Denier Dumbasses , the way forward is to incarcerate them in re-education facilities.



Haw, haw.............................haw.
 
Yes, a flooring guy knows more about climate than the scientists do. Thank God we have our resident Nazi/rocket scientist to walk us through all of this.
 
This year has brought droughts to much of Europe. In Germany, the Elbe River has fallen to a low that has uncovered stones that were inscribed with warnings about droughts some 500 years ago. I'm sure that Gorebal Warming was the cause back then too... :rolleyes:


https://www.yahoo.com/news/historic-climate-fueled-drought-europe-183753449.html

Global warming is not just a problem here, just like the Colorado River here in the USA, just look at what is happening in China with the Yangtze River.


China is seeding clouds to replenish its shrinking Yangtze River

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/17/asia/china-heat-drought-climate-yangtze-intl/index.html
 
The year 2053 projects temperatures to remain in triple digits. I just hate the GOP senators who have for decades ignore the cry for climate policies will be dead and burning in hell. I just hope their off spring is around to roast.

you seem like a reasonable fellow.
:rolleyes:
 
This year has brought droughts to much of Europe. In Germany, the Elbe River has fallen to a low that has uncovered stones that were inscribed with warnings about droughts some 500 years ago. I'm sure that Gorebal Warming was the cause back then too... :rolleyes:


https://www.yahoo.com/news/historic-climate-fueled-drought-europe-183753449.html

Aren't you cute using a logical fallacy to try to support your position.

Let's give some other examples of that logical fallacy.
There was ice back in 1616. That proves that freezers can't work since freezers were not the cause of ice back then.
There were rivers that were blocked with debris causing the river to back up and create a lake. That proves that man can't dam a river with a concrete dam to create a lake since that was not the cause of dams causing lakes back then.
 
If they couldn't predict future climate with a reasonable degree of accuracy then, why should I believe they'll predict future climate with a reasonable degree of accuracy now?

If they couldn't go to the moon in 1616 why would you believe they can go to the moon now?
If man couldn't fly in an airplane in 1616 why would you believe they can fly in them now? I sure hope you have never been on an airplane since you clearly don't believe in them using your logic.
 
Back
Top