Search warrant being executed on Mira Largo

Stone said:
hmm......I wonder if there is precedent for the kind of thing. Why yes...yes there is. Former Clinton chief of staff Sandy Berger on the heels of his Chinese Stolen Nuclear weapons scandal was caught red handed stealing classified Docs by hiding them in his shoes. How was he penalized? He was given a fine and put on probation for a couple of years. :thinking:
Click to expand...

In this case it sounds like Trump has been in violation of the National Archives Records statute conviction of which is conviction of a felonious offense and would prohibit him from running for President. Put a smiley on that.
 
Last edited:
Nixon resigns

n an evening televised address on August 8, 1974, President Richard M. Nixon announces his intention to become the first president in American history to resign. With impeachment proceedings underway against him for his involvement in the Watergate affair, Nixon was finally bowing to pressure from the public and Congress to leave the White House.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/nixon-resigns
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Some observations about this:

It is unprecedented in all of US history. That makes it significant.
What is the DoJ's next step?

Think about that. What if the DoJ fails to charge Trump with something, anything? That pretty much says the Progressive Left and the radical Leftists in Joke's administration just assfucked themselves in November and 2024.
If they charge Trump with something, what would it be? Could they make a convincing case? Outside the True Believers on the Left, the rest of the public doesn't give a shit, thinks there's nothing there, or supports Trump. Again, it's an uphill battle for the Left and they better damn well have an airtight case.

What I personally see is this is a taste of some Third-World Junta-like dictator's move to take out the opposition just before an election. What's next, putting Trump on house arrest? It used to be our Presidents and leaders in Congress condemned nations that acted like that. Now, they're the ones doing it...
Click to expand...

We will see… but don’t expect anything before November. We will eventually find out why the FBI got this warrant and what info it was based on, Im waiting to pass judgment, but doing this without a sold basis would be stupid and Merck Garland is not stupid.
 
Jarod said:
We will see… but don’t expect anything before November. We will eventually find out why the FBI got this warrant and what info it was based on, Im waiting to pass judgment, but doing this without a sold basis would be stupid and Merck Garland is not stupid.
Click to expand...

Yes. I love it!
 
Stone said:
hmm......I wonder if there is precedent for the kind of thing. Why yes...yes there is. Former Clinton chief of staff Sandy Berger on the heels of his Chinese Stolen Nuclear weapons scandal was caught red handed stealing classified Docs by hiding them in his shoes. How was he penalized? He was given a fine and put on probation for a couple of years. :thinking:
Click to expand...

The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president would have been approved and monitored at the highest level of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to initiate such a politically sensitive search.
 
Jarod said:
We will see… but don’t expect anything before November. We will eventually find out why the FBI got this warrant and what info it was based on, Im waiting to pass judgment, but doing this without a sold basis would be stupid and Merck Garland is not stupid.
Click to expand...

Merrick Garland is stupid. Aside from that, the FBI had to give Trump--or whoever was present--a copy of that warrant so we'll know what was on it in, my guess, less than 72 hours. I also don't buy they had to have a solid basis for getting it. The radical Left often does incredibly stupid stuff because of their myopic belief they can do no wrong and are always justified.
 
floridafan said:
Listen Bitch, you cheered when the announcement came just prior to the presidential election, that Hillary Clinton was again being investigated by James Comey and the FBI.
Click to expand...

The FBI didn't swoop in and scoop up all of the Hildabeast's illegal e-mail servers in her home did they? They did nothing when she deleted over 31,000 e-mails. The FBI didn't raid the Clinton's home after they looted the White House on leaving. Instead, they were allowed to give the stuff back and pay a $92,000 bill (aka fine) for taking it.

So, you are trying to compare apples to space shuttles.
 
Stone said:
In the end this will NOT go well for Democrats. When one party crosses a line the other goes a step further at a time convenient to them and to their advantage
Click to expand...

There is no side. A judge ruled that there was probable cause to believe evidence of a crime was at the location. Because there IS evidence of a crime. Destroying public records. Bye, bye.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Merrick Garland is stupid. Aside from that, the FBI had to give Trump--or whoever was present--a copy of that warrant so we'll know what was on it in, my guess, less than 72 hours. I also don't buy they had to have a solid basis for getting it. The radical Left often does incredibly stupid stuff because of their myopic belief they can do no wrong and are always justified.
Click to expand...

Worried?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The FBI didn't swoop in and scoop up all of the Hildabeast's illegal e-mail servers in her home did they? They did nothing when she deleted over 31,000 e-mails. The FBI didn't raid the Clinton's home after they looted the White House on leaving. Instead, they were allowed to give the stuff back and pay a $92,000 bill (aka fine) for taking it.

So, you are trying to compare apples to space shuttles.
Click to expand...

Nothing even closely compares to a former President stealing documents from the White House for who knows what purpose. Then on top of that the documented destruction of many documents. Now the real kicker sweetie, if Donald is convicted of these crimes he would be barred from ever holding public office again
 
AProudLefty said:
Yes. That's why they are stopping it. GQP and Trump need to be gone. They're cancer to America.
Click to expand...

Hardly.

I could imagine this from the Joke administration at this point:

In the next few weeks, the DoJ keeps saying it's reviewing what it took from Trump but announces nothing. Then in late September to mid-October the DoJ announces raids on half-a-dozen Republican candidates in key races in several states claiming the documents they have show (fill in the blank here with vague charges) they had to raid these people's homes, campaign offices, etc.
The MSM and Democrats start shouting about how those Republicans were involved in (whatever crime they want to claim) and shouldn't be elected.

At the same time, the Jan 6 committee leaks all sorts of stuff they think will damage various Republican races for office.

It isn't that farfetched...
 
floridafan said:
Nothing even closely compares to a former President stealing documents from the White House for who knows what purpose. Then on top of that the documented destruction of many documents. Now the real kicker sweetie, if Donald is convicted of these crimes he would be barred from ever holding public office again
Click to expand...

So, the Hildabeast didn't do exactly that by routing all her e-mail to an illegal personal server rather than a government one like the law requires?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Merrick Garland is stupid. Aside from that, the FBI had to give Trump--or whoever was present--a copy of that warrant so we'll know what was on it in, my guess, less than 72 hours. I also don't buy they had to have a solid basis for getting it. The radical Left often does incredibly stupid stuff because of their myopic belief they can do no wrong and are always justified.
Click to expand...

Trump was the one announcing the raid , doesn't matter what you think or believe . We are a nation of laws

so much for you braying about a nothing burger
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Hardly.

I could imagine this from the Joke administration at this point:

In the next few weeks, the DoJ keeps saying it's reviewing what it took from Trump but announces nothing. Then in late September to mid-October the DoJ announces raids on half-a-dozen Republican candidates in key races in several states claiming the documents they have show (fill in the blank here with vague charges) they had to raid these people's homes, campaign offices, etc.
The MSM and Democrats start shouting about how those Republicans were involved in (whatever crime they want to claim) and shouldn't be elected.

At the same time, the Jan 6 committee leaks all sorts of stuff they think will damage various Republican races for office.

It isn't that farfetched...
Click to expand...
Totally
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Merrick Garland is stupid. Aside from that, the FBI had to give Trump--or whoever was present--a copy of that warrant so we'll know what was on it in, my guess, less than 72 hours. I also don't buy they had to have a solid basis for getting it. The radical Left often does incredibly stupid stuff because of their myopic belief they can do no wrong and are always justified.
Click to expand...

We will find out in a few months if there was a good basis for it, so hold your tongue till then.

If Trump has access to this warrant, why didn't he post it when he announced that it happened. Its very likely that its because it does not back his story and he knows the FBI wont leak it. Trump takes advantage of their integrity. You are too stupid to ask these reasonable questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top