YOU were the one that said there was no right to know. Not me.
You don't.
Anne Heche in Critical condition with burns.
- Thread starter ExpressLane
- Start date
You don't.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Yes we do because we know Pelosi's information.
Again, the court records are public. Indictments are public too. Courts are usually open to the public.
ExpressLane
Verified User
So sometimes the public has the right to know.
When they are indicted, yes.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Glad that you admit there is a right to know.
Glad that you admit there is a right to know.
I never denied that.
ExpressLane
Verified User
You said there was no right to know. Clearly there is and you were wrong.
I said that the public has the right to know about indictments. That's why they're public record.
So what are you trying to say.....that anything not a part of the criminal justice system we dont have a right to know?
Think hard.
If she causes harm with a firearm sure, here she caused harm with a Mini Cooper.
We have no right to know everything about her situation. If she drove drunk, it will be up to DA to make a move and bring it to the Grand Jury. She is suffering right now so it is not the time to add insult to the injury.
Your objection is noted.
What objection?
To my beliefs on the subject dummy.
There is nothing to object. You have not shown why or how it is your right to know everything about Anne's situation.
Obviously you dont understand the meaning of the word object.
This does not particularly come as a shock.
You said you have the right to know if she was drunk or was high when she was driving.
Exactly. A compassionate person days “I’m glad nobody was killed, I hope she recovers and if she needs help, she gets it.” Done.
Nothing about that absurd “I have a right to know.”
Nothing was said about any harm caused by her car. The post was that if she had a psychotic break, she should lose her license.