What's your most important issue today?

:wrongkiddo:

I absolutely do, Frankie. Furthermore I am unrestricted in my thinking by any TDS suppressing my cognitive function, unlike yourself.

You are restricted in your thinking by the fact that you thinking apparatus is defective. If it weren't, you would never mention Trump's name in a positive way.

You are a dupe...a stooge...a patsy. I am beginning to doubt you will ever be anything more.
 
Luddite thinking. Which is worth more money, Matt: A ton of hammers or a ton of computer chips? 2200 lbs of jeans or a Cirrus SR22 aircraft?

People who think the US, a nation of 330M people can turn the clock back to the Civil War when the US population was 25M are fucking morons. Americans need to improvise, adapt and overcome in the modern world if we want to be among the leading nations. Running and hiding in a closet is both a temporary solution and a losing strategy.

You don't know the first fucking thing about "improvise, adapt, and overcome", and you were never a leader of men, you fucking squid pussy motherfucker.

No CO in their right mind would put you in charge of anything more important than potatoes.
 
wrong.

you're what we call a globalist zealot.

your kind will be executed in the dirt like dogs unless you quit your bullshit.

We are the people of the land. and this land was made for you and me.

You talk hatred of what you term "globalists"...but you either are a globalist...or you are decidedly anti-capitalist.

You choose.

Any capitalist worth his/her salt would laugh at your "ideas"...even if you baked them for another hour or so.
 
You don't know the first fucking thing about "improvise, adapt, and overcome", and you were never a leader of men, you fucking squid pussy motherfucker.

No CO in their right mind would put you in charge of anything more important than potatoes.

Do you feel better now that you've lied and vented your hatred of others online, Matt? No doubt your life was full of pain and still is as you near the end of your life's thread. Sad.
 
Get off your bullshit.

"Trump's tariffs" are more of his con. If Trump could make a dollar more by buying foreign, he would do it no matter what. You are an idiot to think Trump has ever done anything that was anything other than primarily for his personal benefit.

We needed tariffs for years before Trump. It would have been nice if Bush and Clinton didn't foist NAFTA upon as well.

Are you aware the Federal government used to be funded solely by tariffs and there was no income tax, Frank?
 
Do you feel better now that you've lied and vented your hatred of others online, Matt? No doubt your life was full of pain and still is as you near the end of your life's thread. Sad.

What did I lie about, Dutchy? Hmm? You espousing concepts that do not come from the branch of service you claim you served in?

iu


That's not a jarhead slogan Dutchy. You claim to be a jarhead, no?

One of us can meet the pullup requirement for jarheads, and it ain't you.
 
Last edited:
You talk hatred of what you term "globalists"...but you either are a globalist...or you are decidedly anti-capitalist.

You choose.

Any capitalist worth his/her salt would laugh at your "ideas"...even if you baked them for another hour or so.

false dichotomy fallacy.

no good argument presented.
 
We needed tariffs for years before Trump. It would have been nice if Bush and Clinton didn't foist NAFTA upon as well.

Are you aware the Federal government used to be funded solely by tariffs and there was no income tax, Frank?

If you think tariffs are going to make the global economy any less global...you are nuts, Matt.

And that is the important thing.
 
What did I lie about, Dutchy?…

Aside from the obvious fact you have no personal knowledge of my service record, there’s this:
You don't know the first fucking thing about "improvise, adapt, and overcome", and you were never a leader of men, you fucking squid pussy motherfucker.

No CO in their right mind would put you in charge of anything more important than potatoes.
No worries, Matt, since, like several others on JPP, I know that you are old, lonely and addled.
 
No, I am not.

Joe Biden is a better choice than Trump. (No big deal, Big Bird is a better choice than Trump.)

But fuel prices, inflation, possible recession...are all world-wide problems, EE. They are not the result of a change of administrations.

I have NEVER blamed any president or congress for rising prices or rising unemployment. To do so is an absurdity...because presidents and congresses have very limited influence over those kinds of macro-economic moves. (I am not saying "none"...but VERY LITTLE.)

And I have NEVER ascribed kudos to any president or congress for prices staying or employment staying stable...for the same reason.

I hope things improve...but if things do get better, it will be for reasons way beyond the control of a president or congress.

Frank your hero's polls are dropping
The Gallup poll found that 38 percent of voters approve of Biden’s job as president, down from 41 percent last month. In comparison, the president started out his term at 57 percent approval in January 2021.

Broken down by party, 78 percent of Democrats, 31 percent of independents and 5 percent of Republicans surveyed gave the president a thumbs up. The polling shows a 7 percent decline in approval among Democrats since they were last polled in June and a 5 percent decrease among independents.
Gallup also compared Biden’s average approval rating in the sixth quarter to that of elected presidents going back to former President Eisenhower, noting that Biden had the lowest average approval rating of them all at this point in the presidency at 40 percent.
Former Presidents Trump and Carter had the next lowest average approval rating in the sixth quarter at 42 percent, while former President George W. Bush had the highest average at that point at 75 percent.

The poll is more bad news for the president, who has continued to be mired in low approval ratings, one of several political headwinds facing Democrats ahead of the November midterms.

The Gallup poll was conducted between July 5 and July 26 with 1,013 adults surveyed. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d5f010a3cebf4a7ca2bb7d6df56c6f8a

Even his own party is disappointed. So much for your global excuses.
 
You said it had to be all or nothing, not me.

Oh, I thought you were talking about your comment, "false dichotomy fallacy. no good argument presented."

That comment is absurd...but typical for you.

As for my comment, I was right on the button.

Let's see if you can actually answer a question which will show your "arguments" to be ridiculous.

FIRST, a predicate: I am assuming you do realize that our government does not outsource jobs, but that American corporations do that by buying goods from other countries. If I am wrong (that you do not realize that), let me know.

Now...are you saying that American corporation have, or should assume, a social obligation...that they should not outsource, but should instead only operate in a way that maximizes American jobs...even if it means earning less in the way of profits for their shareholders?
 
Oh, I thought you were talking about your comment, "false dichotomy fallacy. no good argument presented."

That comment is absurd...but typical for you.

As for my comment, I was right on the button.

Let's see if you can actually answer a question which will show your "arguments" to be ridiculous.

FIRST, a predicate: I am assuming you do realize that our government does not outsource jobs, but that American corporations do that by buying goods from other countries. If I am wrong (that you do not realize that), let me know.

Now...are you saying that American corporation have, or should assume, a social obligation...that they should not outsource, but should instead only operate in a way that maximizes American jobs...even if it means earning less in the way of profits for their shareholders?

international corps don't just "buy" from overseas, they invest in the infrastructure and hire the labor there as well.

they pay to utilize human slavery.

i do think corporations who sell in the united states should be limited to hiring in the united states for production, at least in the case of incentivizing human slavery abroad.
 
international corps don't just "buy" from overseas, they invest in the infrastructure and hire the labor there as well.

they pay to utilize human slavery.

i do think corporations who sell in the united states should be limited to hiring in the united states for production, at least in the case of incentivizing human slavery abroad.

Nice deflection and non-answer.

NOW...TRY TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
 

globalist hogwash.

but thanks.

neocon think tanks are so late 90's.

:magagrin:
 
Last edited:
i have.

yes i think companies should have a loyalty to the nation and peoples that made them.

but since that apparently isnt enough, tariffs are in order.

Now we are getting somewhere, AssWipe.

So you do think American corporations have, or should assume, a social obligation...that they should not outsource, but should instead only operate in a way that maximizes American jobs...even if it means earning less in the way of profits for their shareholders?

Holy shit!

Ain't that a fine position for a capitalist to take!

And impose more tariffs...even though the economic sources I cited say they did a hell of a lot more damage than good for our nation...

....because YOU are a much better economist than the people from Brookings, Carnegie, or Forbes.

Wow. Who woulda thunk that a Trump supporter would have that big an ego.

Jesus H. Christ, AssWipe...do you realize how much a chump you are making yourself look...with minimum help from me?
 
Back
Top