At least 60 days in the can!

She was held in contempt of Congress..twice I believe, never saw the inside of a cell.

They got her IT guy..he fell on the sword for her, I guess.
Care to find a source that shows the House voting to hold her in contempt?
Until you can find an actual vote by the House, your argument is nothing but bullshit that is pulled from your own ass.

Here is a story you can probably believe of the House voting to hold Bannon in contempt.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/gop-house-contempt-congress/2021/10/21/id/1041521/
 
Eric Holder was a member of the administration at the time he was accused of contempt. You will notice that the DoJ refused to prosecute Meadows and Scavino because they were members of the administration. It looks like the problem is that the DoJ is using the same standard.
Holder didn't really qualify for executive privilege they did. Bannon also didn't really qualify for executive privilege.
 
Last edited:
The House passed the infrastructure bill. The House has passed a lot of bills that are being held up in the Senate by GOP filibusters. If you were better informed you might be able to make better arguments.

Bitch, shove your wannabe sophistry right up your ass sideways alongside a cactus.

Fuck You!

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...

You think this Punch & Judy show is good for the Democrats, but actually it's going to blow up in their faces like something Wile E. Coyote ordered from

ACME.

iu


wiley-coyote.gif


Btw, that infrastructure was bad news and thankfully a lot of the pork was gutted from it.
 
Last edited:
Bitch, shove your wannabe sophistry right up your ass sideways alongside a cactus.

Fuck You!

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...

You think this Punch & Judy show is good for the Democrats, but actually it's going to blow up in their faces like something Wile E. Coyote ordered from

ACME.

iu

And your sophistry is not wannabe. It's very real prevarication.
 
Holder didn't really qualify for executive privilege they did. Bannon also didn't really qualify for executive privilege.

Eric Holder
82nd United States Attorney General
In office
February 3, 2009 – April 27, 2015

So a member of the cabinet doesn't qualify for executive privilege but a deputy chief of staff for communication does?

ROFLMAO... OK.. Try to sell that one to a reasonable person.
 
Eric Holder
82nd United States Attorney General
In office
February 3, 2009 – April 27, 2015

So a member of the cabinet doesn't qualify for executive privilege but a deputy chief of staff for communication does?

ROFLMAO... OK.. Try to sell that one to a reasonable person.
Holder wasn't advising Obama about Fast and Furious.
 
The hearings on the January 6th insurrection prove one thing that we already know.

If Trump disgusts you, i.e... if you're a civilized human being,
he disgusted you LONG, LONG before the January 6 insurrection.

If Trump doesn't disgust you, i.e,,,you're a devolved mutant,
you think that the insurrection was totally justified.

NO MINDS GET CHANGED BY FACTS.
Why do people fail to accept this?
 
The hearings on the January 6th insurrection prove one thing that we already know.

If Trump disgusts you, i.e... if you're a civilized human being,
he disgusted you LONG, LONG before the January 6 insurrection.

If Trump doesn't disgust you, i.e,,,you're a devolved mutant,
you think that the insurrection was totally justified.

NO MINDS GET CHANGED BY FACTS.
Why do people fail to accept this?

False Dichotomy fallacy, fucktard.

There are many other options, you're just too myopic to see them.
 
Steve Bannon, hahahaha!

It's going to the SCOTUS where he will win because the DC show trial wouldn't allow him to mount the defense of Executive Privilege and wouldn't allow him to face his accusers so go goosestep off a f-ing cliff.
 
Obama criticized the use of criticized his predecessor George W. Bush for using the power, saying Bush had a tendency "to hide behind executive privilege every time there's something a little shaky that's taking place."

So it was good enough for Bush but not for Obama? And now it is good enough for Meadows and Scavino and Trump?

Maybe you should find a standard you want to apply equally instead of based on partisanship.
 
No he's pointing out YOUR hypocrisy you illiterate retard

It didn't point out any hypocrisy on my part.
Holder wasn't charged with criminal contempt while working in the administration.
Meadows and Scavino weren't charged with criminal contempt while working in the administration.
What hypocrisy do you see there?
 
You people are all nuts.

But you are so entertaining, the only reasonable thing to do is to encourage you to post as often as possible.

Keep 'em coming, Lionfish.

You run like Howley the second reality shows up. Why do you try to create a false reality?
 
You people are all nuts.

But you are so entertaining, the only reasonable thing to do is to encourage you to post as often as possible.

Keep 'em coming, Lionfish.

TBH, I see Lionfish as being more young and ignorant than batshit crazy like TDAK, Truth Detector and Sybil.

Something like this:

6dyui0.jpg
 
Back
Top