Missing the point on mass shootings.

PostmodernProphet said:
you can't even remember all the stupid crap you posted last weel.......you've always been one of the posters who's embarrassed the demmycunts the most.......
Click to expand...

Well I don't have CTE like you do, so I can remember what I wrote.

You can't...you just imagine what people write because it's easy to do that and you're a lazy person.

The image I gave you was an embryo and you know how I know that? Because it has defined features but is still in a membrane.
 
LV426 said:
Democrats passed the Civil Rights Act. Most Republicans voted against it. Only 1 Southern Republican voted for it. ONLY 1.
Click to expand...

I love it when you prove how stupid you are.......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#:~:text=The%20final%20vote%20was%20290,House%20on%20July%202%2C%201964.

By party

The record of the roll call vote kept by the House Clerk on final passage of the bill
The original House version:[36]

Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[37]

Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[36]

Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[36]

Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
Click to expand...

also from the above....
When the bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964, the "Southern Bloc" of 18 southern Democratic Senators and lone Republican John Tower of Texas, led by Richard Russell, launched a filibuster to prevent its passage.[28] Russell proclaimed, "We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would tend to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our [Southern] states."[29][30]
Click to expand...

Senator Robert Byrd ended his filibuster in opposition to the bill on the morning of June 10, 1964, after 14 hours and 13 minutes. Up to then, the measure had occupied the Senate for 60 working days, including six Saturdays.
Click to expand...

you remember Byrd, right?.......
 
LV426 said:
What part of the NRA's position on firearms do you disagree with?

What positions of the teacher's unions are political and professional that you disagree with?
Click to expand...

These parts:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=17e8052e2be044949db867be1997e710

https://www.aft.org/

Bullying
Collective Bargaining
College Affordability
COVID-19
Diversity & Inclusion
Education Funding
English Language Learning
Federal Legislation
Gun Violence
Immigration
Mental Health
Politics & Campaigns
Privatization
Racial & Social Justice
School Climate
Trauma
Workplace Conditions
Click to expand...
https://www.nea.org/

Teacher unions that aren't concerned about teaching but rather about politics, money, and political correctness...

That's a start.
 
LV426 said:
Democrats passed the Civil Rights Act. Most Republicans voted against it. Only 1 Southern Republican voted for it. ONLY 1.
Click to expand...

" With a little research, the actual voting record for both Houses of Congress shows that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed the Senate on a 73-to-27 vote. The Democratic supermajority in the Senate split their vote 46 (69%) for and 21 (31%) against. The Republicans, on the other hand, split their vote 27 for (82%) and 6 against (18%). Thus, the no vote consisted of 78% Democrats. Further, the infamous 74-day filibuster was led by the Southern Democrats, who overwhelmingly voted against the act.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1041302509432817073

So, when it comes down to percentages, you are a liar. As always.
 
LV426 said:
Antifa has never killed anyone, let alone cops...but you know who has? Your right-wing pals.

Man tied to Boogaloo movement gets 41 years for killing federal officer
https://www.police1.com/legal/artic...for-killing-federal-officer-7yIMyMlhKqA7OXhx/

I seem to remember your stupid ass running your mouth on JPP during the summer of 2020 that antifa was responsible for killing cops.

Turns out antifa weren't the cop killers, your JPP friends were.
Click to expand...

"How a Portland radical murdered a Trump supporter — and became a hero for Antifa"

https://nypost.com/2021/01/30/how-a-portland-radical-murdered-a-trump-supporter/

This guy tried:

https://www.ammoland.com/2019/01/an...-police-after-opening-fire-on-officers-video/

This guy tried too:



"On Saturday, a 69-year-old man named Willem van Spronsen, 69, of Vashon Island, was shot dead by police outside the Northwest Detention Center, a jail for immigrants in Tacoma.

He'd set fire to a car, and he was equipped with flares and a rifle. In a manifesto, he wrote:

When I was a boy, in post-war Holland, later France, my head was filled with stories of the rise of fascism in the ’30s. I promised myself that I would not be one of those who stands by as neighbors are torn from their homes and imprisoned for somehow being perceived as lesser."

https://www.kuow.org/stories/his-he...rthwest-detention-center-reflects-on-his-life

Part of the reason ANTIFA doesn't kill more is because they can't shoot for shit:

"Man with alleged ties to antifa arrested on charges of shooting Proud Boy at anti-vaccine protest"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...o&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=yahoo_feed



And fuck all ANTIFA and BLM and Biden and Harris:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/...nths-of-antifa-blm-looting-rioting-and-chaos/
 
Last edited:
LV426 said:
Look, I get it with you...you're a simple person who can only think in simple terms, and the terms within which you are thinking here is that shooting someone is the appropriate response to any act of criminality, no matter its scale, size, motivation, or magnitude.
Click to expand...

:chuckle:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
These parts:
Click to expand...

OK, so here's another example of precisely what I'm talking about with you...you don't do the work. You just copy and paste work other people did and expect that is enough.

So I don't understand what you're saying here, how are these policies and what of these policies is it you oppose?


Bullying
Collective Bargaining
College Affordability
COVID-19
Diversity & Inclusion
Education Funding
English Language Learning
Federal Legislation
Gun Violence
Immigration
Mental Health
Politics & Campaigns
Privatization
Racial & Social Justice
School Climate
Trauma
Workplace Conditions

Teacher unions that aren't concerned about teaching but rather about politics, money, and political correctness...
Click to expand...

But all of those things impact a teacher's ability to teach.

And you didn't explain what policies those are that you actually disagree with...it's like you haven't done the work.
 
Matt Dillon said:
""On Saturday, a 69-year-old man named Willem van Spronsen, 69, of Vashon Island, was shot dead by police outside the Northwest Detention Center, a jail for immigrants in Tacoma.
Click to expand...

So in your attempt to paint antifa and BLM as violent you...posted an article of an elderly antifascist being killed by police.

So how does that prove BLM and antifa kill people?
 
LV426 said:
OK, so here's another example of precisely what I'm talking about with you...you don't do the work. You just copy and paste work other people did and expect that is enough.

So I don't understand what you're saying here, how are these policies and what of these policies is it you oppose?




But all of those things impact a teacher's ability to teach.

And you didn't explain what policies those are that you actually disagree with...it's like you haven't done the work.
Click to expand...

The whole damn list! Which part of that don't you get? Teacher's unions are about politics, their member's benefits, and increasing their power. They don't give a shit about students or education. Is that clear enough for you?
 
Matt Dillon said:
"How a Portland radical murdered a Trump supporter — and became a hero for Antifa"
Click to expand...

So the sum total of your pussy rebuttal is...

One article showing self defense, and two articles barely showing "tries", with one of those who was trying actually shot and killed by cops, not vice versa.

You're not very bright.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Which part of that don't you get?
Click to expand...

The part where you actually did the work to know what it is you oppose and why.

I don't believe you've done that work.

You didn't do that work when it came to HR 1, so why the fuck should I believe you've done the work here, when you can't even articulate one policy you oppose and why you oppose it.

Instead, we get a lazy generalization from you, devoid of details and facts.

I think you keep things vague and ambiguous by design because you're a total fuckin' fraud.


Teacher's unions are about politics, their member's benefits, and increasing their power.
Click to expand...

How are they "about politics"? All unions are inherently political.

And of course they are about member benefits, that is the point of the union.

How are they about increasing their power and to what end are they increasing it?


They don't give a shit about students or education.
Click to expand...

How do you know that? They're not the ones defunding schools, you are.
 
 
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, I oppose unions imposing their politics on education.
Click to expand...

But you said you oppose collective bargaining...it was on the list you said you opposed:

T. A. Gardner said:
Collective Bargaining
Click to expand...

So did you do what I knew you were gonna do and hastily copy and paste something without bothering to vet it?

You said you opposed collective bargaining as it was "on the list".

So now you're going back on what you said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top