Hearsay

[Nomad]

Those people who are screeching about Cassidy's testimony being a hearsay are the same people who swallow the claim that a "source" said those two SS agents will testify and deny her testimony.

See: Cognitive dissonance

They're the same brainless rwnj assholes who believed every nutjob conspiracy about Democrats that came down the right-wing sewer pipe without a shred of evidence, too.

 

[floridafan]

her credibility has been called into question.......until this is resolved it should be treated as if she has not yet testified......you people may yet turn out to be right.......it has never happened before in your lifetime but there always remains a possibility......until then it only makes you look foolish to deny what has happened......

Your credibility was called into question long ago, but you are still allowed to post lies every single day.

 

[Lionfish]

Those people who are screeching about Cassidy's testimony being a hearsay are the same people who swallow the claim that a "source" said those two SS agents will testify and deny her testimony.

See: Cognitive dissonance

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello AProudLefty,

Those people who are screeching about Cassidy's testimony being a hearsay are the same people who swallow the claim that a "source" said those two SS agents will testify and deny her testimony.

See: Cognitive dissonance

One side of the story is sworn testimony.

The other side would be more than welcome to do the same.

There can be only one reason that is not happening.

Swearing to tell the truth under threat of perjury.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Your credibility was called into question long ago, but you are still allowed to post lies every single day.

and yet I've proved what I've posted........you haven't......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Hello AProudLefty,



One side of the story is sworn testimony.

The other side would be more than welcome to do the same.

There can be only one reason that is not happening.

Swearing to tell the truth under threat of perjury.

lol.....maybe a better reason is that the committee hasn't called the two SS officers as witnesses......now given its only been about thirty hours, I'm not really faulting them for that......I would however, point out that you're a fucking idiot for thinking you had a point....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Secret Service officials: Agents willing to dispute Trump SUV incident under oath


Officials from the US Secret Service have announced that Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel, the agents named in Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, are willing to testify before the Jan. 6 committee and dispute Hutchinson's account of an alleged incident involving then-President Trump.


https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics...px.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

Officials from the US Secret Service have announced ,,,,,is not hearsay

you can't expect them to believe something from a right wing rag like CNN, do you?......

 

[floridafan]

and yet I've proved what I've posted........you haven't......

You have never proven anything, just lies and misinformation. Its all you are good for- nothing!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

from the out takes of the testimony I have heard, Hutchinson "said something to the effect of" I made this up.........

 

[PostmodernProphet]

You have never proven anything, just lies and misinformation. Its all you are good for- nothing!

yes.....I am good for you.......I am the best thing for you and the other nothings right now......the truth.....

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Lionfish]

 

[AProudLefty]

Yep I saw that tweet. Very hilarious.

 

[martin]

Her "testimony" was literally hearsay.

One of the fearful Trumpers who avoided watching and hearing what they wouldn’t like telling us about the testimony.

 

[anatta]

One of the fearful Trumpers who avoided watching and hearing what they wouldn’t like telling us about the testimony.

you dont have to watch the freak show to know the testimony was all hearsay, with a couple exceptions,
and that was a lie about the note

 

[AProudLefty]

you dont have to watch the freak show to know the testimony was all hearsay, with a couple exceptions,
and that was a lie about the note

So you don't believe Peter Alexander either?

 

[martin]

you dont have to watch the freak show to know the testimony was all hearsay, with a couple exceptions,
and that was a lie about the note

Actually you did have to watch if you intended to form an opinion based on what happened instead of what you hoped would happen. Apparently you're among the legion of Trumpers in the "hoped would happen" category. Nearly all of her testimony was direct.

 

[Earl]

Actually you did have to watch if you intended to form an opinion based on what happened instead of what you hoped would happen. Apparently you're among the legion of Trumpers in the "hoped would happen" category. Nearly all of her testimony was direct.

No, Marty, it wasn't.

 

[martin]

Yes, asshole, it was. Nevertheless, hearsay evidence is commonly introduced in non judicial hearings. You counter it with credible rebuttal if you have it.