Hearsay

THE SS and the driver will not be subpoenaed by the Democrat clown show, because it would expose perjury.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
for the last time, then I'm writing you off as a total idiot.......she did not participate in the incident in the limo......I know that, you know that, the committee that had her testify about it knew that, every judge and lawyer in the country knows that.......we know that because she told us that......which means she cannot testify to what happened in the limo......her saying "I had a conversation" is an exception because she was a participant......when she starts talking about what happened in the limo, based on what she claims he told her is NOT an exception to the hearsay rule because she was NOT a participant to what happened in the limo......

now don't bother responding to me again, since I won't bother answering you......
Click to expand...

Sorry but you are full of shit and hearsay is clearly evidence. Especially if the party to which she is referring to as being there does not dispute what she said.
 
volsrock said:
Secret Service officials: Agents willing to dispute Trump SUV incident under oath


Officials from the US Secret Service have announced that Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel, the agents named in Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, are willing to testify before the Jan. 6 committee and dispute Hutchinson's account of an alleged incident involving then-President Trump.


https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics...px.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

Officials from the US Secret Service have announced ,,,,,is not hearsay
Click to expand...

If and when they testify then maybe her testimony concerning the incident will be questioned. Who knows, the agent may say yeah I told her a story but in actuality he didn't reach for the wheel or assault anyone in which case her testimony is 100% credible.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....maybe a better reason is that the committee hasn't called the two SS officers as witnesses......now given its only been about thirty hours, I'm not really faulting them for that......I would however, point out that you're a fucking idiot for thinking you had a point....
Click to expand...

Both agents have already interviewed with the committee.
 
Her hearsay testimony will be questioned after November.

The Republicans are telling the panel to retain all documents and testimony.
 
martin said:
Having tried law cases, I do know. She relayed what she was told about the incident in the vehicle.
Click to expand...

if in fact you ARE a lawyer, you know that she would never be allowed to testify to what she was told.......the fact you would even post this contradicts your claim to be a lawyer.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
if in fact you ARE a lawyer, you know that she would never be allowed to testify to what she was told.......the fact you would even post this contradicts your claim to be a lawyer.......
Click to expand...

It was a Congressional hearing, not a trial. There are no rules of evidence. As mentioned before, hearsay testimony in nonjudicial proceedings is commonplace, and as for contradictions, someone who boasts of being "fully immersed in faith" is all but embedded in hearsay.
 
AProudLefty said:
Deny what? She was a participant in the conversation.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Trump's terrorists and Satanic cocksuckers will continue to attack Cassidy's credibility based solely on a hearsay story without a word about her comments regarding Trump's desire to let armed militia follow him to the Capitol.

I hope all of Trump's terrorists and those who materially supported the attempted coup will face the full wrath of American justice.

6jzbg2.jpg
 
Earl said:
Her hearsay testimony will be questioned after November.

The Republicans are telling the panel to retain all documents and testimony.
Click to expand...

Why do the people who could corroborate her story keep taking the Fifth?

Did you support the coup, Earl? Have you given money to WSE groups? Are you a terrorist? A traitor to your oath?

2h1bqc.jpg
 
martin said:
It was a Congressional hearing, not a trial. There are no rules of evidence. As mentioned before, hearsay testimony in nonjudicial proceedings is commonplace, and as for contradictions, someone who boasts of being "fully immersed in faith" is all but embedded in hearsay.
Click to expand...

so we all agree that what you hear in congressional hearings is not evidence.......I am glad we are making progress.........now, explain why we are wasting time collecting this non-evidence.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so we all agree that what you hear in congressional hearings is not evidence.......I am glad we are making progress.........now, explain why we are wasting time collecting this non-evidence.......
Click to expand...

I said "rules of evidence". Hearsay is "hearsay evidence". Look it up instead of showing the board how little you know.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so we all agree that what you hear in congressional hearings is not evidence.......I am glad we are making progress.........now, explain why we are wasting time collecting this non-evidence.......
Click to expand...

Which is why the committee is turning over all of their evidence to the DOJ for prosecution.

6lh6ri.gif
 
martin said:
Having tried law cases, I do know. She relayed what she was told about the incident in the vehicle. Trump's bellowing that the armed members of the mob weren't there to hurt him she heard herself, as was the majority of what she said direct testimony.
Click to expand...
she has no credibility..she over reached, and if the committee calls either driver or SS agent, she's gonna be impeached again
If they dont ( which they wont) then she still has no credibility..they blew themselves up
 
anatta said:
she has no credibility..she over reached, and if the committee calls either driver or SS agent, she's gonna be impeached again
If they dont ( which they wont) then she still has no credibility..they blew themselves up
Click to expand...

What made her not credible?
 
anatta said:
she has no credibility..she over reached, and if the committee calls either driver or SS agent, she's gonna be impeached again
If they dont ( which they wont) then she still has no credibility..they blew themselves up
Click to expand...

Hope springs eternal within the human breast.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top