They don;t even hide their racism anymore

That’s not damage control. I purposefully posted a MSNBC progressive clarifying what Coryn was saying because many people are choosing to misinterpret it.

Choosing?


It was pretty ambiguous


Easy to misinterpret



Like do them just like we did Roe



Chris being the bright fair mind he is showed people the true racism being spewed by the clown
 
He claimed he wanted Obama to support the racists who lost precedent when those cases knocked it down on their heads



Fucking racist as hell
 
No one said the Roe reversal was.....but pointing to yet another part of the American situation that revolves around personal choice of education for you and your kids vs. gov't determination that could come under fire with this current mindset. Trying to equate the two to justify removing "choice" from a personal medical situation is a-typical christo-fascist/right wing wonk tactic. Convoluted logic at it's best.

Those cases devastated racists prior precedent


It made the racists really sad to lose those



He wanted the first black president to show the same love to those old racists


It was fucking sick
 
I have read his tweet already. He is defending him. Let the Senator explain himself, not some random asskisser.

Do you agree that it's ambiguous and that he is a master communicator?

It's not ambiguous you're just stupid, Brown reversed the precedent of Plessy.
 
No one said the Roe reversal was.....but pointing to yet another part of the American situation that revolves around personal choice of education for you and your kids vs. gov't determination that could come under fire with this current mindset. Trying to equate the two to justify removing "choice" from a personal medical situation is a-typical christo-fascist/right wing wonk tactic. Convoluted logic at it's best.

I’ll throw this out there:

 
Do you know what those two decisions were about? And why tweet that reply to a black ex-President? It's a deliberate ambiguity to cause further division.

That misses the point. It is to show reversing precedent is not necessarily a bad thing, such as Brown v. Board.

See Cornyn's other tweets.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No one said the Roe reversal was.....but pointing to yet another part of the American situation that revolves around personal choice of education for you and your kids vs. gov't determination that could come under fire with this current mindset. Trying to equate the two to justify removing "choice" from a personal medical situation is a-typical christo-fascist/right wing wonk tactic. Convoluted logic at it's best.


I’ll throw this out there:


regardless, I'll stand by my previous post.
 
That misses the point. It is to show reversing precedent is not necessarily a bad thing, such as Brown v. Board.

See Cornyn's other tweets.

He effectively compared taking away women's rights to taking away racists' rights.

And you don't think that's a bad thing?
 
Back
Top