Ex-Watergate Prosecutor Says Georgia Probe Is The One That Could 'Send Trump To Jail'

Agree to disagree on that one. twump thought he was going to be reelected so none of his evil would ever blow back on him.

He's wrong.

His defeat showed him most Americans are not supporters. I'm not questioning what he thought he could do, only whether his actions can be proven to meet all the elements of any criminal law.

He prepared for his losses by claiming if he lost it would be stolen--the 2016 nomination, the 2016 and 2020 elections.
 
Nor did he suggest doing it illegally. I'm sure he didn't care, but that is not proof in a criminal case. For four years the left claimed he was going to jail for that week's. "He is through now".....etc. Mueller, business dealings, IRS, Ukraine, collusion, emoluments, 1st and 2nd impeachment.

We have to beat Trump politically. He is not going to jail.

You are a Trump supporter. Stop lying.
 
His defeat showed him most Americans are not supporters. I'm not questioning what he thought he could do, only whether his actions can be proven to meet all the elements of any criminal law.

He prepared for his losses by claiming if he lost it would be stolen--the 2016 nomination, the 2016 and 2020 elections.

But it's been proven he knew the 2020 election was legit. In spite of that he conducted a coup attempt. That cannot go unpunished.
 
But it's been proven he knew the 2020 election was legit. In spite of that he conducted a coup attempt. That cannot go unpunished.

I don't disagree, I just have serious doubts it will happen. What is the specific law he could be prosecuted for and how did his actions meet all the elements of the law.
 
I don't disagree, I just have serious doubts it will happen. What is the specific law he could be prosecuted for and how did his actions meet all the elements of the law.

Attempted murder, wire fraud, whatever law he broke by bilking millions from supporters. Those are a few.
 
You can't prosecute somebody with those accusations. What attempted murder?

You can, actually.

Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Shumer - they were all targeted. By twump. When the rioters were in the building, twump actually tweeted his supporters to go after Pence.
 
You are a simplistic idiot with no sense of rational thought or judgment.

Trump supporters don't deny their support--they are proud of it.

Your Trumpian side is showing.

FWIW, the best solution for all Americans is for the militias to handle Trump. :rofl2:

6j6nfp.jpg
 
Your Trumpian side is showing.

FWIW, the best solution for all Americans is for the militias to handle Trump. :rofl2:

You don't think the Trump supporters are willing to enthusiastically demonstrate their support?

If so, I was just stating an obvious fact, not showing my "Trumpian side."

I challenge you to show one post in which I supported or defended Trump. You are making false assumptions based on knee jerk reactions.

Spend a little time studying laws and court decisions about inciting riots, etc. and you will see those are very hard to prosecute and convict. Recognizing that difficulty is not the same thing as defending Trump although many of the Democrats make that false conclusion.
 
You don't think the Trump supporters are willing to enthusiastically demonstrate their support?

If so, I was just stating an obvious fact, not showing my "Trumpian side."

I challenge you to show one post in which I supported or defended Trump. You are making false assumptions based on knee jerk reactions.

Spend a little time studying laws and court decisions about inciting riots, etc. and you will see those are very hard to prosecute and convict. Recognizing that difficulty is not the same thing as defending Trump although many of the Democrats make that false conclusion.

It is obvious Trump organized the coup.
 
You don't think the Trump supporters are willing to enthusiastically demonstrate their support?

If so, I was just stating an obvious fact, not showing my "Trumpian side."

I challenge you to show one post in which I supported or defended Trump. You are making false assumptions based on knee jerk reactions.

Spend a little time studying laws and court decisions about inciting riots, etc. and you will see those are very hard to prosecute and convict. Recognizing that difficulty is not the same thing as defending Trump although many of the Democrats make that false conclusion.
Meh. It's on record I'm not a fucking lawyer. Yes, I do understand some charges are difficult to prove. Yes, I think the nutjobs supporting Trump do "enthusiastically" support him to the point of criminality.

I've noticed a trend of you favoring Trump when pressed on various topics. Not just pointing out the law, but favoring. It's a free country...and I'd like to keep it that way.

Do you think the militias are going to take a run at TrumpCo?
 
Meh. It's on record I'm not a fucking lawyer. Yes, I do understand some charges are difficult to prove. Yes, I think the nutjobs supporting Trump do "enthusiastically" support him to the point of criminality.

I've noticed a trend of you favoring Trump when pressed on various topics. Not just pointing out the law, but favoring. It's a free country...and I'd like to keep it that way.

Do you think the militias are going to take a run at TrumpCo?

No trend. I never favored Trump on anything just because I disagreed with those who think he can be convicted because they want him convicted. That is a trend toward understanding the law as it has been interpreted, not Trump.

Siding with facts that are not favorable to your views is not the same as supporting that side. The JPP conservatives call me a left-winger and libtard when I disagree with some of their views. The left and right lose their objective view of the facts because their partisan optimism distorts their judgment.
 
Back
Top