18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

[Jarod]

so he claimed it then, rather than testified about it......you should have been more clear......I think you know that his opinion is not evidence.....why do you waste our time......

Pence’s chief testified

 

[Jarod]

you know that isn't all that must be proved........stop lying.....

That’s it, what else? Did you read the statute?

 

[Jarod]

no, cuntselor.....your opinion does not outweigh that of the courts.....it is not a lie......the NYT, NPR and CNN said it......the fact you are afraid to use the same words the court did does not change anything.......

Untrue, you keep lying.

 

[Jarod]

not hearing something isn't evidence......did he give testimony of anything besides his suspicions?......no......otherwise you would be pasting it all over the board.......

He gave testimony about facts, who was in what room, what was said, who said it, what was done and who did it. You should have watched!

You wouldn’t be so clueless.

 

[Jarod]

Where in the law does it say that?

And how the 'f' would you prove it?

Answer - you could not.

You cannot throw people in jail, just because some judge decides - arbitrarily - that someone 'should have known' that what they were doing could lead someone else to break the law.
That would mean judges could throw ANYONE in jail they wanted - virtually.

It happens all the time. You can’t get away with murder because you didn’t know the bullet would kill the person you shot.

 

[Jarod]

bad news, cuntselor, but an actual conspiracy is in fact required for the crime of conspiracy....

I agree. Planning with someone to commit a crime, then one of the planners taking an overt act towards the plan is conspiracy.

 

[BidenPresident]

I agree. Planning with someone to commit a crime, then one of the planners taking an overt act towards the plan is conspiracy.

Trump, Meadows, and Eastman planning a coup. Trump was looking at weak spot--intimidate VP Pence.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

That’s it, what else? Did you read the statute?

if you quoted it accurately in the OP yes......should I double check to make sure you didn't change any words?.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Untrue, you keep lying.

its there for everyone to read, cuntselor......if you could read you would know that.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

He gave testimony about facts, who was in what room, what was said, who said it, what was done and who did it. You should have watched!

You wouldn’t be so clueless.

we both know if he actually had you would have linked it seven times already........stop pretending........or better yet, link it, cuntselor........

 

[Jarod]

its there for everyone to read, cuntselor......if you could read you would know that.......

I encourage them to all listen and see for themselves that you are lying. They should read the cases.

 

[Jarod]

we both know if he actually had you would have linked it seven times already........stop pretending........or better yet, link it, cuntselor........

I watched the hearing, I’m sure you can still hear it, it’s gotta be on YouTube.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I agree. Planning with someone to commit a crime, then one of the planners taking an overt act towards the plan is conspiracy.

words, cuntelor.......link someone's besides your own......we both know you can't testify without perjuring yourself......

 

[Jarod]

words, cuntelor.......link someone's besides your own......we both know you can't testify without perjuring yourself......

1/6 hearing today.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I watched the hearing, I’m sure you can still hear it, it’s gotta be on YouTube.

if you think its there, post it......I'm not going to watch hours of nothing just to find what you fantasized was evidence.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

1/6 hearing today.

nothing on the news about amazing revelations......apparently not even MSNBC heard what you think you did.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I encourage them to all listen and see for themselves that you are lying. They should read the cases.

so should you......unlike you, the courts used the word "unconstitutional".......

 

[Jarod]

if you think its there, post it......I'm not going to watch hours of nothing just to find what you fantasized was evidence.......

I believe you will never stop pretending you don’t see it.

 

[Jarod]

so should you......unlike you, the courts used the word "unconstitutional".......

They did not call the election unconstitutional and you know it!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

They did not call the election unconstitutional and you know it!

/shakes head.....you're a fucking idiot.....you know it, I know it, every single person who posts on JPP knows it.......

A state court in Pennsylvania on Friday struck down the state's landmark election law as unconstitutional

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/28/us/politics/pennsylvania-mail-voting-law-unconstitutional.html