Academic Suggests Pedophilia Be Taught in Schools as an Innate Sexuality

A professor of Ethics at Oslo Metropolitan University in Norway has called to legalize AI-generated child pornography, claiming that pedophilia should be seen as an innate sexuality that requires destigmatization.

Pedophilia is a sexual inclination that does exist in very real terms.
It's yet another birth defect to which humans are susceptible. As usual, we attribute blame and guilt to people who are actually genetically deficient.

Future generations will be able to do extensive testing in the early stages of pregnancy so that people who really shouldn't be born won't be.
You can be certain that backwards America, however, will be one of the last nations to do it.
 
There are hundreds of videos of Biden groping preteen girls.

There aren't any. However, there are videos of him having completely normal and appropriate actions with kids, which videos caused some pedophiles to get hard and then inadvertently to tell on themselves about that reaction. It's a bit like when a psychopath looks at a Rorschach test and describes the ink blots as involving all manner of horrific violence, fully convinced that's a reflection on whoever made those blots, rather than a revealing glimpse into his own diseased soul. So, you got off on that video, eh? Maybe better to keep it to yourself, sicko.
 
There aren't any. However, there are videos of him having completely normal and appropriate actions with kids, which videos caused some pedophiles to get hard and then inadvertently to tell on themselves about that reaction. It's a bit like when a psychopath looks at a Rorschach test and describes the ink blots as involving all manner of horrific violence, fully convinced that's a reflection on whoever made those blots, rather than a revealing glimpse into his own diseased soul. So, you got off on that video, eh? Maybe better to keep it to yourself, sicko.

You are more fucked in the head than I thought. And your eyesight sucks.
 
You are more fucked in the head than I thought. And your eyesight sucks.

Uh oh, were you another one of those perverts who accidentally told on himself, by sexualizing an innocent scene involving a child? It's amazing how many of you there are on the right!
 
Uh oh, were you another one of those perverts who accidentally told on himself, by sexualizing an innocent scene involving a child? It's amazing how many of you there are on the right!

You seemed to have been brought up in a childhood where inappropriate touching is accepted. I can see why you vote democrat.
 
There aren't any. However, there are videos of him having completely normal and appropriate actions with kids, which videos caused some pedophiles to get hard and then inadvertently to tell on themselves about that reaction. It's a bit like when a psychopath looks at a Rorschach test and describes the ink blots as involving all manner of horrific violence, fully convinced that's a reflection on whoever made those blots, rather than a revealing glimpse into his own diseased soul. So, you got off on that video, eh? Maybe better to keep it to yourself, sicko.

Ok if that isn't a 12b I am out of here.
 
Resting a hand on a person's shoulder or head, in the presence of other adults including the alleged victim's parents, is not "groping." If there are hundreds of videos purporting to show a criminal activity, why hasn't any law enforcement agency investigated? Let me guess. Derp State, right? lol

You look at what his moving not resting hands are doing
And the look on the little girl's faces (even their siblings are clearly concerned) nevermind the looks on the parents faces.
Look at a few clips before you tie yourself even tighter to his wagon.
 
Resting a hand on a person's shoulder or head, in the presence of other adults including the alleged victim's parents, is not "groping." If there are hundreds of videos purporting to show a criminal activity, why hasn't any law enforcement agency investigated? Let me guess. Derp State, right? lol

No not deep state. Just his personal power, which is what his act is really about.
 
There aren't any. However, there are videos of him having completely normal and appropriate actions with kids, which videos caused some pedophiles to get hard and then inadvertently to tell on themselves about that reaction. It's a bit like when a psychopath looks at a Rorschach test and describes the ink blots as involving all manner of horrific violence, fully convinced that's a reflection on whoever made those blots, rather than a revealing glimpse into his own diseased soul. So, you got off on that video, eh? Maybe better to keep it to yourself, sicko.

Uh oh, were you another one of those perverts who accidentally told on himself, by sexualizing an innocent scene involving a child? It's amazing how many of you there are on the right!

That's not even walking the line, you broke rule 12b. Consider this warning in this thread your one and only warning on this one.
 
Uh oh, were you another one of those perverts who accidentally told on himself, by sexualizing an innocent scene involving a child? It's amazing how many of you there are on the right!

Quit it. You will be banned.
 
There are hundreds of videos of Biden groping preteen girls.
You ignore this and bring what about isms?
Address Biden's groping.

Joe Biden has been vetted. You see what YOU want to see. You don’t see reality. How hard do you suppose the Trump campaign tried for dirt on Biden and found none. How hard do you think Obamas team looked for anything that would blow back on Biden. Your armchair analysis is bullshit. Complete nonsense. And frankly very dark and disturbing.
 
Quit it. You will be banned.

No. Go ahead and ban me.

I came here because I liked the fact this place wasn't over-moderated like the last forum I was in. Right-wingers insult me and the rest of the liberals here relentlessly, in very personal terms, and I'm perfectly fine with that. I like the fact it doesn't get censored to protect people's sensitive feelings. We're all grownups and can defend ourselves without Big Brother limiting free speech. But, unfortunately, this seems to be yet another forum where what matters isn't the quality of one's arguments, but rather whether one sticks to a narrow set of speech codes.

No thanks.
 
I was banned 2 weeks for less.

Well, they have been banned permanently.

Anyway, we give warnings first,then ban. In this case this person noted that they refuse to follow the rules they agreed to follow and asked for a permanent ban. I obliged.
 
Well, they have been banned permanently.

Anyway, we give warnings first,then ban. In this case this person noted that they refuse to follow the rules they agreed to follow and asked for a permanent ban. I obliged.

I received no warning. 2 weeks for first (controversial) offense. No questions. No answers. Does that mean I have a week "in the bank"? It should...
 
Back
Top