Fox Will Not Cover 1-6 Hearings Live

[Dutch Uncle]

Hello Dutch,

Democrats have taken more action to resolve gun violence than Republicans.

Agreed. Democrats are focused on stripping Americans of gun rights while Republicans were focused upon stripping Americans of abortion rights.

Now you might see why 40% of American voters are Independents: they don't like either party.

“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost”
- John Quincy Adams

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Lurch,

Careful, bud. Polltaker might call you, "small minded". He's very sensitive!

It was intended to be an inspirational post. It is a paraphrasing of a quote from Eleanor Roosevelt.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Dutch,

Agreed. Democrats are focused on stripping Americans of gun rights while Republicans were focused upon stripping Americans of abortion rights.

Now you might see why 40% of American voters are Independents: they don't like either party.

If that 40% could agree on a platform they could be the most powerful political party.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hello Dutch,



I would totally not be surprised if Jordan did.

Me neither. Same for Devin Nunes, Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor-Greene.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hello Dutch,

If that 40% could agree on a platform they could be the most powerful political party.

Or if the parties could regain their sanity they might grow larger than 30%.

 

[Sawyerloggingon]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,



It is not possible to show thousands of hours of video in one evening. The House Select Committee did a good job of selecting clips that reinforced the conclusion that DT incited the insurrection as part of his illegal attempts to overturn the free and fair election.

They cherry picked to produce their docudrama

 

[Sawyerloggingon]

Yes, that is her solution.

They have been trying to do so for decades.

They rarely if ever admit their ultimate goal is to make guns illegal but sometimes they inadvertently let the truth slip out.

 

[Sawyerloggingon]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,



I support responsible gun ownership.

Yet in your previous post you blamed gun violence in Chicago on availability of guns in neighboring red states.

 

[Sawyerloggingon]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,



The loopholes need to be closed. Gun shows, private sales and bequeathments need to be subject to complete background checks including examining social media posts. And there needs to be psyche tests to determine the prospective gun owner is responsible and cares about protecting life.

How about opening up juvenile criminal records as part of a background check? Why are libs against that?

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,

They cherry picked to produce their docudrama

They were documenting actual events. One day a singular version of the events will be commonly understood. It will not be the version DT wants.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,

Yet in your previous post you blamed gun violence in Chicago on availability of guns in neighboring red states.

Better to go with what is actually said than to try to read things into it.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,

How about opening up juvenile criminal records as part of a background check? Why are libs against that?

Has merit. What about looking at social media posts and requiring a psyche test?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,



Has merit. What about looking at social media posts and requiring a psyche test?

I'm good with that including applying it to all rights; mainly voting and running for elected national office.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Dutch Uncle,

I'm good with that including applying it to all rights; mainly voting and running for elected national office.

Might as well toss in driving, too.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hello Dutch Uncle,

Might as well toss in driving, too.

..and drinking.

Meanwhile, the Tweet that kicked off 1/6:

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Dutch,

..and drinking.

Meanwhile, the Tweet that kicked off 1/6:

It was mass deception. There was no evidence sufficient to overturn the election. And it was totally possible for Trump to have lost - because he did!

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hello Dutch,



It was mass deception. There was no evidence sufficient to overturn the election. And it was totally possible for Trump to have lost - because he did!

I rewatched the 1st Hearing today. Liz Cheney continues to impress me. She clearly stated they'd be proving every claim over the next hearings. It'll be epic to see.

On second review it I caught she said "multiple Republicans" asked Trump for a pardon after 1/6. The implies 3 or more. One was Sean Scott. Who were the others?

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Dutch,

I rewatched the 1st Hearing today. Liz Cheney continues to impress me. She clearly stated they'd be proving every claim over the next hearings. It'll be epic to see.

On second review it I caught she said "multiple Republicans" asked Trump for a pardon after 1/6. The implies 3 or more. One was Sean Scott. Who were the others?

Shortly after she began speaking, my immediate impression was: "She is nailing him to the WALL!"

At the end I was left with just three words.

"He did it."

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hello Dutch,



Shortly after she began speaking, my immediate impression was: "She is nailing him to the WALL!"

At the end I was left with just three words.

"He did it."

Agreed 100%. This was all Trump.

Most interesting to me was seeing both Ivanka back Barr and also Trump's reaction to her comments. Trump is clearly delusional and, IMO, there's no doubt he planned to overthrow the nation in a coup.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Dutch,

Agreed 100%. This was all Trump.

Most interesting to me was seeing both Ivanka back Barr and also Trump's reaction to her comments. Trump is clearly delusional and, IMO, there's no doubt he planned to overthrow the nation in a coup.

Not really a big surprise. Trump never had any respect for the rule of law in the first place. He doesn't understand duty, responsibility nor patriotism. He doesn't get it why soldiers would die for their country. "I don't get it. What's in it for them?" He has no respect for the Constitution. Why would he honor centuries-old legally-implied, but not enforced/commanded, tradition?