The nation’s “best Governor”

"Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards." As for "discussion", if a child...or children... or parents... have an issue to discuss with the teacher...or counselor...or nurse...or administrator, there's nothing in the bill would prevent that...
Teachers are there to teach...Kids are there to learn... As for "instruction"? It's easy to look up the curriculum for elementary classes....language arts, math, natural and social sciences, fine arts and crafts, music, phys ed... You know...basics for success in the first stages of their formal education...That's a full day for the younger ones, don't you think?
Bingo. But it's easier to lie to the dumbest who walk among us.

I see your psycho can't quit you. How many years has the obsession been on? At least 11 for certain, so 15 to 20 maybe? Good God.
 
I see the

6CwO9UQ.jpg


went out and was received. :laugh:
 
Life is Golden. I put you in ignore for a reason. I'll never read your evil moonbat horseshit again.

Seriously. Fuck off.
 
Hey, just because you're a self-hating closet lesbian is no reason to lash out at others. Johnny just wants to know why Bobby has to mommies. What the fuck is wrong with you you fucking homophobic, ass-pounder?

Fuck off.
While I doubt TOP is a lesbian, not that it matters, people who hate others like you two usually have some self-hating issues. A common reason to hate others is to turn self-hate into a weapon to use upon others.

How can she be an "ass-pounder" as a lesbian? That's more your department, isn't it, son?
 
While I doubt TOP is a lesbian, not that it matters, people who hate others like you two usually have some self-hating issues. A common reason to hate others is to turn self-hate into a weapon to use upon others.

How can she be an "ass-pounder" as a lesbian? That's more your department, isn't it, son?

Oh, that's such sage advice dutch. Thanks so much.

New subject: Why are you such a sorry douche-nozzel?
 
Oh, that's such sage advice dutch. Thanks so much.

New subject: Why are you such a sorry douche-nozzel?

You're welcome, son. I try my best to be a positive influence on people. Especially those so sorely in trouble like yourself. If that makes me look like a "douche-nozzle" to you, so be it.

You're an over-30 gay man in 21st century America and you still consider yourself less than equal to straight males your own age. That's fucked up, dude. Join a therapy group or something. :thup:
 
Lurch has self-esteem issues. Such resentment is commonly related to parents disowning or otherwise denigrating them. It would explain the chip on his shoulder.
Being such a broken, hate-filled person could be the result of numerous things, nothing we can pinpoint. I do think parents have a significant impact on children. The cliche chip off the old block is most times true. I do think we turn into our parents.
 
While I doubt TOP is a lesbian, not that it matters, people who hate others like you two usually have some self-hating issues. A common reason to hate others is to turn self-hate into a weapon to use upon others.

How can she be an "ass-pounder" as a lesbian? That's more your department, isn't it, son?
I don't perceive TOP as hating others. Why do you? Nothing she writes indicates hatred and that's what my opinion is based on.
 
You're welcome, son. I try my best to be a positive influence on people. Especially those so sorely in trouble like yourself. If that makes me look like a "douche-nozzle" to you, so be it.

You're an over-30 gay man in 21st century America and you still consider yourself less than equal to straight males your own age. That's fucked up, dude. Join a therapy group or something. :thup:

Mmm. Yes. You're such the model of tolerance and kumbah-yah. At times I feel, when I'm chatting with you here I'm actually speaking with Ghandi!

Dutch. You have this perception of yourself. It's not bad!

It's just wrong.

Fuck off, bitch.
 
Being such a broken, hate-filled person could be the result of numerous things, nothing we can pinpoint. I do think parents have a significant impact on children. The cliche chip off the old block is most times true. I do think we turn into our parents.

Agreed it could be numerous things, but the way a person conducts themselves and talks about themselves or others quickly narrows down the variables. Therefore, I believe it's possible to narrow down causal factors and, with enough data, pinpoint the main causal factors. <--yes, there could be a few different things at the base, not just one.


Agreed on parents. Parents teach everything including negative things. A neglectful parent is teaching as much as a nurturing parent; it's just that the results are different.

Agreed to "a chip off the old block". Besides genetic differences, nurturing differences come into play among siblings. If a family had what used to be the "ideal familly"; a boy, girl, boy all about 2-3 years apart, then who would most likely be the "chip off the old block"? The oldest male.

Even if a gay oldest male son came out against an Archie Bunker-type father, the son would gravitate to acting like a gay version of his old man. People change, but only if they want to change. It's up to them. IMO, most people mean good but not all have the will to push forward and continually improve themselves to a happier, more self-actualized whole. They seem to tire out and give up.
 
I don't perceive TOP as hating others. Why do you? Nothing she writes indicates hatred and that's what my opinion is based on.

A point we can agree to disagree upon. You are basing your view on her words. Since she never calls TOW a cunt and only "thanks" people who do, then you consider her heart to be pure. I do not because passive-aggressiveness is a form of abuse. Ergo, your friend is abusive which also makes her hateful if she targets specific people like TOW or me.

Hopefully you'll see that I try to stay out of it since, IMHO, taking advantage of mentally ill people is also a form of abuse.

Let me be clear:
I believe TOP is a fragile old woman living a fantasy life online and doesn't have a firm grip on reality regarding the consequences of her actions.


https://www.verywellmind.com/subtle-bullies-coping-with-passive-aggressive-people-4018517
How to Deal With Someone Who Is Passive- Aggressive
Interacting with someone who has passive-aggressive behaviors, also sometimes referred to as a "passive-aggressive bully," can be complicated. Oftentimes, their actions are a way of coping with anger that they don't feel comfortable openly expressing....

...You do not have to appease someone who is passive-aggressive. Stick to what you know is right regardless of any emotional abuse they may inflict.
 
Agreed it could be numerous things, but the way a person conducts themselves and talks about themselves or others quickly narrows down the variables. Therefore, I believe it's possible to narrow down causal factors and, with enough data, pinpoint the main causal factors. <--yes, there could be a few different things at the base, not just one.

Agreed on parents. Parents teach everything including negative things. A neglectful parent is teaching as much as a nurturing parent; it's just that the results are different.

Agreed to "a chip off the old block". Besides genetic differences, nurturing differences come into play among siblings. If a family had what used to be the "ideal familly"; a boy, girl, boy all about 2-3 years apart, then who would most likely be the "chip off the old block"? The oldest male.

Even if a gay oldest male son came out against an Archie Bunker-type father, the son would gravitate to acting like a gay version of his old man. People change, but only if they want to change. It's up to them. IMO, most people mean good but not all have the will to push forward and continually improve themselves to a happier, more self-actualized whole. They seem to tire out and give up.
A board certified Psychiatrist cannot diagnose a patient without examining them.

You or I certainly cannot. All I can do is observe the current state of mind based on writing and assume, but I do not have a clue how someone got that way. Just glad it wasn't me.

IMO, long term behavioral outcomes are based on nurture but I think there is also a genetic factor somewhere in there. You see it in nature, I think it holds true for humans.
 
You are basing your view on her words.
Um, why yes. I don't base my conclusions on what someone else "tells" me. And it would serve you well to do the same. I don't know her, have never spoken with her or been in her presence. Therefore my judgment is based solely on the words she puts on an electronic screen. I do know she has never demonstrated hatred verbally or given me another poster's name. Ever.

Since she never calls TOW a cunt and only "thanks" people who do, then you consider her heart to be pure. I do not because passive-aggressiveness is a form of abuse. Ergo, your friend is abusive which also makes her hateful if she targets specific people like TOW or me.
That's your opinion and one I don't share. Based on my limited ability to "read" someone I have never met, I do not sense anger or hatred. Never have. A thanked post does not indicate anger or hate, just agreement or a shared disgust. Big difference. That said, after what has been done to her by the Doxxing Cunt and Co., no one would be more justified to be angry. But she doesn't appear to be.

This is a political message board. A rough and tumble arena. If one perceives a "thanked" post or a benign comment in another thread as an "attack", then honey they are in the wronnng place. That is nothing.

Those so thin skinned belong on a gardening or travel discussion board. Not here.


Let me be clear:
I believe TOP is a fragile old woman living a fantasy life online and doesn't have a firm grip on reality regarding the consequences of her actions.
Based on what, specifically? What has she written to indicate such as that? Support your outlandish claim for once with something of substance.

I think you forgot to add - "because a DC told me that is what she is."

Neither you nor I know anything about people we never met or laid eyes on. The difference between me and you is draw my own conclusions. I will not jump on a bandwagon because a deranged bully wants me to.
 
A board certified Psychiatrist cannot diagnose a patient without examining them.

You or I certainly cannot. All I can do is observe the current state of mind based on writing and assume, but I do not have a clue how someone got that way. Just glad it wasn't me.

IMO, long term behavioral outcomes are based on nurture but I think there is also a genetic factor somewhere in there. You see it in nature, I think it holds true for humans.

Correct. I'm talking about screening people. Even a computer can do that. It's not rocket science. I'm not referencing treatment, just assessments.

Yes you and I can. It's a simple matter of a little training. Consider the training customs officers get when assessing people. They look for indications people are being deceptive or unduly nervous. It's not rocket science, just some basic human observation skills. My lifetime career involved a lot of assessment of personnel. I don't need to know the reason a person is too physically or psychologically unfit to fly. I just need to know that they are. A 40 year career of that plus a Psych BA allowed me to explore the deeper issues involved in such problems.

I'm not a Freudian touchy-feely guy. B. F. Skinner is my hero, but I do understand the perspective and legitimacy of psycho-analytic, humanistic and behavioral psychology.



Example of screening tests: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/tests/health/mental-health-assessment
Mental Health Assessment
Depression
What Type of Smart Are You?
Extroversion
Attention Span Test
Type-A Personality
Memory Test
Anger Management Test
Assertiveness
Perfectionism Test
 
Um, why yes. I don't base my conclusions on what someone else "tells" me....

...That's your opinion and one I don't share. Based on my limited ability to "read" someone I have never met, I do not sense anger or hatred. Never have. A thanked post does not indicate anger or hate, just agreement or a shared disgust. Big difference. That said, after what has been done to her by the Doxxing Cunt and Co., no one would be more justified to be angry. But she doesn't appear to be.

This is a political message board. A rough and tumble arena. If one perceives a "thanked" post or a benign comment in another thread as an "attack", then honey they are in the wronnng place. That is nothing.

Those so thin skinned belong on a gardening or travel discussion board. Not here.


Based on what, specifically? What has she written to indicate such as that? Support your outlandish claim for once with something of substance.

I think you forgot to add - "because a DC told me that is what she is."

Neither you nor I know anything about people we never met or laid eyes on. The difference between me and you is draw my own conclusions. I will not jump on a bandwagon because a deranged bully wants me to.

Me neither. It's one thing to hear one side of a story. It's another to verify it or at least assess the personalities involved. Ask oneself "Which person, if either, is trustworthy?"

You talk about rough and tumble then chastise others for being rough and tumble. Do you see what's wrong with that picture, Lig?

The only woman in my life who can even come close to telling me what to do is my wife. :)

Disagreed that personalities can't be assessed online.
 
Me neither. It's one thing to hear one side of a story. It's another to verify it or at least assess the personalities involved. Ask oneself "Which person, if either, is trustworthy?"

You talk about rough and tumble then chastise others for being rough and tumble. Do you see what's wrong with that picture, Lig?

The only woman in my life who can even come close to telling me what to do is my wife. :)

Disagreed that personalities can't be assessed online.
Where have I 'chastised' someone? I know what these boards are about, and arguments, etc. are the norm. I've had knock down drag outs with the best of them.

What is not the norm is doxxing someone to hell and back and obsessing over them for well over a decade.

Again, what do you base your claims about Top on if it isn't what someone else told you? You didn't answer what you base your statements on. The one who fed you all this garbage is anything but trustworthy. I pegged that from the jump, it was always my gut feeling and I stayed with it. My suspicions proved to be spot on.
 
Back
Top