Canada bans handguns

For all the focus, in the US, on assault weapons, thanks to the sheer drama of a handful of mass killing by gun fetishists toting AR-15s, the truth is the large majority of deaths involving firearms are by handguns. Handguns are more likely to be carried around, which makes them more likely to be readily at hand to turn a non-deadly circumstance into a deadly one. And, of course, they're far more convenient for a lot of crimes, so they're more likely to turn crimes deadly, as well. So, while gun controllers tend to focus on assault weapons as the "low hanging fruit," the impact of such a law is likely to be small -- barely statistically noticeable at the level of overall mortality stats. Handguns, on the other hand, can have a real impact. Gun control methods that make it harder to get your hands on handguns will save a lot of lives.

Unconstitutional.
 
Canada flat out says you do not have a right to guns for self defense. so you are just a liar that actually does agree with gun grabs.

don't ever say you are not

Canada has no RIGHT of gun ownership, period.

Bill Blair, minister of emergency preparedness, said Canada is very different from the United States.

"In Canada, gun ownership is a privilege not a right," Blair said. "This is a principal that differentiates ourselves from many other countries in the world, notably our colleagues and friends to the south. In Canada, guns are only intended to be used for hunting and sport purposes."

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/30/1102084025/canada-bill-freeze-handgun-sales-imports
 
Canada has no RIGHT of gun ownership, period.

Bill Blair, minister of emergency preparedness, said Canada is very different from the United States.

"In Canada, gun ownership is a privilege not a right," Blair said. "This is a principal that differentiates ourselves from many other countries in the world, notably our colleagues and friends to the south. In Canada, guns are only intended to be used for hunting and sport purposes."

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/30/1102084025/canada-bill-freeze-handgun-sales-imports
and the sun sets in the west.

no shit. as I said, cheering this on is something only gun grabbers do
 
King Trudeau has announced that handguns can no longer be purchased, sold, transferred, or imported and that any handgun can be seized at government whim.

Trudeau has decided to try to join the ranks of Venezuela, the USSR, China, and Cuba.


Now watch the gangs in the streets shooting each other and taking God knows how many innocents with them in claiming their share of the Black Market.

Can the citizens of Canada regain control without war and bloodshed now? I doubt it.

Well, he was conceived in Cuba.
 
I believe it is more than just handguns, a temporary ban, and it is expected to be approved legislatively

There is a reason Canada’s gun violence and gun homicide rates are way below those of the United States, called sensible gun control

And you don't even have to travel very far to live there.
 
Canada has no RIGHT of gun ownership, period.

Bill Blair, minister of emergency preparedness, said Canada is very different from the United States.

"In Canada, gun ownership is a privilege not a right," Blair said. "This is a principal that differentiates ourselves from many other countries in the world, notably our colleagues and friends to the south. In Canada, guns are only intended to be used for hunting and sport purposes."

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/30/1102084025/canada-bill-freeze-handgun-sales-imports

The right of self defense is inherent. NO government, no matter how oppressive, can change that.
It's sad to see the great nation of Canada fall into dictatorship like this.
 
Unconstitutional.

The current high-court goon squad would probably agree, but that can be changed. For well over 200 years after the Constitution was ratified, it was understood that states could regulate guns however they wanted. A few extra Supreme Court justices (or some well-timed deaths for some of the current goons) is all it would take to return us to that original intent.
 
The current high-court goon squad would probably agree, but that can be changed.
They haven't agreed yet. Irrelevant.
For well over 200 years after the Constitution was ratified, it was understood that states could regulate guns however they wanted.
Discard of the Constitution of the United States. Attempt to change history.
A few extra Supreme Court justices (or some well-timed deaths for some of the current goons) is all it would take to return us to that original intent.
You don't get to speak for the dead. The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution.

You can't hide behind the Constitution you despise.
 
King Trudeau has announced that handguns can no longer be purchased, sold, transferred, or imported and that any handgun can be seized at government whim.

Trudeau has decided to try to join the ranks of Venezuela, the USSR, China, and Cuba.


Now watch the gangs in the streets shooting each other and taking God knows how many innocents with them in claiming their share of the Black Market.

Can the citizens of Canada regain control without war and bloodshed now? I doubt it.

Canadians don't have a gun fetish nor a gun culture, thinking that Canadians will now be the wild west where everyone's life is in danger is some ignorant bull shit , Canada thankfully doesn't have redneck poorly educated Providences


The following nine (9) types of firearms and their variants have already been prohibited in Canada:
M16, AR-10, AR-15 rifles and M4 carbine.
Ruger Mini-14 rifle.
M14 rifle.
Vz58 rifle.
Robinson Armament XCR rifle.
CZ Scorpion EVO 3 carbine and pistol.
Beretta CX4 Storm carbine.
SIG Sauer SIG MCX and SIG Sauer SIG MPX carbine and pistol.
 
Canadians don't have a gun fetish nor a gun culture, thinking that Canadians will now be the wild west where everyone's life is in danger is some ignorant bull shit , Canada thankfully doesn't have redneck poorly educated Providences


The following nine (9) types of firearms and their variants have already been prohibited in Canada:
M16, AR-10, AR-15 rifles and M4 carbine.
Ruger Mini-14 rifle.
M14 rifle.
Vz58 rifle.
Robinson Armament XCR rifle.
CZ Scorpion EVO 3 carbine and pistol.
Beretta CX4 Storm carbine.
SIG Sauer SIG MCX and SIG Sauer SIG MPX carbine and pistol.

Sybil is a wackadoodle. All the proof is in his signature and the signatures of his socks IBDaMann and gfm7175.
 
The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution
Unfortunately, the Republican operatives on the high court have long implicitly disagreed.

For example, in the infamous Bush v. Gore case, they ignored the fact that the Constitution had left the power exclusively to the states to decide how they would handle elections, and they invented a radical new reading of the Equal Protection clause (an expressly single-use reading other courts were warned away from ever treating as an actual principle) that allowed the federal judiciary to invalidate the way a state was running an election recount.

With those Republican operatives in robes, it's never about principles of law. It's just about what argument is convenient, at the moment, to enact the political goal they're pursuing.
 
Canadians don't have a gun fetish nor a gun culture, thinking that Canadians will now be the wild west where everyone's life is in danger is some ignorant bull shit , Canada thankfully doesn't have redneck poorly educated Providences
Is that why gun shops are packed by Canadians buying every pistol in the place? Right after this announcement?
The following nine (9) types of firearms and their variants have already been prohibited in Canada:
M16, AR-10, AR-15 rifles and M4 carbine.
Ruger Mini-14 rifle.
M14 rifle.
Vz58 rifle.
Robinson Armament XCR rifle.
CZ Scorpion EVO 3 carbine and pistol.
Beretta CX4 Storm carbine.
SIG Sauer SIG MCX and SIG Sauer SIG MPX carbine and pistol.

Irrelevant.
 
Unfortunately, the Republican operatives on the high court have long implicitly disagreed.
Irrelevant.
For example, in the infamous Bush v. Gore case, they ignored the fact that the Constitution had left the power exclusively to the states to decide how they would handle elections,
No, they didn't.
and they invented a radical new reading of the Equal Protection clause (an expressly single-use reading other courts were warned away from ever treating as an actual principle) that allowed the federal judiciary to invalidate the way a state was running an election recount.
No, they didn't. Florida simply chose it's electors, since the election faulted.
With those Republican operatives in robes, it's never about principles of law. It's just about what argument is convenient, at the moment, to enact the political goal they're pursuing.
You are describing Democrats. Inversion fallacy.
 
Irrelevant.

No, they didn't.

No, they didn't. Florida simply chose it's electors, since the election faulted.

You are describing Democrats. Inversion fallacy.
Bulverism

Yes they did. Mantra 251-D

Yes they did. Mantra 251-D and 267.

She's describing both since both are authoritarian assholes supported by psychos like you. RQAA
 
Back
Top