Pelosi doesnt want you to know killing Russian military leaders and sinking Moskva

[anatta]

flashed annoyance at reports this week claiming the United States provided intelligence to Ukrainian military forces to assist them in killing Russian military leaders and sinking the flagship Moskva in the Black Sea, both of which elicited denials from the Pentagon.

As a person involved in intelligence for more than 25 years in the Congress, the first person in the leadership to have a security credential, I am very concerned about newspapers reporting if I don't confirm or deny what that report is — but I don't think it's helpful to have that kind of reporting," Pelosi told Nicolle Wallace on MSNBC's Deadline: White House.

"I say that with all of the respect in the world, and I protected the rights of — of the press to be protected when they put information out there, that the burden of proof has to be on the government to prove them harmful in any event," she added. "But I don't think it's helpful to say — whether it's true or not, I can't confirm. But what I do know, it's not helpful."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/pelosi-slams-media-for-reports-on-us-intelligence

 

[anatta]

put on your Uk flag pins and your blue and yellow Twitter logos and STFU

It's only a US war against Russia -none of your damn business

 

[Cypress]

Of course we have been providing since February 24 Intel to a European nation which has been defending itself against an invader bent on conquest.

Is there a sentient person who was not aware of it?


But the USA government is not going to confirm or deny Intel methods and sources for the Kremlin to read about in the media.

 

[Cypress]

put on your Uk flag pins and your blue and yellow Twitter logos and STFU

It's only a US war against Russia -none of your damn business

It literally seems like you were hoping and praying that Ukraine would be totally outgunned, easily defeated, and subjugated to the Kremlin's will.

 

[anatta]

Of course we have been providing since February 24 Intel to a European nation which has been defending itself against an invader.

Is there a sentient person who was not aware of it?


But the USA government is not going to confirm or deny Intel methods and sources for the Kremlin to read about in the media.

why does the Kremlin need to read it in the media?
Pelosi doesnt say anything about "sources and methods" we all know the basics of using our sophisticated drones and spy satellites to target Russians

she's only concerned about you finding out we are the one's doing the warring against Russia

am very concerned about newspapers reporting if I don't confirm or deny what that report is — but I don't think it's helpful to have that kind of reporting,"

 

[anatta]

It literally seems like you were hoping and praying that Ukraine would be totally outgunned, easily defeated, and subjugated to the Kremlin's will.

I am not answering your stupid ad homs. I make my points clearly
I am against the USA prosecuting this war against Russia..focus and quit playing the moral card

 

[BartenderElite]

I am not answering your stupid ad homs. I make my points clearly
I am against the USA prosecuting this war against Russia..focus and quit playing the moral card

Having morality is a "moral card" now?

 

[Matt Dillon]

Having morality is a "moral card" now?

What exactly do you base morality on?

 

[ExpressLane]

flashed annoyance at reports this week claiming the United States provided intelligence to Ukrainian military forces to assist them in killing Russian military leaders and sinking the flagship Moskva in the Black Sea, both of which elicited denials from the Pentagon.

As a person involved in intelligence for more than 25 years in the Congress, the first person in the leadership to have a security credential, I am very concerned about newspapers reporting if I don't confirm or deny what that report is — but I don't think it's helpful to have that kind of reporting," Pelosi told Nicolle Wallace on MSNBC's Deadline: White House.

"I say that with all of the respect in the world, and I protected the rights of — of the press to be protected when they put information out there, that the burden of proof has to be on the government to prove them harmful in any event," she added. "But I don't think it's helpful to say — whether it's true or not, I can't confirm. But what I do know, it's not helpful."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/pelosi-slams-media-for-reports-on-us-intelligence

How the Soviets fought against the Americans in Vietnam (PHOTOS)https://www.rbth.com/history/332396-how-soviets-fought-against-americans

 

[Cypress]

I am not answering your stupid ad homs. I make my points clearly
I am against the USA prosecuting this war against Russia..focus and quit playing the moral card

USA and Ukraine did not start this war.

Russia is the invader.

There is not a single American or Ukrainian soldier on Russian territory, and not a single Russian city has been shelled to a smouldering pile of ash.

 

[BartenderElite]

What exactly do you base morality on?

Would you agree that the willful massacre of a country's civilians is "immoral?"

I think there are some things we all know when we see 'em.

 

[ExpressLane]

What exactly do you base morality on?

Nothing.

 

[BartenderElite]

Nothing.

Again - try to be more clever.

 

[Cypress]

why does the Kremlin need to read it in the media?
Pelosi doesnt say anything about "sources and methods" we all know the basics of using our sophisticated drones and spy satellites to target Russians

she's only concerned about you finding out we are the one's doing the warring against Russia

The government rightly does not advertise tactical military Intel to any public media sources.

It is comic that you think this is somehow nefarious.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Would you agree that the willful massacre of a country's civilians is "immoral?"

I think there are some things we all know when we see 'em.

I would, but why did you just a question with a question? It appears much like you have something you're trying to hide.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Again - try to be more clever.

If the shoe fits...

Being "clever" and being right and moral are 2 entirely separate things.

God hates people being "clever". Did you know that?

You seem to think being "clever" is winning, whereas I think being "right" is winning.

 

[BartenderElite]

I would, but why did you just a question with a question? It appears much like you have something you're trying to hide.

It's a complex question. I had a good upbringing w/ parents who always did the right thing & spent their lives trying to help people.

I think most of my morality comes from them.

Adequate?

 

[BartenderElite]

If the shoe fits...

Being "clever" and being right and moral are 2 entirely separate things.

God hates people being "clever". Did you know that?

You seem to think being "clever" is winning; Whereas I think being "right" is winning.

God doesn't "hate." Did you know that?

 

[BartenderElite]

If the shoe fits...

Being "clever" and being right and moral are 2 entirely separate things.

God hates people being "clever". Did you know that?

You seem to think being "clever" is winning, whereas I think being "right" is winning.

Well, ExpressLane isn't "right" either. I'm a moral individual.

 

[Matt Dillon]

It's a complex question. I had a good upbringing w/ parents who always did the right thing & spent their lives trying to help people.

I think most of my morality comes from them.

Adequate?

No. What is your basis for morality? Is it objective or subjective?