It appears we have no right to privacy!

BartenderElite said:
Have you said anything against this freedom-restricting potential action from SCOTUS? It seems like you're just calling out libs for hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

i've said lots of things about lots of freedom restricting potentials from government...........all of you dictatorial loving fuckheads stated 'no right is absolute'...........
 
Jarod said:
None that I know about, but now they likely never will. If Alabama wants to ban gastro bypass, they can. If they want to ban heart bypass surgery they can... If they think artificial hearts go against Gods will, they can ban it.
Click to expand...

Well, they already could. Roe didn't protect those things under privacy rights. Privacy rights have only been used to protect contraception, abortion, homosexual acts, same sex marriage (also based on the equal protection clause), the right of parents to educate their children in private schools, living arrangements, and terminating prolonged life saving medical treatments.

Unless the courts have specifically ruled on the issue it is not constitutionally protected under the right to privacy.

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/rightofprivacy.html
 
Jarod said:
What parents were put on a terrorist watch list? NONE! (unless they were terrorists)
Click to expand...

yes they were.

A.G. Merrick Garland Tells FBI To Investigate Parents Who Yell at School Officials About Critical Race Theory
School boards want some perturbed parents branded domestic terrorists.
ROBBY SOAVE | 10.6.2021 10:18 AM

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
upiphotostwo820085
(Ken Cedeno/UPI/Newscom)
Taking note of a supposed "spike" in harassment and intimidating behavior directed at public school officials, Attorney General Merrick Garland has instructed the FBI to be on the lookout for angry parents demanding accountability at school board meetings.

On Monday, Garland sent a memo to the federal law enforcement agency directing it to coordinate with the nation's 14,000 school districts. This action comes after the Biden administration received a plea from the National School Boards Association (NSBA) to protect schools from the "imminent threat" of parents sending "threatening letters and cyberbullying" school officials. The association considers such activities to be akin to "domestic terrorism."

"As these acts of malice, violence, and threats against public school officials have increased, the classification of these heinous actions could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes," wrote the NSBA.

Has some great number of teachers, principals, and district leaders come under violent attack? Of course not. What both the Justice Department and the concerned school boards are really talking about it is the increased number of recent community meetings that have featured angry feedback from parents. These parents are sick of COVID-19 mitigation efforts that have relegated actual students to afterthought status within the education department: the farce of virtual learning, mandatory closure when asymptomatic cases are detected, ceaseless masking. Young people who have the least to fear from the pandemic—the severe disease and death rate for the under-18 crowd is extremely low—have been forced to make tremendous educational and social sacrifices to bend the curve of COVID-19. Families are fed up with a public education system that puts the needs of students last, and they are speaking up about it.

https://reason.com/2021/10/06/ag-me...e-theory-parents-schools-domestic-terrorists/

you people have gone batshit insane.
 
AssHatZombie said:
yes they were.

A.G. Merrick Garland Tells FBI To Investigate Parents Who Yell at School Officials About Critical Race Theory
School boards want some perturbed parents branded domestic terrorists.
ROBBY SOAVE | 10.6.2021 10:18 AM

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
upiphotostwo820085
(Ken Cedeno/UPI/Newscom)
Taking note of a supposed "spike" in harassment and intimidating behavior directed at public school officials, Attorney General Merrick Garland has instructed the FBI to be on the lookout for angry parents demanding accountability at school board meetings.

On Monday, Garland sent a memo to the federal law enforcement agency directing it to coordinate with the nation's 14,000 school districts. This action comes after the Biden administration received a plea from the National School Boards Association (NSBA) to protect schools from the "imminent threat" of parents sending "threatening letters and cyberbullying" school officials. The association considers such activities to be akin to "domestic terrorism."

"As these acts of malice, violence, and threats against public school officials have increased, the classification of these heinous actions could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes," wrote the NSBA.

Has some great number of teachers, principals, and district leaders come under violent attack? Of course not. What both the Justice Department and the concerned school boards are really talking about it is the increased number of recent community meetings that have featured angry feedback from parents. These parents are sick of COVID-19 mitigation efforts that have relegated actual students to afterthought status within the education department: the farce of virtual learning, mandatory closure when asymptomatic cases are detected, ceaseless masking. Young people who have the least to fear from the pandemic—the severe disease and death rate for the under-18 crowd is extremely low—have been forced to make tremendous educational and social sacrifices to bend the curve of COVID-19. Families are fed up with a public education system that puts the needs of students last, and they are speaking up about it.

https://reason.com/2021/10/06/ag-me...e-theory-parents-schools-domestic-terrorists/

you people have gone batshit insane.
Click to expand...


Reason.com - Lies

I could find websites that make up all kinds of crazy shit too.
 
We have a radical right-wing court now. America needs to be prepared to see that vision play out judicially.

It's a court that is completely out of step w/ mainstream America.
 
Jarod said:
Not everyone has the resources to leave the state for an abortion.

Miami is a long way from the Alabama state line. (Oops)
Click to expand...

A plane ticket is maybe $200, if that. Getting an abortion generally isn't free. So, someone has the resources to get one, they likely have the resources to travel where it can be done. In any case, there are already states where someone would have to travel hundreds of miles to find a provider as it is. This isn't an undue burden as it is in roughly 98% of cases an elective procedure, not a medically necessary one. That makes it little different from cosmetic surgery.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
A plane ticket is maybe $200, if that. Getting an abortion generally isn't free. So, someone has the resources to get one, they likely have the resources to travel where it can be done. In any case, there are already states where someone would have to travel hundreds of miles to find a provider as it is. This isn't an undue burden as it is in roughly 98% of cases an elective procedure, not a medically necessary one. That makes it little different from cosmetic surgery.
Click to expand...

This is incorrect. The impact this has on poor working women cannot be overstated. Many are not able to get time off from work to travel, and $200 is a budget breaker for many.

You're really oversimplifying what this means for millions.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
A plane ticket is maybe $200, if that. Getting an abortion generally isn't free. So, someone has the resources to get one, they likely have the resources to travel where it can be done. In any case, there are already states where someone would have to travel hundreds of miles to find a provider as it is. This isn't an undue burden as it is in roughly 98% of cases an elective procedure, not a medically necessary one. That makes it little different from cosmetic surgery.
Click to expand...

Planned Parenthood provides free abortions to those who cannot afford one.
 
dukkha said:
no the 14th carries equal protection across all state lines
Click to expand...

Again, a canard. If that were true, then again, the 2nd Amendment would apply equally to all states, but it doesn't. A abortion isn't portable. It occurs in a specific location. So one state could have lax abortion laws while another has a complete ban and it wouldn't change anything other than a person wanting an abortion having to travel some distance--which they would have to in any case--to get one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top