Justice Thomas’s wife is a political extremist. This is now a problem for the court.

It's not "saying" that's the problem, it's actively trying to overturn it that is.

A group of white supremacists drag out a black man to lynch him. The crowd says "hang him! Hang him!" and they do.

Should only the actual participants in the lynching be prosecuted or everyone who supported the lynching? I believe the latter.


Virginia Thomas is guilty of supporting the overthrow of the United States of America and our Constitution. Her best move is to commit herself to an insane asylum and plead she's being "deprogrammed" as a Q anon member and regrets her actions.

Clarence needs to reaffirm love for his "best friend" and recuse himself where appropriate along with an apology for not doing so previously.
 
Why is that a problem? President William Jefferson Clinton was married to a Sea Hag who had people murdered and that didn't seem to bother the bulk of the population. Don't let your panties bunch.

Hillary, the world's greatest serial killer, murdering in plain sight and getting away with it! I can't wait for all the true crime novels to come out!
 
A group of white supremacists drag out a black man to lynch him. The crowd says "hang him! Hang him!" and they do.

Should only the actual participants in the lynching be prosecuted or everyone who supported the lynching? I believe the latter.

Virginia Thomas is guilty of supporting the overthrow of the United States of America and our Constitution. Her best move is to commit herself to an insane asylum and plead she's being "deprogrammed" as a Q anon member and regrets her actions.

Clarence needs to reaffirm love for his "best friend" and recuse himself where appropriate along with an apology for not doing so previously.

^ I wish it were the latter but on legal grounds it's probably dicey.
 
I'm retired, dumbass. I'm also not the dumbass who bragged for months about supporting the white supremacist militias and overthrowing the nation then backed away and state you never did anything. LOL

I never said I supported them financially or any other way. That was all just more of your dreamed up straw man bullshit. You live in fantasy land most of the time,....early onset?
 
Why is that a problem? President William Jefferson Clinton was married to a Sea Hag who had people murdered and that didn't seem to bother the bulk of the population. Don't let your panties bunch.

^^^Proof you're a wackadoodle. ^^^
 
I never said I supported them financially or any other way. That was all just more of your dreamed up straw man bullshit. You live in fantasy land most of the time,....early onset?

Exactly. It's like saying "I love my country" but never even vote. You screamed for months about supporting the violence of the Insurrection, "top the steal", how Democrat Marxist have taken over the country, attacking police and backing the militias but when it came down to the nitty gritty, you got scared and confessed you didn't and don't do a damn thing.

I think it's fucking hilarious and even better than if you'd admitted to sending them some money. It's so you. LOL

time until a MAGA emoji appears: 10...9...8.....
 
^ I wish it were the latter but on legal grounds it's probably dicey.

Mostly it comes down to evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the area too many JPP members, on both sides, forget when calling for the heads of those they dislike.

While there are plenty of cases where a person is probably guilty, proving it beyond a reasonable doubt is the problem.

Thanks to modern tech, if a person was recorded screaming "Hang him! Hang him!" then clearly that person is guilty of a criminal act and could be prosecuted. This is what makes the Insurrection different from previous coups; a lot of it was recorded at Trump's behest and uploaded to Facebook. It's that reason why there will be so many convictions coming out of the coup attempt.
 
Exactly. It's like saying "I love my country" but never even vote. You screamed for months about supporting the violence of the Insurrection, "top the steal", how Democrat Marxist have taken over the country, attacking police and backing the militias but when it came down to the nitty gritty, you got scared and confessed you didn't and don't do a damn thing.

I think it's fucking hilarious and even better than if you'd admitted to sending them some money. It's so you. LOL

time until a MAGA emoji appears: 10...9...8.....

Wrong again. I didnt say I supported violence. But,....you are the biggest liar in the forum so I would expect no less from a slithering little worm like you.
 
I'm retired, dumbass.

So you decided it would be a great idea to spend your retirement lying and talking silly all day on an obscure message board? Like I said,....IF you still can you should at least try to get a life while you still have the opportunity.
 
^^^Proof you're a wackadoodle. ^^^

Thanks Mr. Tiny Penis.

hillary-1-jpg.957909
 
It is TOTALLY irrelevant how legally 'extremist' the wife/husband of a SCOTUS judge is.

TOTALLY.

The wife/husband does NOT sit on the bench and has NOTHING to do with it.

Clearly, this is just your hatred for all things right (just as lots of others on here hate all things left) and you trying to belittle a righty judge.

PERIOD.

It is very relevant.
 
Hillary, the world's greatest serial killer, murdering in plain sight and getting away with it! I can't wait for all the true crime novels to come out!

Wasn't she the one who bragged she could murder someone on 5th Avenue and still collect votes?....or was that Bill's Pedo Buddy?

6a44ul.jpg
 
It is TOTALLY irrelevant how legally 'extremist' the wife/husband of a SCOTUS judge is.

TOTALLY.

The wife/husband does NOT sit on the bench and has NOTHING to do with it.

Clearly, this is just your hatred for all things right (just as lots of others on here hate all things left) and you trying to belittle a righty judge.

PERIOD.
It is very relevant.

If it affects Clarence's behavior on the bench, and it appears it has, then, yes, very relevant.
 
Democrats Urge Justice Thomas to Recuse Himself in Capitol Riot Cases

But the text messages from Ms. Thomas, a longtime conservative activist who goes by Ginni, revealed something quite different and deeply troubling, experts said.

The messages from Ms. Thomas to Mark Meadows, President Donald J. Trump’s chief of staff, sent during and just after the fraught weeks between the 2020 presidential election and the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, demonstrated that she was an active participant in shaping the legal effort to overturn the election.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/25/us/supreme-court-clarence-thomas-recusal.html
 
^^^ Authoritarian Asshat disclaims he's attacked people then calls them a "lying sack of ass hair". :rofl2: ^^^

It's okay, Fredo. You can claim to be a pacifist while supporting braver souls to murder children but all that does is prove you are a cowardly weasel. Ask your buddy terrorists, they know what I'm talking about. LOL

68ll8a.jpg


I advise everyone towards pacifism, dickshitter.
 
Back
Top