That's because you are ignoring the counter arguments to your position almost entirely.
He's just asking the same question over and over mindlessly. It's already been answered.
That's because you are ignoring the counter arguments to your position almost entirely.
There are no counter arguments. My idea is obviously right. Democrats just don't like it . It's the same way they treat child molesting. They know molesting kids is wrong but they like to do it and that's that. They know speeding is also wrong but again, they simply like to do it and don't care who they kill. All democrats are psychopaths.
Wasting time does not save money or lives.How much is a human life worth.? What a dumb question. The question is why do we accept 110 americans killed EVERY DAY on the highways when we could easily reduce that to say 20 and save billions of dollars to boot?
So...what do YOU suggest? Life imprisonment? Capital punishment? Theft of your property?As to your claim that no one would obey the 45 - that would depend on the penalty. If caught doing 60 in a 45 resulted in license suspension of a few months, compliance would be very good. Speeding is not a crime of passion or necessity. People do it because they like to and the penalties are so light. If bank robbery was punished by a $200 fine, everybody would do that. THINK, you demented degenerate despicable deranged tranny.
There are no counter arguments. My idea is obviously right. Democrats just don't like it . It's the same way they treat child molesting. They know molesting kids is wrong but they like to do it and that's that. They know speeding is also wrong but again, they simply like to do it and don't care who they kill. All democrats are psychopaths.
Yes - it's that obvious. A 45 mph speed limit would save gas, lives, and money. Unfortunately millions of american drivers are psychopaths and insist on driving 80 mph and hell with the consequences.
Actually i would like to see gas at say $10 a gallon. I truly think it would do more good than harm. People would drive much slower and much less and highway crashes would drop by say 70%. They would drop in cities too even though speed limits there are already under 45. But again fewer people would be driving in the cities.
For those who say the 55 speed limit did not save 9,000 lives a year when it started in 1974, check out this
http://www.publicpurpose.com/hwy-fatal57+.htm
-----deaths------vehicle miles
1971 53,761 1,183,524 4.54
1972 55,704 1,264,614 4.40
1973 55,113 1,316,207 4.19
1974 46,078 1,282,790 3.59
1975 45,500 1,330,074 3.42
1976 45,523 1,402,380 3.25
1977 47,878 1,467,027 3.26
1978 50,331 1,544,704 3.26
Advocating fascism.
So...what do YOU suggest? Life imprisonment? Capital punishment? Theft of your property?
As i said - doing 60 in a 45 should get you a license suspension of several months. Fines are a joke esp for the rich.
HAHAHAHAHA. You forgot to call me a nazi too. HAHAHA. I love watching you trannies explode when posters use arguments you can't refute.
As i said - doing 60 in a 45 should get you a license suspension of several months. Fines are a joke esp for the rich.
Inflation is not profit. Yes...I would say you are mixing up two or more discussions.
Advocating fascism.
Back in 1974 we lowered speed limits to 55 nationally to save gas and it also caused highway fatalities to immediately drop by 9,000 a year. It's a great idea but the auto industry opposes it and they pay the media to brainwash the moron american into thinking he a has the "right" to drive 80 mph. Car crashes mean car sales.

How about no speed limits and thinning down the population a little bit?
