Figures... Leftists Hurl Racist Insults at Black Man After Horrible Beating

And I love that you guys are hitching your wagon to this guy's claim that he was beat up by "union thugs." Next thing you know it will be revealed that he carved a "B" into his own cheek.


wow, you alls selective caring and tolerance is shining through clear and bright..tsk tsk

we've provided you all with videos and articles and you still accuse the man of being a fake..
 
No one was talking to you, hotshot. Damocles responded to a different post and I was responding to him. If you want to ask BAC what he meant by that feel free. Damocles and I are discussing a different matter, specifically, BAC's other point that he made several times now that one person is not "the left" or "leftists."

And I love that you guys are hitching your wagon to this guy's claim that he was beat up by "union thugs." Next thing you know it will be revealed that he carved a "B" into his own cheek.

Again.... for the insanely slow witted... BAC asked if I 'had evidence' this guy was a leftist. he was trying to pretend he could possibly be anything but. His 'argument' that 'one union guy does not equal leftist' is simply bullshit. No one suggested that ONE guy equals the entirety of the left or that one guy could possibly be pluralized.

The Article stated the plural because according to witnesses there were more than one of the union guys harassing this guy.

Given that the union guy ended up in cuffs, I would say it is safe to say that he did indeed commit assault and battery. The video clearly showed the assault portion.

That said, I do think this guy is hamming up his 'injuries'. Because the video also clearly shows him back on his feet and wandering around after the incident.... and now he is in a wheel chair?
 
No, we aren't in any other conversation, sad attempt to dodge away from uncomfortable questions. You are attempting to tell me what BAC was saying, and he is asking about that as well. You aren't the conversation police, especially with public conversations like this one that anybody can participate in.


Hilarious. Here I thought that by quoting a post and writing something in response you were actually addressing the post you quoted. I guess I should assume things. And I'm to trying to be the conversation police, I just thought we could focus the discussion. Apologies for usurping your role.

In any event, BAC can handle himself on this one but I tend to agree with him that one person is not representative of "the left" or "leftists." You are free to disagree.
 
Hilarious. Here I thought that by quoting a post and writing something in response you were actually addressing the post you quoted. I guess I should assume things. And I'm to trying to be the conversation police, I just thought we could focus the discussion. Apologies for usurping your role.

In any event, BAC can handle himself on this one but I tend to agree with him that one person is not representative of "the left" or "leftists." You are free to disagree.

LMAO... NO ONE is disagreeing with that you dolt. NO ONE. That is what makes this so funny. It is a strawman, nothing more.
 
Hilarious. Here I thought that by quoting a post and writing something in response you were actually addressing the post you quoted. I guess I should assume things. And I'm to trying to be the conversation police, I just thought we could focus the discussion. Apologies for usurping your role.

In any event, BAC can handle himself on this one but I tend to agree with him that one person is not representative of "the left" or "leftists." You are free to disagree.
All of this is part of the same conversation, the attempt to cloak yourself in the moral high ground is hilarious, but unnecessary.

Anyway, nobody "automatically" assumed that people were leftists, there are reasons one makes that conclusion.

1. They are part of the union horde bused in to protect their ideation from that fabled "onslaught" of "professional" protesters.

2. There were more than one of them according to eye witness reports. <- Please note this part.

3. While one clearly showed a bit of racism, it didn't change what he was there for or why. <- this one too, he's still a leftist, even if he is also racist.

The conclusion was reached because of who they were, why there were there, what they were willing to do to meet that goal, and lastly who they attacked, not just "automatically."
 
All of this is part of the same conversation, the attempt to cloak yourself in the moral high ground is hilarious, but unnecessary.

Anyway, nobody "automatically" assumed that people were leftists, there are reasons one makes that conclusion.

1. They are part of the union horde bused in to protect their ideation from that fabled "onslaught" of "professional" protesters.

2. There were more than one of them according to eye witness reports. <- Please note this part.

3. While one clearly showed a bit of racism, it didn't change what he was there for or why. <- this one too, he's still a leftist, even if he is also racist.

The conclusion was reached because of who they were, why there were there, what they were willing to do to meet that goal, and lastly who they attacked, not just "automatically."

My guess is Dung is quite embarrassed at this point and thus the odds of his return to this thread are minimal.
 
Again.... for the insanely slow witted... BAC asked if I 'had evidence' this guy was a leftist. he was trying to pretend he could possibly be anything but. His 'argument' that 'one union guy does not equal leftist' is simply bullshit. No one suggested that ONE guy equals the entirety of the left or that one guy could possibly be pluralized.

The Article stated the plural because according to witnesses there were more than one of the union guys harassing this guy.

Given that the union guy ended up in cuffs, I would say it is safe to say that he did indeed commit assault and battery. The video clearly showed the assault portion.

That said, I do think this guy is hamming up his 'injuries'. Because the video also clearly shows him back on his feet and wandering around after the incident.... and now he is in a wheel chair?


The video doesn't show much of what occurred and based on what Kenneth told Laura Ingraham it doesn't seem that the video depicts the incident where he was allegedly beaten.

He claims that he was just handing out flags and these guys came up to him, exchanged words and beat him kicked him. The video shows a union guy taking a nap on the ground with Kenneth nearby and then another union guy pushes Kenneth over and he promptly got up and walked away.
 
The video doesn't show much of what occurred and based on what Kenneth told Laura Ingraham it doesn't seem that the video depicts the incident where he was allegedly beaten.

He claims that he was just handing out flags and these guys came up to him, exchanged words and beat him kicked him. The video shows a union guy taking a nap on the ground with Kenneth nearby and then another union guy pushes Kenneth over and he promptly got up and walked away.

Dooood the video clearly starts after the leftists punched the guy out.
 
Dooood the video clearly starts after the leftists punched the guy out.


Doooood, the guy on the ground isn't Kenneth. The guy on the ground is a union guy and he apparently decided that he wanted to lie down and take a nap at that time. Kenny is the guy that is pushed over a few seconds into it.
 
Doooood, the guy on the ground isn't Kenneth. The guy on the ground is a union guy and he apparently decided that he wanted to lie down and take a nap at that time. Kenny is the guy that is pushed over a few seconds into it.
Doooood the leftists stopped their use of the N-word and fists when they realized they were being filmed. Are you denying the eyewitness account from Kenneth's attorney? Even with Mr. Few Teeth stated on film that he claimed that Kenneth "attacked amerika"?
 
Doooood, the guy on the ground isn't Kenneth. The guy on the ground is a union guy and he apparently decided that he wanted to lie down and take a nap at that time. Kenny is the guy that is pushed over a few seconds into it.

It doesn't matter that you show them the birth certificate or that you articulate facts to them. Their brains are dead and they have precious little to celebrate.

They troll the net looking for non-stories to tout as some "victory."

Those who have been victims of real racism know who the racists are.
 
It doesn't matter that you show them the birth certificate or that you articulate facts to them. Their brains are dead and they have precious little to celebrate.

They troll the net looking for non-stories to tout as some "victory."

Those who have been victims of real racism know who the racists are.
This post is completely disingenuous as to the facts being discussed. You also appear to be preparing to play the race card but lack the balls to do so directly. :pke:

Are you claiming that these three leftists union thugs who used racial slurs at Kenneth while beating him are not racist, buy Kenneth selling "Don't Tread on Me" flags is?
 
This post is completely disingenuous as to the facts being discussed. You also appear to be preparing to play the race card but lack the balls to do so directly. :pke:

Are you claiming that these three leftists union thugs who used racial slurs at Kenneth while beating him are not racist, buy Kenneth selling "Don't Tread on Me" flags is?

What I'm claiming is that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

And by the way .. I say any damn thing I want to say .. you should know that better than anyone.

"race card" is just a bullshit lingustic invention made up by racists used to avoid talking about race.

Throuighout ALL of American history, the left has supported and defended the rights of all Americans and has always been in the forefront of civil rights.

That nonsense you're talking is designed for unlearned people who have no conception of history.
 
The video doesn't show much of what occurred and based on what Kenneth told Laura Ingraham it doesn't seem that the video depicts the incident where he was allegedly beaten.

He claims that he was just handing out flags and these guys came up to him, exchanged words and beat him kicked him. The video shows a union guy taking a nap on the ground with Kenneth nearby and then another union guy pushes Kenneth over and he promptly got up and walked away.

Thanks for restating what I already said. But again, given that the union guy ended up in cuffs, at a minimum he is likely to be charged with assault and more than likely with battery as well.
 
right, that's a bs line that you all spout, but as we see it's very selective who you deem you should support for HUMAN rights..if they don't be on your side, then the hell with them..we see this over and over..just take a look at the support this black conservative you all are not supporting, instead he is being ridiculed, made to look like a nut job, called a n**ger and you all could give a shit less...
 
Last edited:
Doooood, the guy on the ground isn't Kenneth. The guy on the ground is a union guy and he apparently decided that he wanted to lie down and take a nap at that time. Kenny is the guy that is pushed over a few seconds into it.

By the way, I dont think the other guy was a union guy. Notice that Kenneth came up to him in the video afterward when the other guy was holding his shoulder. Though his shirt was a similar color to the union guys (but did not have the big union lettering on his back), so I am not sure on this point.
 
It doesn't matter that you show them the birth certificate or that you articulate facts to them. Their brains are dead and they have precious little to celebrate.

They troll the net looking for non-stories to tout as some "victory."

Those who have been victims of real racism know who the racists are.

Ok, now I understand, a white guy calling a black guy the n word isn't really racist... and the black guy didn't experience REAL racism. Good that you clarified that for us.

Note to self: it is only real racism if the black guy is a liberal and the white guy a conservative.
 
What I'm claiming is that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

And by the way .. I say any damn thing I want to say .. you should know that better than anyone.

"race card" is just a bullshit lingustic invention made up by racists used to avoid talking about race.

Throuighout ALL of American history, the left has supported and defended the rights of all Americans and has always been in the forefront of civil rights.

That nonsense you're talking is designed for unlearned people who have no conception of history.
Of course the opposite is true. The "race card" is used by the Left to stifle debate, as you just demonstrated. And throughout American history, the Democrat Party has resisted civil rights. Legislatively, this has occurred in six civil rights bills: 1868, 1875, 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1968, all sponsored by the GOP and all resisted by Democrats, the most recent by the tag team of Al Gore Sr and former clansman Robert Byrd.

So tell us again who the real racists are here. :pke:
 
Ok, now I understand, a white guy calling a black guy the n word isn't really racist... and the black guy didn't experience REAL racism. Good that you clarified that for us.

Note to self: it is only real racism if the black guy is a liberal and the white guy a conservative.

Add a PS to that memo to self .. you have no clue.

IF a racist slur was used, it should be condemned .. but I'm betting there were other black people there and I'm betting they have a very different account of what happened than you do.

This is what I know .. black people don't stand around and watch other black people being called the "N" word without responding.

I also know the left is not racist .. as does everyone else with a brain.

I'm not surprised that you don't know that.
 
Of course the opposite is true. The "race card" is used by the Left to stifle debate, as you just demonstrated. And throughout American history, the Democrat Party has resisted civil rights. Legislatively, this has occurred in six civil rights bills: 1868, 1875, 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1968, all sponsored by the GOP and all resisted by Democrats, the most recent by the tag team of Al Gore Sr and former clansman Robert Byrd.

So tell us again who the real racists are here. :pke:

Listening to the right constantly use "racist" is quite a joy. If only my father were alive to hear this bullshit.

Your thoughts about democrats standing against civil rights is stupid as fuck and the only democrats to stand against it were dixiecrats .. from the south, the land of ignorant and racist people. The very same dixiecrats who vote with republicans.

There is no point in telling you who the racists are my brother. You do not have the capacity to interpret what is truth because you speak in ideology, not common sense.

Case in point .. you decried the American education system as being fucked up by democrats. Quite obviously you never thought about that before you said it.

You're from the south, which is ther last bastion of republican conservative voters .. and the most uneducated and racist region of the country.

Let me put this another way .. the most uneducated and ignorant people in all of America live in republican dominated states and districts.

Have you ever asked yourself why the VAST majority of the best schools in the nation are located in democratic-controlled states and regions?

NAW, you didn't .. or you wouldn't have made such a foolish and ill-thought out comment.

You speak in ideology, not intelligence.

But you're probably considered a genius amongst your "peers."
 
Back
Top