no, I was commenting on the fallacy of the statement I quoted.
I did not follow this case at all (apart as a current event back when it happened) so I have no opinion one way or the other. As I noted the other day, if the citizen's arrest angle didnt resonate then guilty was a given.
My brother was in the building industry in Atlanta and they have quite a severe problem with people stealing construction materials and general destruction of vacant property there (going so far as to rip out copper pipe from vacant homes for example). So there is a justification for attempting to nab someone you suspect is going to do this. But it seems like this may not have been sufficiently demonstrated or maybe its just a case that there are pretty tightly defined rules for citizen arrest.
But its over and done so maybe Atlanta can get back to work fixing undesirable election outcomes.