It looks like the jury is giving it thought.

Dutch Uncle said:
Yes, I was wrong. Imagine my surprise that endangering the lives of others isn't a problem as long as you were panicking about saving your own skin.
Click to expand...
who endangered the lives of others? the mob trying to kill a kid or the kid trying to save his life????

Dutch Uncle said:
Sooooo.....according to you, if a person is wrong on one thing, he's wrong on all things. Fascinating. Even more fascinating is your admission that if you saw a man shoot down two unarmed men that your would not consider them to be an active shooter.
Click to expand...
you operate on that premise.........i'm just following your lead. If I saw those events with huber and grosskreutz, I'd have ended up shooting the kickface guy first, then huber, hopefully before he got a chance to hit rittenhouse, and MAYBE grosskreutz..........but I already know I see things in a more realistic light than you do.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Sadly, agreed. To paraphrase Trump's comments about the pedophile Ghislaine Maxwell, "I wish him well". Kyle has a chance to rebuild his life. If no one hears from him again, that's what he's doing.
Click to expand...

We'll see. You know the RW media, the NRA, the militias and all the other crazies are going to try to get him to be a spokesperson, give speeches, etc. He's already tasted the praise of the white supremacists he was told to quit hanging out with pre-trial.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
We'll see. You know the RW media, the NRA, the militias and all the other crazies are going to try to get him to be a spokesperson, give speeches, etc. He's already tasted the praise of the white supremacists he was told to quit hanging out with pre-trial.
Click to expand...

His choice. I hope he chooses wisely.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
who endangered the lives of others? the mob trying to kill a kid or the kid trying to save his life????

you operate on that premise.........i'm just following your lead. If I saw those events with huber and grosskreutz, I'd have ended up shooting the kickface guy first, then huber, hopefully before he got a chance to hit rittenhouse, and MAYBE grosskreutz..........but I already know I see things in a more realistic light than you do.
Click to expand...

Kyle when shooting endangered the reporter and unknown male. Self-defense overrides the charge.

Maybe you'll get your chance to prove me wrong.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I noticed that you completely glossed over my legal example of the bank robbery circumstance.............
Click to expand...

In the bank robbery scenario, it's easier to tell the difference between the good guys from the bad guys.

You keep dodging the larger question that if you walked up on a man who just shot two unarmed people that you'd automatically assume he's a good guy but you won't explain how you can tell or why someone who shot them dead would automatically be guilty of murder.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
In the bank robbery scenario, it's easier to tell the difference between the good guys from the bad guys.

You keep dodging the larger question that if you walked up on a man who just shot two unarmed people that you'd automatically assume he's a good guy but you won't explain how you can tell or why someone who shot them dead would automatically be guilty of murder.
Click to expand...

if you're talking about the rittenhouse scenario, it would be extremely easy to see since he's being attacked by someone with a rock, a skateboard, a foot, and a handgun.............all while not shooting any other person........but then it's already very apparent that i'm much more intelligent and objective than you'll ever be, so..........there is that
 
.

In case anyone forgot the title of this thread ...

It looks like the jury is giving it thought.

I'd say that they gave it a lot of thought.
 
Grumpy said:
.

In case anyone forgot the title of this thread ...

It looks like the jury is giving it thought.

I'd say that they gave it a lot of thought.
Click to expand...

The jury did a good job, w/ a tough case that had a lot of national visibility.

Imo, there just wasn't enough under the law to charge or convict him. But the circumstances need to be discussed. These kinds of situations can be avoided, fairly easily.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if you're talking about the rittenhouse scenario, it would be extremely easy to see since he's being attacked by someone with a rock, a skateboard, a foot, and a handgun.............all while not shooting any other person........but then it's already very apparent that i'm much more intelligent and objective than you'll ever be, so..........there is that
Click to expand...

Feel better now?

Meh, the Jury ruled. Here's to more dead terrorists and vigilantes. :clink:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It's very tempting to say that if Rittenhouse had been black he would have been convicted. But there would have been no murders to begin with, because if a black kid had showed up wearing a weapon, the police would have busted him on the spot.
Click to expand...

Correct application of CRT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top