The Backfire Effect

[Cancel 2018. 3]

This study showed that it would not and does not happen in reverse.

My guess is you're full of shit. There's no way anyone can say if Obama has the original unless he shows the original. Failing to produce the original is evidence that he doesn't have the original, not that he has it and doesn't want you to see it.

Also, nitpicking over whether the "certification of birth" counts as a "birth certificate" is totally and utterly retarded. The fact is he has proven his citizenship as much as he needs to. The burden of proof now lies on the loons who want to say he's not constitutionally eligible for office.

as to those samples only....you can't refute that, so you're full of shit

and moron....the state of HI said they have the original on file....if their lying about that....what else are they lying about....go get some facts buddy

and its not nitpicking, it is the truth, you don't like it, take it up with HI and i can tell you still haven't reviewed to codes to find out why there is a difference, especially in a dispute about the validity of the document

 

[cawacko]

But where did I say he was responsable for the decrease in gas prices? Where? Where? Where?

Keep your pants on dude I've been on I-5 all freaking day.

Here is the question you originally asked:

"""Does he get credit for the decrease in gas prices? This is a huge drop in Gas prices!!!?""""

My answer:

No he does not get credit for the decrease in gas prices because gas prices have risen while he is in office.

I then added he does not get blamed for the rise in gas prices either.

Pretty simple.

 

[uscitizen]

So the right has tried to turn this into a debate on Obama's citizenship?

I figured it would be that or abortion.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

So the right has tried to turn this into a debate on Obama's citizenship?

I figured it would be that or abortion.

wrong as usual, ib1 brought it up

and ib1....i suggest you read the last part of the study before you embarass yourself further by claiming i'm full of shit as to the sample:

In addition, it would be valuable to replicate these findings with non-college
students or a representative sample of the general population.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

and another nail in ib1's coffin....man, you should really read your own crap before telling other people their full of shit...

It would also be helpful to test additional corrections of liberal misperceptions.
Currently, all of our backfire results come from conservatives – a finding that may
provide support for the hypothesis that conservatives are especially dogmatic (Greenberg
and Jonas 2003; Jost et al. 2003a, 2003b). However, there is a great deal of evidence that
liberals interpret factual information in ways that are consistent with their political
26
predispositions (e.g. Bartels 2002 133-137 or the stem cell experiment above). Without
conducting more studies, it is impossible to determine if the results we observe are
systematic or the result of the specific misperceptions tested.

 

[maineman]

wrong as usual, ib1 brought it up

and ib1....i suggest you read the last part of the study before you embarass yourself further by claiming i'm full of shit as to the sample:

RIIIGHT! I am sure that UNeducated blue collar red neck conservatives would NOT display the backfire effect like their college educated brethren.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

RIIIGHT! I am sure that UNeducated blue collar red neck conservatives would NOT display the backfire effect like their college educated brethren.

stupid bigot false preacher....your words are worthless and as usual untrue...as if those not in college have never been in college or have not educated themselves otherwise....and your bigotry against uneducated blue collar workers is noted asshole

you are an embarrassment to liberals

 

[maineman]

stupid bigot false preacher....your words are worthless and as usual untrue...as if those not in college have never been in college or have not educated themselves otherwise....and your bigotry against uneducated blue collar workers is noted asshole

you are an embarrassment to liberals

are you suggesting that the less education that conservatives have the LESS likely they will be to exhibit the backfire effect?

And keep my profession out of the conversation GAC, and I'll keep yours out....OK?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Priceless, self skewered.

actually....not really....see the quotes from the end of the article that debunk ib1's claims in this thread

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Grind is an open-minded conservative. He likes to call himself liberal-leaning, but he's really only liberal-leaning in his attitude. He is very right-wing, policy wise, to the point where it sometimes it suprises me and IB1 (this is when we're not having mutual masturbation sessions), but we get along well.

so when you guys get together and masterbate each other....then grind becomes more liberal.....LOL

 

[uscitizen]

actually....not really....see the quotes from the end of the article that debunk ib1's claims in this thread

That did not devalue the conclusion about conservatives at all.

You are self skewered.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

are you suggesting that the less education that conservatives have the LESS likely they will be to exhibit the backfire effect?

And keep my profession out of the conversation GAC, and I'll keep yours out....OK?

fuck off....i've asked you repeatedly to leave my profession out and all you do is say i am failed lawyer, or call me counselor or whatever, you just did it yesterday or the day before you lying sack of watermark poop

i've showed from the study that it is not in fact all conservatives, and in fact only applies to that sample and NOT the general population and i've shown that liberals exhibit the same trait.....all from the study and you and your masterbating friends all said this wasn't true and that i'm wrong...too bad you didn't read to the end of the study despite trying to make fun of me for not doing so......self pwnage preacher

deal with it

 

[maineman]

fuck off....i've asked you repeatedly to leave my profession out and all you do is say i am failed lawyer, or call me counselor or whatever, you just did it yesterday or the day before you lying sack of watermark poop

i've showed from the study that it is not in fact all conservatives, and in fact only applies to that sample and NOT the general population and i've shown that liberals exhibit the same trait.....all from the study and you and your masterbating friends all said this wasn't true and that i'm wrong...too bad you didn't read to the end of the study despite trying to make fun of me for not doing so......self pwnage preacher

deal with it

NO ONE has said that the study implicated ALL conservatives.... that is a red herring.

and like I said, leave my profession out of it and I'll leave yours out of it. Here you are in this very thread telling everyone you are an attorney, yet you don't want me mentioning it? fine. give me the same courtesy or STFU..... counselor.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

That did not devalue the conclusion about conservatives at all.

You are self skewered.

since you seem incapable of addressing the actual study...i'll put their words in reply and i don't you feel like a moron for saying cons brought up the birth issue when it was ib1.....

In addition, it would be valuable to replicate these findings with non-college
students or a representative sample of the general population.

It would also be helpful to test additional corrections of liberal misperceptions.
Currently, all of our backfire results come from conservatives – a finding that may
provide support for the hypothesis that conservatives are especially dogmatic (Greenberg
and Jonas 2003; Jost et al. 2003a, 2003b). However, there is a great deal of evidence that
liberals interpret factual information in ways that are consistent with their political
26
predispositions (e.g. Bartels 2002 133-137 or the stem cell experiment above). Without
conducting more studies, it is impossible to determine if the results we observe are
systematic or the result of the specific misperceptions tested.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

NO ONE has said that the study implicated ALL conservatives.... that is a red herring.

and like I said, leave my profession out of it and I'll leave yours out of it. Here you are in this very thread telling everyone you are an attorney, yet you don't want me mentioning it? fine. give me the same courtesy or STFU..... counselor.

see....there you go again with the dishonesty....you've told the entire board, asshole that i'm attorny, i NEVER mentioned it on this board until you repeatedly brought it up..YOU continually bring up you false preacher....

and i already said the "all conservatives" was resolved earlier with ib1...i'm now talking about the sample study group, i said it applies only to that group, you and ib1 and others said no way....i showed you the report that said it applied only to that group and was not representative as they have yet to conduct further tests....

either keep up or stfu

simple really

 

[Cypress]

It aint crap. It's true, which is precisely WHY IT REINFORCES YOUR BELIEF THAT IT'S NOT.

The war in iraq was still justified.


and the french moved the WMD to iran.

 

[ib1yysguy]

and another nail in ib1's coffin....man, you should really read your own crap before telling other people their full of shit...

The backlash effect isn't exhibited by liberals. The study doesn't say that, sorry. The big difference is that when liberals are shown the refutation, the number who believe the false information goes down. When conservatives are shown a refutation, the number who believe the false information increases. That's the big, glaring difference.

 

[Cypress]

The backlash effect isn't exhibited by liberals. The study doesn't say that, sorry. The big difference is that when liberals are shown the refutation, the number who believe the false information goes down. When conservatives are shown a refutation, the number who believe hthe false information increases. That's the big, glaring difference.

In fact, the rare republican/conservative that can admit they were wrong, usually end up becoming independents or democrats. Like topspin, watermark or a few others.

Its the ones that are emotionally invested in being a conservtive, that cling to false or debunked information with a death grip.

See: Dixie, Bravo, Yurt. etc

 

[maineman]

..YOU continually bring up you false preacher....

that is a lie, counselor. YOU do


you call me a false preacher and I will call you a failed gofer associate in a dinky ass law firm....

see how that works?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

The backlash effect isn't exhibited by liberals. The study doesn't say that, sorry. The big difference is that when liberals are shown the refutation, the number who believe the false information goes down. When conservatives are shown a refutation, the number who believe the false information increases. That's the big, glaring difference.

It would also be helpful to test additional corrections of liberal misperceptions.
Currently, all of our backfire results come from conservatives – a finding that may provide support for the hypothesis that conservatives are especially dogmatic (Greenberg
and Jonas 2003; Jost et al. 2003a, 2003b). However, there is a great deal of evidence that
liberals interpret factual information in ways that are consistent with their political
26
predispositions

did you even read this?