Yes, I did thoroughly read what the WHO themselves said. YOU didn't.
This is the SECOND and AMENDED DEFINITION of 'herd immunity' by the WHO, you fucking idiot... It was in red text.OMFG....
Literally the first sentence:
Anatta (and the blue text from the WHO) is correct. The red text from the WHO is political propaganda filled lies.Last year, Anatta said that we could achieve herd immunity WITHOUT a vaccination if everyone was infected with COVID.
That is it. Nothing else need be said. Americans immunity levels have decreased over the last couple of decades. All that pampering and not getting outside. We are paying for panty waisted liberal policies from decades. Not only have we weakened our children physically, we have done so mentally also.
They said it multiple times in the red text portion. I underlined many of those instances for emphasis. Obviously you didn't read or comprehend it.
BUT, you purposely act as if you are oblivious to the blue text that I sent you (and what I underlined in that text). There, the WHO said that herd immunity can be achieved naturally (WITHOUT VACCINES).
You don't achieve herd immunity by exposing people to a virus, DIPSHIT.
Anatta is correct.
I posted TWO of their definitions
That's the whole point. I even color coated them in blue and red for easy distinction between the two. Learn how to read and comprehend English.
In the blue text, they said it is achieved via NATURAL EXPOSURE (and vaccines can assist with it). In the red text, they changed to being liars (due to politics) and said that it can only be achieved via vaccines.
RQAA.
Inversion Fallacy.
The WHO said exactly what Anatta said. Read the blue text, moron.
Continued purposeful ignorance of the blue text.
Continued purposeful ignorance of the blue text.
This is the SECOND and AMENDED DEFINITION of 'herd immunity' by the WHO, you fucking idiot... It was in red text.
Anatta (and the blue text from the WHO) is correct. The red text from the WHO is political propaganda filled lies.
Hello Darth,
I get it why you are overlooking a valid point. It sort of destroys your argument.
That point being: While healthy children may not face as much of a death risk from COVID, they are still able to transmit the disease and perpetuate the pandemic.
You keep focusing on the risk to children, but children are not the only people at risk. The disease does not care who it has to go thru to get to it's victims.
And there are lots of children in the hospital with COVID.
And there are children who are not perfectly healthy, for whom catching COVID could be a death sentence.
Do you value children with asthma less than other children?
Anatta (and the blue text from the WHO) is correct. The red text from the WHO is political propaganda filled lies.
Recent reports show that children are accounting for 15 percent of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. as the delta variant causes an uptick in cases around the country.
According to new data collected by the American Academy of Pediatrics, almost 94,000 COVID-19 cases in children were reported over a two-week period from July 29 to Aug. 5, which the academy dubbed "a continuing substantial increase."
Since the pandemic began, nearly 4.3 million children have tested positive for the virus — 14.3 percent of total cumulative cases.
The new figures come as children's hospitals in COVID-19 hot spots have reported an increase in young patients battling the virus.
Arkansas Children’s Hospital in Little Rock reported that of 23 patients admitted for COVID-19 under the age 18, 10 were in the ICU and five were placed on ventilators.
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/5...cent-of-us-coronavirus-cases-are-now-children