Sir Spamalot is triggered.
Democrat terrorists released by the hundreds while every 1/6 protester faces prison
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
Sir Spamalot is triggered.
Anyone can look at the thread and see you fly off the handle and then refuse to defend yourself.
I do? Thanks for informing me of what I think.
After a thousand times of explaining it, absolutely. I refuse to debunk your endless spam 1001 times. You got me.
You didn't explain shit.
You stole from other people and used that.
Then I responded to each line of what you stole, and instead of dealing with it, you just fell back into the bad habit of spamming the board with plagiarized bullshit.
I took the time to address your stupid post, line-by-line, and you ran away from it because you're a coward.
That's why you were nowhere near DC on 1/6; you didn't have the guts then, and you don't have the guts now.
I wish this was complicated so Arnimius's terrible thread made sense, but it does not. BLM was trying to make America live up to the constitution and stop police from abusing minorities. The rights that Arminius approves of, were trying to destroy the country and had a violent insurrection.
Denial doesn't magically make the first thousand explanations just vanish, dumb-ass. You can't pretend away reality.
Show me WHO ELSE it was who wrote the detailed description of everything that is untrue about your argument that you made here to me, on this site you fucking imbecile.
The fact that it's tailored specifically to a debate between us should tell you you're just being an embarrassing moron with this made-up "plagiarism" bullshit just like everything else.
*
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
Time for anther 50-post Sir Spamalot meltdown.
So then why have you been in denial on the post I made where I tore apart that which you had plagairized?
GFM, Into the Night, Dukkha
You didn't tailor anything...you just added a word or two but kept the meat of what you stole from someone else.
What bullshit was debunked? You're the one who didn't go to DC on 1/6 because you're full of shit.
I took this apart, line by line on this thread and you didn't even want to respond because you have nothing to respond with that is your original content.
What a little bitch.
This may be the single most hilariously stupid thing I may have ever read someone post on this site with a straight face.
Burning down cities over self-defense is...to make us follow the Constitution?
I suppose violently silencing everyone who disagrees with them...was to restore free speech?
And extorting businesses for money with death threats...was to restore property rights?
Do they also have sex to increase their virginity?
Imagine being so retarded as to actually think that BLM burns down cities.
No wonder you didn't go to DC on 1/6; you can't even stand behind your posts on JPP...
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
I answered this whole thing you stole from someone else on this thread and you avoided it like you avoided DC on 1/6.
This may be the single most hilariously stupid thing I may have ever read someone post on this site with a straight face.
Burning down cities over self-defense is...to make us follow the Constitution?
I suppose violently silencing everyone who disagrees with them...was to restore free speech?
And extorting businesses for money with death threats...was to restore property rights?
Do they also have sex to increase their virginity?
What cities were burned down? Can you even get near the truth. The reds, your peeps, tried to overthrow the government and install a liar to the throne. It would have been a throne because they were trying to make it so elections do not matter unless the right wing approves of the results. Barr and McConnell admitted the election was fair and one of them should tell Trump that. There has not been a more serious threat to the existence of America since 1812. Blacks demonstrating were no threat to the country. None, zero. The significance of 1-6 will be proclaimed if history as long as America survives, assuming it does. It will not if you rightys succeed.
You must know better than you are posting. Why are you doing it?
Don't expect anything more than a litany of plagiarized responses.