That was not honestly my point. You just do no seem to understand what logic is. It's not the all-encompassing personification of everything that's rational. It deals with making LOGICAL arguments. Newton's third law of motion IS NOT LOGIC. IT IS PHYSICS.
And you have been making arguments all throughout this thread that are LOGICALLY FALLACIOUS, and justifying them by saying that's HOW LOGIC SEES IT.
No, it's you who has demonstrated a lack of knowledge and understanding about what "logic" is. I never claimed it was the "all-encompassing personification of everything that's rational" those are your words. Throughout this thread, this is what you have pulled... you take things I say out of context, reinterpret them to mean something absurd, then regurgitate them out, as if you are arguing against absurdity. It's really amazing to watch you do this, kinda like watching someone make sausage.
Newton's third law can have logic applied, just like his first and second law, and any other law of physics. Logic doesn't have to be "science" to apply it to science. Logic is a collection of knowledge and wisdom we use to reason. It combines elements of math, physics, science, literature, philosophy, and plain old common sense (of which you have none).
When we apply logic to the question of why the universe came to be, there are two possible answers, it was either designed and created by something, or it wasn't. The universe either has purpose and reason, or it doesn't. There is a meaning behind the universe, or there isn't any meaning. If you wish to draw a conclusion that nothing created it, and no purpose, reason, or meaning exists for the universe, then you've stopped logically exploring possibility, and you've made a determination. Once you have made this determination, you have stopped using logic, therefore, you are being "without logic" or "devoid of logic" ....il-logic-al!
