Pennsylvania voting machine error due to "coding."

anchovies said:
The MAGA militia already took over sixty similar type cases to Court and lost everyone of them including even the Trump SCOTUS
Click to expand...

Did they?

Legion said:
DEMOCRATS like to claim that "Trump lost all the legal cases".

Let’s take a look.

The majority of the lawsuits were about constitutional issues, mail in ballot deadlines, insufficient poll observers, etc.

The most important of the fraud lawsuits was Texas v Pennsylvania.

That wasn't lost - it was rejected due to a lack of standing. Pirkle v. Wolf was withdrawn. Metcalfe v. Wolf wasn't heard because of a technicality. Supposedly the deadline to file a Class ll lawsuit had passed.

In Michigan, Bally v. Whitmer was withdrawn after the judge denied a request for an independent audit. King vs. Whitmer was denied because it was "too late" and the “ship has sailed.”

Feehan v. Wisconsin was denied due to a lack of standing.

Trump v. Hobbs was dropped because Arizona finished counting their votes before the case could be heard.

Bowyer v. Ducey was rejected due to a lack of standing. Burk v. Ducey was dismissed “lack of standing and the failure to file a timely verified election contest.” Pearson v. Kemp was dismissed as moot because the court lacked jurisdiction. Wood v. Raffensberger was denied for a lack of standing and because it was filed too late.

None of these cases were rejected on merit or evidential grounds.
Click to expand...

These cases were rejected or withdrawn for procedural reasons, time constraints, etc. Not one was "lost".

Every state had to certify their results by December 8th. On December 14th the Electoral College had to vote. On January 5th Congress had to certify the results. Of all this would have been fine, except that the DEMOCRATS extra-legally extended balloting way past the statutory limits in key states - by design.

That left very short timeframes to gather evidence, file suits, and then argue it before (mainly hostile) courts. Multiple state elections had to be challenged to overturn the results. SCOTUS refused to get involved.

So here we are, and now that the dust has settled, DEMOCRATS refuse to allow a second look.
 
Legion said:
03a092eefa60d39b5a7753ae3a14eb88.png
Click to expand...

I just tell it like it is!

And if you and DOnald Trump weren't such sore asses over losing the election- YOU WOULD"T BE OUT HERE SHOWING US YOUR SORE ASSES TODAY!

baboon.jpg


IMG_4192-583fbaff3c856__700.jpg
 
Legion said:
By attacking the source without addressing the issue?
Click to expand...

I did address the issue by posting the FACT CHECK to the original post.

There is no way for me to address your opiate abuse issue or your BUTT-HURT issues- AS YOU WILL HAVE TO GO AND DEAL WITH THOSE YOURSELF!
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
This has all been fact-checked time and time again and proven false As FAR BACK AS NOVEMBER!
Click to expand...

Who fact-checked the fact-checkers?

While social media giant Facebook portrays its fact-checking feature as neutral and independent, the personnel, funding streams, and credentialing mechanism behind the participating organizations indicates otherwise.

Facebook launched the fact-checking feature shortly after Donald Trump won the presidential election in 2016.

It says it has since partnered with more than 50 fact-checking organizations around the world.

Facebook didn’t respond to a request for further information, such as its full list of fact-checkers and how much Facebook pays them for the service.

Posts flagged as false by the partners not only get furnished with a warning label and a link to the fact check, but are also throttled on the platform, meaning Facebook “significantly reduces the number of people who see it,” the company says on its website.

What gets fact-checked is determined by Facebook based on “signals, like feedback from people on Facebook.”

Facebook fact-checkers supposedly need to be certified by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN).

Facebook describes the organization as nonpartisan, but the IFCN was set up by Poynter, a leftist "journalism nonprofit", and in 2019, was almost entirely funded by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar—a major DEMOCRAT donor—as well as Google and progressive billionaire George Soros. Facebook is also listed as one of the previous donors.

Who gets certified and who doesn’t is decided by the IFCN’s advisory board. One member is Glenn Kessler, former foreign policy reporter and now the head of the "fact-checking" feature at The Washington Post. Kessler and his team recently published a book called “Donald Trump and His Assault on Truth.” How impartial is that?

The other American is Angie Drobnic Holan, editor-in-chief at left-leaning PolitiFact, which is owned by Poynter. Holan characterized the other board members as “very knowledgeable about U.S. politics and fact-checking practices.”

Since September 2018, PolitiFact has conducted more than 1,400 fact checks for Facebook with 84 percent giving the verdict of “false.”

Its largest financial sponsor is major DEMOCRAT donor Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund.

“Thousands of statements labeled as untrue or misleading are more properly considered the habitual verbal excess for a man known for his immoderate form of communication,” commented Mark Hemingway, senior writer at RealClearInvestigations.

“Further, a great many of the objections to Trump’s statements amount to argumentative quibbles that aren’t really ‘fact checks.’”

On Sept. 18, the IFCN announced a collaboration project of 10 fact-checkers and the two largest Spanish-language American broadcasters, Univision and Telemundo, “to fight mis/disinformation during a presidential campaign” and “expose the record 32 million Latino voters in the U.S. to accurate election-related information from Sept. 15, 2020 through Inauguration Day in 2021.”

The sponsor of the effort is WhatsApp, which is owned by Facebook.

Facebook recently positioned itself as a major and unprecedented influence in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election after its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, announced new election-related content rules, a $300 million donation to local DEMOCRAT campaigns, and a drive to "help" 4 million people register and vote this year.




https://www.theepochtimes.com/facebook-fact-checkers-dominated-by-left-leaning-funding-personnel-organizations_3508014.html
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
TRUMP!
Click to expand...

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan famously said, “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Lately it seems it is becoming trickier and trickier to determine what is in fact, a fact.

There are many who wish to be the arbiters of what is and is not fact. A number of these self-appointed arbiters also want to be the supreme judge of what is truth.

Are we to accept their pronouncements blindly? Or should we question everything, as Thomas Jefferson suggested?
 
Legion said:
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan famously said, “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Lately it seems it is becoming trickier and trickier to determine what is in fact, a fact.

There are many who wish to be the arbiters of what is and is not fact. A number of these self-appointed arbiters also want to be the supreme judge of what is truth.

Are we to accept their pronouncements blindly? Or should we question everything, as Thomas Jefferson suggested?
Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with anyone asking questions.

No Sir, No one is trying to be the arbiters of what is fact or what is not facts.

What this is, is one group (Politico- AND Factcheck.org & STATE ELECTION OFFICIALS) using actual facts to present there case- AND DONALD TRUMP, GIULIANI, AND THE REST OF YOU TRUMPTARDS MAKING ACCUSATIONS AND EXAGGERATIONS WITHOUT USING ANY FACTS TO BACK YOURSELVES UP WITH!
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
What this is, is one group (Politico- AND Factcheck.org & STATE ELECTION OFFICIALS) using actual facts to present there case- AND DONALD TRUMP, GIULIANI, AND THE REST OF YOU TRUMPTARDS MAKING ACCUSATIONS AND EXAGGERATIONS WITHOUT USING ANY FACTS TO BACK YOURSELVES UP WITH!
Click to expand...

The largest fact-checking organizations in the United States all exist on the left side of the ideological spectrum: Reuters, USA Today, Lead Stories, Factcheck.org, Politifact, Science Feedback, The Associated Press, Snopes, and AFP Fact-Check.

They all like to say their fact-checking organizations are vetted by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), a group they claim is nonpartisan. But that organization was created by Poynter, a self-proclaimed journalism nonprofit organization almost completely funded by Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay and a major donor to DEMOCRAT organizations and candidates.

Poynter is also heavily funded by Google and Marxist-Progressive billionaire George Soros.

The IFCN is ruled by a seven-member board from around the world. Two of its members are from the United States: Glenn Kessler and Angie Drobnic Holan. Kessler was the former head of The Washington Post’s fact-checking project and Holan is the editor-in-chief at Politifact, which, ironically, is owned by Poynter.

https://nationalfile.com/facebooks-fact-checkers-are-a-list-of-whos-who-on-the-left/
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Seems a county in Pennsylvania using Dominion voting machines found during a recent primary that the machines only printed Democrat ballots leaving many non-Democrats angry. The election officials say it was Dominion's error, the company claiming their equipment worked flawlessly in the 2020 election...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...msn&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn_feed

I'd say this is a verifiable case of how--potentially--using electronic voting machines could be set up via coding alone to rig an election. While this error was obvious and caught, it's more proof that if the coding were either deliberately set up to rig and election or inserted maliciously by a hacker, that electronic voting should not be trusted for a minute.
Click to expand...

Do away with them totally and go back to paper ballots. Networks and cable outlets will just have to wait for the hand count before calling states.

Now watch democrats kick and scream.
 
Phantasmal said:
“Fayette County Commissioner Scott Dunn stresses the ballot issues are across party lines.”

“He said there are problems with barcodes on the ballots. As far as why this is happening, Dunn said it’s not the machines but a third-party printing issue.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/pittsb...ines-in-fayette-co-not-accepting-ballots/?amp
Click to expand...

That’s why I don’t bother to fact check these lying assholes any more. Used to, but it’s become a waste of time, knowing that it’s always gonna be some sort of bullshit anyway.
 
Phantasmal said:
“Fayette County Commissioner Scott Dunn stresses the ballot issues are across party lines.”

“He said there are problems with barcodes on the ballots. As far as why this is happening, Dunn said it’s not the machines but a third-party printing issue.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/pittsb...ines-in-fayette-co-not-accepting-ballots/?amp
Click to expand...

This is a problem with electronic voting machines using a paperless ballot. What happens when say, next time the ballot runs through the machine but doesn't get counted? How would the voter know that happened? It's absolutely clear here that electronic voting needs major, major security and code validation upgrades to be trusted.
 
Legion said:
The largest fact-checking organizations in the United States all exist on the left side of the ideological spectrum: Reuters, USA Today, Lead Stories, Factcheck.org, Politifact, Science Feedback, The Associated Press, Snopes, and AFP Fact-Check.

They all like to say their fact-checking organizations are vetted by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), a group they claim is nonpartisan. But that organization was created by Poynter, a self-proclaimed journalism nonprofit organization almost completely funded by Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay and a major donor to DEMOCRAT organizations and candidates.

Poynter is also heavily funded by Google and Marxist-Progressive billionaire George Soros.

The IFCN is ruled by a seven-member board from around the world. Two of its members are from the United States: Glenn Kessler and Angie Drobnic Holan. Kessler was the former head of The Washington Post’s fact-checking project and Holan is the editor-in-chief at Politifact, which, ironically, is owned by Poynter.

https://nationalfile.com/facebooks-fact-checkers-are-a-list-of-whos-who-on-the-left/
Click to expand...

Thanks!

But you have not said anything to give anyone any reason to dispute the accuracy of any position or conclusion of any these Fact-Checking sources you mentioned.

They all have good reputations for providing fair, balanced, fact-checking based upon well known- established facts.

YOU CAN'T JUST ATTACK THEM JUST BECAUSE YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THEM AND WITHOUT PROVIDING FACTS THAT outdate or SUPERSEDE THEIRS.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Seems a county in Pennsylvania using Dominion voting machines found during a recent primary that the machines only printed Democrat ballots leaving many non-Democrats angry. The election officials say it was Dominion's error, the company claiming their equipment worked flawlessly in the 2020 election...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...msn&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn_feed

I'd say this is a verifiable case of how--potentially--using electronic voting machines could be set up via coding alone to rig an election. While this error was obvious and caught, it's more proof that if the coding were either deliberately set up to rig and election or inserted maliciously by a hacker, that electronic voting should not be trusted for a minute.
Click to expand...

Thank god you Trump assholes lost.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top