What are DEMOCRATS afraid of?

L

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
ba530297-a636-4753-970b-35d76907b1fc-730x487.jpg


Pamela S. Karlan, who heads the Justice Department’s civil rights division, wrote a letter to the president of the Arizona state Senate suggesting that the recount of nearly 2.1 million ballots in Maricopa County by a private contractor may not comply with federal law, which requires that ballots be securely maintained for 22 months following a federal election.

“We have a concern that Maricopa County election records, which are required by federal law to be retained and preserved, are no longer under the ultimate control of elections officials, are not being adequately safeguarded by contractors, and are at risk of damage or loss,” she wrote.

In her letter, Karlan also asked questions about a plan to interview voters and ask them whether they cast ballots in November.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/arizona-recount-justice-department/2021/05/06/fbe4793c-ae87-11eb-b476-c3b287e52a01_story.html
 
Legion said:
ba530297-a636-4753-970b-35d76907b1fc-730x487.jpg


Pamela S. Karlan, who heads the Justice Department’s civil rights division, wrote a letter to the president of the Arizona state Senate suggesting that the recount of nearly 2.1 million ballots in Maricopa County by a private contractor may not comply with federal law, which requires that ballots be securely maintained for 22 months following a federal election.

“We have a concern that Maricopa County election records, which are required by federal law to be retained and preserved, are no longer under the ultimate control of elections officials, are not being adequately safeguarded by contractors, and are at risk of damage or loss,” she wrote.

In her letter, Karlan also asked questions about a plan to interview voters and ask them whether they cast ballots in November.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/arizona-recount-justice-department/2021/05/06/fbe4793c-ae87-11eb-b476-c3b287e52a01_story.html
Click to expand...

We know what they're afraid of, facts. The head imbecile himself said it, we care more about truth than facts. Truth can be manipulated, looked at CNN but facts...no so much. That's why the court cases were tossed out for process not because anything was decided. The morons took that as "truth" that no election fraud occurred. Fuck the facts
 
Yakuda said:
We know what they're afraid of, facts. The head imbecile himself said it, we care more about truth than facts. Truth can be manipulated, looked at CNN but facts...no so much. That's why the court cases were tossed out for process not because anything was decided. The morons took that as "truth" that no election fraud occurred. Fuck the facts
Click to expand...

DEMOCRATS like to claim that "Trump lost all the legal cases".

Let’s take a look.

The majority of the lawsuits were about constitutional issues, mail in ballot deadlines, insufficient poll observers, etc.

The most important of the fraud lawsuits was Texas v Pennsylvania That wasn't lost - it was rejected due to a lack of standing. Pirkle v. Wolf was withdrawn. Metcalfe v. Wolf wasn't heard because of a technicality. Supposedly the deadline to file a Class ll lawsuit had passed.

In Michigan, Bally v. Whitmer was withdrawn after the judge denied a request for an independent audit. King vs. Whitmer was denied because it was "too late" and the “ship has sailed.”

Feehan v. Wisconsin was denied due to a lack of standing.

Trump v. Hobbs was dropped because Arizona finished counting their votes before the case could be heard.

Bowyer v. Ducey was rejected due to a lack of standing. Burk v. Ducey was dismissed “lack of standing and the failure to file a timely verified election contest.” Pearson v. Kemp was dismissed as moot because the court lacked jurisdiction. Wood v. Raffensberger was denied for a lack of standing and because it was filed too late.

None of these cases were rejected on merit or evidential grounds.
 
Legion said:
DEMOCRATS like to claim that "Trump lost all the legal cases".

Let’s take a look.

The majority of the lawsuits were about constitutional issues, mail in ballot deadlines, insufficient poll observers, etc.

The most important of the fraud lawsuits was Texas v Pennsylvania That wasn't lost - it was rejected due to a lack of standing. Pirkle v. Wolf was withdrawn. Metcalfe v. Wolf wasn't heard because of a technicality. Supposedly the deadline to file a Class ll lawsuit had passed.

In Michigan, Bally v. Whitmer was withdrawn after the judge denied a request for an independent audit. King vs. Whitmer was denied because it was "too late" and the “ship has sailed.”

Feehan v. Wisconsin was denied due to a lack of standing.

Trump v. Hobbs was dropped because Arizona finished counting their votes before the case could be heard.

Bowyer v. Ducey was rejected due to a lack of standing. Burk v. Ducey was dismissed “lack of standing and the failure to file a timely verified election contest.” Pearson v. Kemp was dismissed as moot because the court lacked jurisdiction. Wood v. Raffensberger was denied for a lack of standing and because it was filed too late.

None of these cases were rejected on merit or evidential grounds.
Click to expand...

Winner winner chicken dinner

But the filthy bastards perpetuate the lie.
 
Legion said:
DEMOCRATS like to claim that "Trump lost all the legal cases".

Let’s take a look.

The majority of the lawsuits were about constitutional issues, mail in ballot deadlines, insufficient poll observers, etc.

The most important of the fraud lawsuits was Texas v Pennsylvania That wasn't lost - it was rejected due to a lack of standing. Pirkle v. Wolf was withdrawn. Metcalfe v. Wolf wasn't heard because of a technicality. Supposedly the deadline to file a Class ll lawsuit had passed.

In Michigan, Bally v. Whitmer was withdrawn after the judge denied a request for an independent audit. King vs. Whitmer was denied because it was "too late" and the “ship has sailed.”

Feehan v. Wisconsin was denied due to a lack of standing.

Trump v. Hobbs was dropped because Arizona finished counting their votes before the case could be heard.

Bowyer v. Ducey was rejected due to a lack of standing. Burk v. Ducey was dismissed “lack of standing and the failure to file a timely verified election contest.” Pearson v. Kemp was dismissed as moot because the court lacked jurisdiction. Wood v. Raffensberger was denied for a lack of standing and because it was filed too late.

None of these cases were rejected on merit or evidential grounds.
Click to expand...

So what you're saying is your guy is a fuck up
 
Yakuda said:
Winner winner chicken dinner

But the filthy bastards perpetuate the lie.
Click to expand...

These cases were rejected or withdrawn for procedural reasons, time constraints, etc. Not one was "lost".

Every state had to certify their results by December 8th. On December 14th the Electoral College had to vote. On January 5th Congress had to certify the results. Of all this would have been fine, except that the DEMOCRATS extra-legally extended balloting way past the statutory limits in key states - by design.

That left very short timeframes to gather evidence, file suits, and then argue it before (mainly hostile) courts. Multiple state elections had to be challenged to overturn the results. SCOTUS refused to get involved.

So here we are, and now that the dust has settled, DEMOCRATS refuse to allow a second look.
 
Legion said:
These cases were rejected or withdrawn for procedural reasons, time constraints, etc. Not one was "lost".

Every state had to certify their results by December 8th. On December 14th the Electoral College had to vote. On January 5th Congress had to certify the results. Of all this would have been fine, except that the DEMOCRATS extra-legally extended balloting way past the statutory limits in key states - by design.

That left very short timeframes to gather evidence, file suits, and then argue it before (mainly hostile) courts. Multiple state elections had to be challenged to overturn the results. SCOTUS refused to get involved.

So here we are, and now that the dust has settled, DEMOCRATS refuse to allow a second look.
Click to expand...

Right because as has already been established they prefer "truth" to facts
 
Yakuda said:
We know what they're afraid of, facts. The head imbecile himself said it, we care more about truth than facts. Truth can be manipulated, looked at CNN but facts...no so much. That's why the court cases were tossed out for process not because anything was decided. The morons took that as "truth" that no election fraud occurred. Fuck the facts
Click to expand...

:thumbsup:
 
The election results have already been recounted and certified, so this thing is intended to grift suckers out of cash.

And there are no bigger suckers than Conservatives.
 
The fix is in. It's crystal clear now that not only was the election rigged but so is everything post-election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top