Obama=Liar & Puts american soldiers lives at risk

Southern Man said:
No.
Click to expand...

Hahaha, sure he is, a gay person is one who is attracted to the opposit sex.


If a stright person is attracted to women but does not act on that attraction, is he still stright?


So by your defination, no celebate priests are stright?
 
Superfreak said:
1) A peer reviewed report that 'queer' is deragatory? LMAO... you really are a fucking moron

2) LMAO.... seriously how to you come up with this crap

3) So you are finally admitting that being 'stable' or 'unstable' has NOTHING to do with the number of partners. Good boy.

4) Again moron... it is not a strawman to comment directly on what you wrote. You stated men of character only have one partner. I mocked you for your ignorance.
Click to expand...

1. No response, you fat fucker?
2. Ditto.
3. Strawman.
4. Ditto, Fatso.
 
Superfreak said:
You stated he 'went out with the boys' and didn't like prostitutes. I simply drew the logical conclusion. Which again explains why you are so fearful to have anyone find out you are hiding in the closet. It also explains why you are so brazenly bigotted towards homosexuals. You figure if you mock them and degrade them enough it might just hide your own 'special feelings'.
Click to expand...
You call it a logical conclusion, yet you offer no logical basis, while I have provided another alternate conclusion entirely consistent with my moral values. This makes you a liar, as well as brazenly fat. Now you infer something else but lack the courage to say it.
 
WinterBorn said:
Considering the insults passed back and forth, I think neither gets points for any insults.

You brought your father into the discussion. I didn't see where "Fatass" was a relevant part of the debate.
Click to expand...
Every time he calls me "bigot" or its variants I call him "fatso" or its variants. You will see a similar pattern with his other insults: tit for tat, and always instituted by him. Since he has lowered the bar in exasperation to insult my family I have scored massive points. :)
 
WinterBorn said:
Did I claim to have done anything?

And I think there is a difference between you being at home and a soldier overseas.

But your response does tell me that you are passing judgements on people in the military and I bet you didn't (or haven't) been in.
Click to expand...
My response is as stated: may father, as a moral man, has never hired a prostitute, nor have I.
 
Socrtease said:
But they are there anyway and serving their country with distinction as many times as not, just like everyone else that puts on the uniform. I served with soldiers that were gay, and because I was a bit more open minded than your normal Southern Man so they confided in me. They showered with us, they went to the field with us and they even went to war with us. They used to say that Black men and women should not serve along side whites. They said they weren't smart enough, they weren't brave enough, that they would hurt morale. All of those things were lies, bald faced, bigoted lies, just as what is said about gays serving in the military is a lie now. I served during Bush I and we had a top notch intelligence analyst get accidentally outed while I was in. My Battalion commander swore that if ANYONE was found out reporting her their lives would become a living hell under his command. He was not losing an intel analyst of her caliber because she didn't like sex with men. The policy of removing soldiers from duty based on who they sleep with hurts the military and national security. This guy that is being discharged now has served two tours in Iraq and has led men. His queerness didn't keep him from doing it.
Click to expand...

Every issue that you raised has already been addressed. If they keep their sexuality discrete, there shouldn't be any problem.
 
Jarod said:
Hahaha, sure he is, a gay person is one who is attracted to the opposit [sic] sex.


If a stright[sic] person is attracted to women but does not act on that attraction, is he still stright[sic]?


So by your defination[sic], no celebate[sic] priests are stright[sic]?
Click to expand...
You are clearly confused.
 
Robdawg said:
Commandment #1 Thou Shalt Not Kill (please see Title V Section III of bible for dummies)


Title V Section III

Thou shalt not kill (unless in the navy and serving morally)
Click to expand...

Actually, Rob, 'thou shalt not kill' comes in at commandment number 6 after such things as 'thou shalt have no other Gods before me'.

God, in his infinite wisdom, obviously treasured his self-image over other less important issues, such as human life.
 
Southern Man said:
If the soldier morally serves his nation he is not a killer in the Biblical sense.
Click to expand...

WTF?? Please point out the scripture that allows a man to kill someone for the state and it not be against Judeo-Christian laws.
 
Southern Man said:
Every time he calls me "bigot" or its variants I call him "fatso" or its variants. You will see a similar pattern with his other insults: tit for tat, and always instituted by him. Since he has lowered the bar in exasperation to insult my family I have scored massive points. :)
Click to expand...

He calls you a bigot based on your posts on this forum. I fail to see where his weight has any bearing at all on any of these discussions.

Since his initial insults were based on information in the posts and yours were insults aimed at him personally, he should also score massive points.

He did not bring his weight up and you brought your father up in this thread. So he should get massive points again.
 
Jarod said:
Confused? How so? Dont just throw rocks... try to explain yourself! Are Catholic Priests stright or not?
Click to expand...
The vast majority are straight and celibate. You are obviously taking the back door into the subject of homosexual priests. The church's stance on that issue is expressed here:
* The Catechism distinguishes between homosexual acts and homosexual tendencies. Regarding acts, it teaches that Sacred Scripture presents them as grave sins. The Tradition has constantly considered them as intrinsically immoral and contrary to the natural law. Consequently, under no circumstance can they be approved.

* In the light of such teaching, this Dicastery, in accord with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, believes it necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practise homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called "gay culture".

* Different, however, would be the case in which one were dealing with homosexual tendencies that were only the expression of a transitory problem - for example, that of an adolescence not yet superseded. Nevertheless, such tendencies must be clearly overcome at least three years before ordination to the diaconate.
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instru...nd_to_Holy_Orders#Quotes_from_the_Instruction
 
charver said:
Actually, Rob, 'thou shalt not kill' comes in at commandment number 6 after such things as 'thou shalt have no other Gods before me'.

God, in his infinite wisdom, obviously treasured his self-image over other less important issues, such as human life.
Click to expand...
You've stumbled upon something that actually is true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top