wow, did you or could you read that lame ass shit? do you just not know English well enough to know these words are not inciting violence, but they are talking about rising up in protest of chickenshit corrupt pigs like trump? protest is not violence. rising up is not violence. taking it to the streets is not violence. you are a moron. from your whiny ass bullshit article-
In 2018, Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California said on MSNBC that if Trump fired special counsel Robert Mueller, there would be “widespread civil unrest” as people would “take to the streets.”
Similarly, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper agreed that if Trump fired Mueller, it would “set off a firestorm not only on the Hill but also in the streets.”
WHERE IS EITHER ONE ADVOCATING VIOLENCE? widespread civil unrest is not violence, MLK lead many marches that could be called civil unrest, but the only violence was from cops and racist pigs who attacked the non-violent protesters. ass.
again, easily frightened trump stooge, from your silly ass article-
That same year, Sen. Cory Booker urged people to answer a “call to action” to protest at the Capitol. “Please, get up in the face of some congresspeople,” Booker said at a conference.
Failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said civility was only an option if the Democrats controlled the legislative branch. “You can’t be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for and what you care for,” she said in 2018.
a call to action is violent? getting up in somebody's face when they lie about what is going on is violent? only to a sissy. and not being civil is violent? only to an easily frightened trump stooge.
again, from your lame ass article-
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder encouraged a group of “liberal activists,” to fight back, a sentiment that was met with applause and laughter. “Michelle [Obama] always says, ‘When they go low, we go high,’” Holder began. “No. No. When they go low, we kick them.”
In 2019, Rep. Joaquin Castro said Democrats would “fight [Trump] and challenge him in every way that we can in the Congress, in the courts, and in the streets and protests,” if the president declared a national emergency about a government shutdown.
to fight back when the repubs lie and delay and obstruct does not mean with violence. you could punch out turtle boy and it would not affect how chickenshit the republicans in congress are and how they put politics above country. and are you really so frightened a 60 year old guy saying if you go low i will kick you scares you even a tiny bit, and you really think he means literally "kick you?" and challenging someone in congress, in court and in protests is advocating violence? maybe to a chickenshit trump voter.
again, from your stupid shit article-
In 2019, when Trump was considering declaring a “national emergency” over the then-gov’t shutdown, Rep.
@JoaquinCastrotx
said if he did, Democrats would “fight him … in the streets”
well, since we know trump would not personally ever be close to any real action and not in his bunker or inside the white house with hundreds of guards, how could Joaquin fight him, if you think he meant punching fatboy out for being such a piece of shit?