Why weren't they impeached for inciting violence?
Senators stunned by footage of Capitol siege
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
Why weren't they impeached for inciting violence?
no worries
Verified User
As usual, teabaggers are FOS.
"That's right," Harris replied. "But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop, and this is a movement, I'm telling you."
"They're not gonna stop, and everyone beware, because they're not gonna stop," she added. "They're not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they're not gonna stop after Election Day."
"Everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they're not going to let up — and they should not. And we should not," she concluded.
"We must always defend peaceful protest and peaceful protesters," she said. "We should not confuse them with those looting and committing acts of violence, including the shooter who was arrested for murder."
"Make no mistake, we will not let these vigilantes and extremists derail the path to justice," she added.
The words attack or riot never was said by Harris, none said they were sent by Harris.
Dotard's cult did, they were saying "take the capitol" at Dotard's ego rally.
no worries
Verified User
Because they didn't.
moon
Satire for Sanity
You've always been a Banana Republican, Leg-iron.
Haw, haw................................haw.
No, I used to post as a DEMOCRAT, Loon.
Sometimes I still do.
Haw, haw................................haw.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
that was not any legitimate BLM protesters, chickenshit bitch liar. and it was not the capitol, as part of an insurrection, urged on the president of the US, to stop the results of a fair and free election just because trump refused to believe he got his fat chickenshit traitor ass kicked, you pig sucking asshole.
NOT EVEN CLOSE, BITCH.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
they never incited violence. either you are too lazy to read what they said in context, or too stupid to read, or just a goddamn chickenshit liar who knows better but still lies about it.
Port Tack
Verified User
What the fuck does BLM riots have to do with Trumps insurrection? Are you saying that because a bunch of assholes rioted in Minneapolis that what Trump did was perfectly acceptable?
Port Tack
Verified User
One has to be a complete fucking moron to think there is any equivalency here.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Err............................................
Haw, haw......................................................haw.
Port Tack
Verified User
I think we all know that the spineless assholes in the senate will never convict Trump but who really cares, the country is watching. The people know Trump is guilty as hell and their opinion of those who vote to let the asshole off is that they are disgusting. Republicans are pulling out of that party by the thousands practically every day and Trump will never again be elected to dog catcher much less political office. He is going to be found guilty of crimes in GA as well as NY long before another election and only his most devout cult members will still vote for him.
10 Times Democrats Urged Violence Against Trump And His Supporters
https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/0...ed-violence-against-trump-and-his-supporters/
Dispute it, assfaces...
no worries
Verified User
Agreed, Nixon's approval rating AFTER he resigned was still 37%.
Dotard was right one his comment, he could shoot and kill someone in the middle of the day on 5th avenue in NYC, and not lose a voter.
Dotard could kill his cult member's wife and rape their daughters and they would still support the retard.
Jim Jones wished he had a cult as gullible and stupid.
no worries
Verified User
Sen. Jon Tester of Montana took it one step further, encouraging people to “punch Trump in the face.”
“I don’t think even in states where Donald Trump won big that it does you any good running away from [him],” Tester said. “I think you need to go back and punch him in the face. I mean, the truth is, is this guy is bad for this country.”
1 out of 10?
Not too bad, LOL.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
wow, did you or could you read that lame ass shit? do you just not know English well enough to know these words are not inciting violence, but they are talking about rising up in protest of chickenshit corrupt pigs like trump? protest is not violence. rising up is not violence. taking it to the streets is not violence. you are a moron. from your whiny ass bullshit article-
In 2018, Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California said on MSNBC that if Trump fired special counsel Robert Mueller, there would be “widespread civil unrest” as people would “take to the streets.”
Similarly, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper agreed that if Trump fired Mueller, it would “set off a firestorm not only on the Hill but also in the streets.”
WHERE IS EITHER ONE ADVOCATING VIOLENCE? widespread civil unrest is not violence, MLK lead many marches that could be called civil unrest, but the only violence was from cops and racist pigs who attacked the non-violent protesters. ass.
again, easily frightened trump stooge, from your silly ass article-
That same year, Sen. Cory Booker urged people to answer a “call to action” to protest at the Capitol. “Please, get up in the face of some congresspeople,” Booker said at a conference.
Failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said civility was only an option if the Democrats controlled the legislative branch. “You can’t be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for and what you care for,” she said in 2018.
a call to action is violent? getting up in somebody's face when they lie about what is going on is violent? only to a sissy. and not being civil is violent? only to an easily frightened trump stooge.
again, from your lame ass article-
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder encouraged a group of “liberal activists,” to fight back, a sentiment that was met with applause and laughter. “Michelle [Obama] always says, ‘When they go low, we go high,’” Holder began. “No. No. When they go low, we kick them.”
In 2019, Rep. Joaquin Castro said Democrats would “fight [Trump] and challenge him in every way that we can in the Congress, in the courts, and in the streets and protests,” if the president declared a national emergency about a government shutdown.
to fight back when the repubs lie and delay and obstruct does not mean with violence. you could punch out turtle boy and it would not affect how chickenshit the republicans in congress are and how they put politics above country. and are you really so frightened a 60 year old guy saying if you go low i will kick you scares you even a tiny bit, and you really think he means literally "kick you?" and challenging someone in congress, in court and in protests is advocating violence? maybe to a chickenshit trump voter.
again, from your stupid shit article-
In 2019, when Trump was considering declaring a “national emergency” over the then-gov’t shutdown, Rep.
@JoaquinCastrotx
said if he did, Democrats would “fight him … in the streets”
well, since we know trump would not personally ever be close to any real action and not in his bunker or inside the white house with hundreds of guards, how could Joaquin fight him, if you think he meant punching fatboy out for being such a piece of shit?
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Wow, lefties are finally into watching clips of political violence, finally.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
LOL. Funny. Too bad too many people don't understand the difference between a insurrection against the Federal government and a riot in a city.