The student had every right to ask the question, as millions of others wanted to know. When Frank tried to avoid the question, the student asked again and Frank became defiant. He looked like a boob IMO.
Frank gave a 5 minute dissertation on what took place with the funds that went to AIG and who gave them etc. If it didn't meet your expectations, what would you have him say unless it met your political view? He didn't give you the answer you wanted, thus you call it avoidance. Can you tell me what the original question was? On my version, the video started with a reply, not a question. How could Frank "avoid" a question you never heard?
That said, why was the student's original question left out of the video if it was the point of the entire piece? Might one suspect a little bit of selective editing to manufacture a point? Why was it necessary to title the the film/thread in a misleading way? Some might call it yellow journalism.