Guns don't kill people, conservatives with guns kill people.

It can and must happen. I would like to see police guns replaced by non-fatal weapons such as tasers while we ar at it.

so you want the police to have tasers and the crimials ak47's an mac 10's.....what are you planin to arm the obama youth with....
 
The Constitution is cool, but it's not perfect. The Founders recognized and invented the amendments.

What made sense in the past does not now. Today we don't need a militia to defend the country. The Second Amendment has been twisted by gun nuts and their well-financed lobbyists who just don't care about people.

We are going to change.
 
The Constitution is cool, but it's not perfect. The Founders recognized and invented the amendments.

What made sense in the past does not now. Today we don't need a militia to defend the country. The Second Amendment has been twisted by gun nuts and their well-financed lobbyists who just don't care about people.

We are going to change.

You keep saying the same thing while ignoring the fact that you cannot possibly get 38 states to ratify a constitutional amendment repealing the 2nd amendment.
 
Polls show the people want more gun control, it shouldn't be that difficult to persuade them that the first step is to get rid of the amendment.
 
The Constitution is cool, but it's not perfect. The Founders recognized and invented the amendments.

What made sense in the past does not now. Today we don't need a militia to defend the country. The Second Amendment has been twisted by gun nuts and their well-financed lobbyists who just don't care about people.

We are going to change.

we need a "milita" to protect overselves from the government....
 
To give you an idea of what you are working against, in the US there are 38 states that have "shall issue" laws concerning concealed weapons permits.

This means that the laws have been changed to make it so a person who qualifies to have a ccw gets one. This is a big step in making gun laws more loose.

And 2 states have no permits required laws, which mean they can carry concealed weapons without a permit at all.
 
Polls show the people want more gun control, it shouldn't be that difficult to persuade them that the first step is to get rid of the amendment.

What polls? I have seen no poll that shows even close to a 3/4 ruling.
 
The 2nd amendment was never intended to be misinterpreted as a free for all used by renegade mob mentality bigots calling themselves "unofficial militias" and other mentally demented people.

The reason we have laws and law enforcement (gun control), is because we have human predators running amok, with easily available guns to misuse against society, while screaming, "My guns are protected by the 2nd Amendment." While they may think their guns are protected by the 2nd Amendment, which they aren't, they also aren;t when they pose a serious threat to society.
 
The 2nd amendment was never intended to be misinterpreted as a free for all used by renegade mob mentality bigots calling themselves "unofficial militias" and other mentally demented people.

The reason we have laws and law enforcement (gun control), is because we have human predators running amok, with easily available guns to misuse against society, while screaming, "My guns are protected by the 2nd Amendment." While they may think their guns are protected by the 2nd Amendment, which they aren't, they also aren;t when they pose a serious threat to society.

you keep clicking your heals together dorthy....guns are legal and there are plenty of people willing to fight to the death to keep it that way.....but my guess is that is the intent of this rehtoric to bait the other side....
 
The 2nd amendment was never intended to be misinterpreted as a free for all used by renegade mob mentality bigots calling themselves "unofficial militias" and other mentally demented people.

The reason we have laws and law enforcement (gun control), is because we have human predators running amok, with easily available guns to misuse against society, while screaming, "My guns are protected by the 2nd Amendment." While they may think their guns are protected by the 2nd Amendment, which they aren't, they also aren;t when they pose a serious threat to society.

As a matter of fact, our gun owning rights are protected by the 2nd amendment. You can keep claiming they are not, but the SCOTUS has ruled in our favor.
 
Do you classify everyone by whether they are brave or cowardly? A very simple, and entirely inadequate, view if I may say.
Why would anyone feel so desperate that he/she feels that killing people is the only solution?
Classify him as a coward? Stupid, dumb cop.
The rest of your comment is so ridiculous and shows such ignorance that further response would be a waste.


so this man was brave.....he took on unarmed civilians then shot himself before he could take on the police.....yea a real hero.....he fled his own country rather than stand and fight....
 
Do you classify everyone by whether they are brave or cowardly? A very simple, and entirely inadequate, view if I may say.
Why would anyone feel so desperate that he/she feels that killing people is the only solution?
Classify him as a coward? Stupid, dumb cop.
The rest of your comment is so ridiculous and shows such ignorance that further response would be a waste.

wow..
we are talking about our rights under our Constitution to keep and bear arms..the reason it was put there, is to be able to fight against tyranny from our Government..

and the big majority of gun owner are responsible, respectful of guns, (not looking to go and just KILL someone).. and believe in that thing called our Constitution that we seem to have to continue fight against all the chickenshit people in this country who are afraid of guns and wish to trample on our rights..

sheesh..
 
Do you classify everyone by whether they are brave or cowardly? A very simple, and entirely inadequate, view if I may say.
Why would anyone feel so desperate that he/she feels that killing people is the only solution?
Classify him as a coward? Stupid, dumb cop.
The rest of your comment is so ridiculous and shows such ignorance that further response would be a waste.

he was a coward.......do you insult everyone you to which you respond .....
 
HE FEARED THE 'OBAMA GUN BAN'.... The latest gun massacre occurred this morning in Pittsburgh. This one had a more political bent than most.

A man opened fire on officers during a domestic disturbance call Saturday morning, killing three of them, a police official said. Friends said he recently had been upset about losing his job and that he feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns. [...]

Friends identified the suspect as Richard Poplawski, 23, but police would not immediately confirm his name. The gunman was arrested after a four-hour standoff, police said. [...]

Edward Perkovic said Poplawski, his best friend, feared "the Obama gun ban that's on the way" and "didn't like our rights being infringed upon."

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017604.php
 
HE FEARED THE 'OBAMA GUN BAN'.... The latest gun massacre occurred this morning in Pittsburgh. This one had a more political bent than most.

A man opened fire on officers during a domestic disturbance call Saturday morning, killing three of them, a police official said. Friends said he recently had been upset about losing his job and that he feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns. [...]

Friends identified the suspect as Richard Poplawski, 23, but police would not immediately confirm his name. The gunman was arrested after a four-hour standoff, police said. [...]

Edward Perkovic said Poplawski, his best friend, feared "the Obama gun ban that's on the way" and "didn't like our rights being infringed upon."


http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017604.php

well he was right to fear the Obama taking our rights to have guns..he has said many times that is what he believes. but that didn't give him the right to go out and kill innocent people..the guy had problems other than worrying about the kid, Obama
 
Last edited:
Your "right" does not exist. Can't loose what you never had.

are you a friggen wind up parrot..or just some Democrat tool let loose on people to torment the shit out of them..I'd vote on both..good gawd
 
It's because of gunnuts that our southern border is full of violent crimes, as Secretary Clinton admitted.

"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to re-institute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder said. "I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum."

Holder said reinstating the ban would decrease the flow of guns from the U.S. into Mexico.
 
It's because of gunnuts that our southern border is full of violent crimes, as Secretary Clinton admitted.

"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to re-institute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder said. "I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum."

Holder said reinstating the ban would decrease the flow of guns from the U.S. into Mexico.

guns in the hands of mexicans......
 
U.S. gun stores and gun shows are the source of more than 90 percent of the weapons being used by Mexico's ruthless drug cartels, according to U.S. and Mexican law enforcement officials.

"It's a war going on in Mexico, and these types of firearms are the weapons of war for them," said Bill Newell, the special agent in charge of the Phoenix field division of the ATF, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which has primary law enforcement jurisdiction for investigating gun trafficking to Mexico.

"It's virtually impossible to buy a firearm in Mexico as a private citizen, so this country is where they come," said Newell.
 
Back
Top