If the USAF Vet deserved to be shot at the capitol, then what about this kid?

Bull&Terrier said:
too much a coward to answer the question?
Click to expand...

The question is rhetorical. You don't want an answer. Your analogy is idiotic, unless of course you think that 'explosive' was threatening the Vice President of the United States, or a member of Congress. Is Pence on the other side of that barricade? Didn't think so.
 
Bull&Terrier said:

https://www.wibc.com/blogs/tony-kat...who-threw-bomb-at-federal-agents-in-portland/



Would the cops have been justified shooting this kid more or less so than the USAF Vet lady shot at the capitol?
Click to expand...

Any rioter who engages in any kind of violence or destruction or uses any kind of weapon against anyone else, especially law enforcement deserves to be arrested and jailed.

If such a person resists arrest with violence and puts law enforcement in fear for their lives or safety, the appropriate amount of force should be used against that person, including being shot if it comes to that.
 
Concart said:
The question is rhetorical. You don't want an answer. Your analogy is idiotic, unless of course you think that 'explosive' was threatening the Vice President of the United States, or a member of Congress. Is Pence on the other side of that barricade? Didn't think so.
Click to expand...




oh so the VP is more important than the surround LEO's and people in my video? is that what you are saying your life is less important?


I disagree.


and no, the question was not rhetorical, it's to demonstrate duplicity and hypocrisy and thus far it's going gangbusters.
 
Nomad said:
Any rioter who engages in any kind of violence or destruction or uses any kind of weapon against anyone else, especially law enforcement deserves to be arrested and jailed.

If such a person resists arrest with violence and puts law enforcement in fear for their lives or safety, the appropriate amount of force should be used against that person, including being shot if it comes to that.
Click to expand...




I appreciate the answer and agree with you.


I personally don't think the USAF vet went that far, in this case, clearly the kid did.
 
Bull&Terrier said:
oh so the VP is more important than the surround LEO's and people in my video? is that what you are saying your life is less important?


I disagree.


and no, the question was not rhetorical, it's to demonstrate duplicity and hypocrisy and thus far it's going gangbusters.
Click to expand...

No, it's rhetorical. And yes, he is. Any other questions, traitor?
 
Comparisons that make this complete nonsense

1. Kid is outside. / Capitol shooting was inside. No one was shot for climbing over a fence at the Capitol.
2. Kid is not breaking anything to enter but simply climbing over a fence. / Capitol shooting was breaking a window and trying to crawl through into an occupied corridor where police were tasked with protecting lives.
3. No federal employees visible when this kid climbs over fence. / The corridor was offices of Congress members who were sheltering from the attack.
4. No police officers are killed in your video where this took place. / Police officer was killed in the attack on the Capitol.
5. No lives threatened. / Police were tasked with protecting Congress and staffers from attack.

The list goes on and on. The biggest comparison is that no one is trying to claim the kid was innocent but you are trying to imply that someone who could be considered a serious threat to member of Congress should not have been shot.
If the same situation had happened at the White House with Trump in the building, I expect that the Secret Service would have done the exact same thing and shot someone trying to climb through a window into a corridor where the President and employees were sheltering. I would not be here claiming they shouldn't have been shot.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Comparisons that make this complete nonsense

1. Kid is outside. / Capitol shooting was inside. No one was shot for climbing over a fence at the Capitol.
2. Kid is not breaking anything to enter but simply climbing over a fence. / Capitol shooting was breaking a window and trying to crawl through into an occupied corridor where police were tasked with protecting lives.
3. No federal employees visible when this kid climbs over fence. / The corridor was offices of Congress members who were sheltering from the attack.
4. No police officers are killed in your video where this took place. / Police officer was killed in the attack on the Capitol.
5. No lives threatened. / Police were tasked with protecting Congress and staffers from attack.

The list goes on and on. The biggest comparison is that no one is trying to claim the kid was innocent but you are trying to imply that someone who could be considered a serious threat to member of Congress should not have been shot.
If the same situation had happened at the White House with Trump in the building, I expect that the Secret Service would have done the exact same thing and shot someone trying to climb through a window into a corridor where the President and employees were sheltering. I would not be here claiming they shouldn't have been shot.
Click to expand...



Amazing that they didn’t want the police to protect Pense who was there and is Vice President of the USA
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Comparisons that make this complete nonsense

1. Kid is outside. / Capitol shooting was inside. No one was shot for climbing over a fence at the Capitol.
2. Kid is not breaking anything to enter but simply climbing over a fence. / Capitol shooting was breaking a window and trying to crawl through into an occupied corridor where police were tasked with protecting lives.
3. No federal employees visible when this kid climbs over fence. / The corridor was offices of Congress members who were sheltering from the attack.
4. No police officers are killed in your video where this took place. / Police officer was killed in the attack on the Capitol.
5. No lives threatened. / Police were tasked with protecting Congress and staffers from attack.

The list goes on and on. The biggest comparison is that no one is trying to claim the kid was innocent but you are trying to imply that someone who could be considered a serious threat to member of Congress should not have been shot.
If the same situation had happened at the White House with Trump in the building, I expect that the Secret Service would have done the exact same thing and shot someone trying to climb through a window into a corridor where the President and employees were sheltering. I would not be here claiming they shouldn't have been shot.
Click to expand...





The kid missed, thats the only reason no one died.


he was charged with felony arson.



I don't get why you think looking through a window is worse than throwing a v8 can full of nails and explosives at a federal building and police.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top