Unlike you, I read reports when they come out.
Unlike you, when I cite those reports, I do my homework to know what I'm talking about.
I don't believe YOU read the report. Instead, I think you did a quick Google search for something and this turned up, you didn't read it, didn't do any of the research into who wrote it, and then you came on JPP and just lied about it.
You lied about how "MI-6 backed it". They didn't back it. That was a lie.
You lied about how it's "exhaustive". I've read it. It's not exhaustive. So that was also a lie.
You lied about how the IC "lies to advance their agenda" while holding up a report from people in the IC. And then, if you say "well it's not an IC report", I say "then who fucking cares?"
You're such a sloppy liar that it makes it so fucking easy for me to tear your shit apart.
So these goalposts have now shifted three times.
First, you said this was a valid Intel report.
Then, you said that MI-6 "backs it up".
Then, you said it is not even an Intel report at all.
Then, you said "there are IC references in there that 'back it up;"
So that's you changing your story three times now.
You're a liar. All you do on here is lie. This thread is yet more proof of how much of a pathological liar you are.
You never, ever, ever tell the full truth here. Never. Not once. You lie, you distort, you manipulate, you cherry pick. That's why I don't buy your fiction that you opposed Iraq. It is totally incongruous with what you are saying and doing today.