Bush the pussy..

[NOVA]

coulda shoulda woulda....

if pigs had wings, away they'd fly.

Clinton was NEVER found guilty of any crime... he was not guilty of perjury... and you absolutely DO excuse any misleading statements made by Team Bush because YOU are a partisan hack...

boooooring.

Team Bush ??? What the hell does Bush have to do with this ? It happened long before Bush....and the link is posted....but I can see that a moron would miss that....

Clinton admitted to his lies...confessed to lying under oath.....he lied under oath to a material fact concerning sex with a women to worked for him, in a sexual harassment case...........perjury...

 

[maineman]

Team Bush ??? What the hell does Bush have to do with this ? It happened long before Bush....and the link is posted....but I can see that a moron would miss that....

Clinton admitted to his lies...confessed to lying under oath.....he lied under oath to a material fact concerning sex with a women to worked for him, in a sexual harassment case...........perjury...

not perjury unless he is charged and convicted of it...which he clearly wasn't...as per your link.

sorry.

And this came up, because you and your ilk wasted the nation's time with going after CLinton for lying bout a blowjob, while you admit giving Bush a free pass on all of his misleading about Iraq.

hack.

 

[NOVA]

not perjury unless he is charged and convicted of it...which he clearly wasn't...as per your link.

sorry.

And this came up, because you and your ilk wasted the nation's time with going after CLinton for lying bout a blowjob, while you admit giving Bush a free pass on all of his misleading about Iraq.

hack.

hahaha....we had this conversation years ago.....are you still gonna tell everyone , with a straight face....that if you're not convicted of the crime, you didn't in fact, do it....
Do you really think anyone but you is gonna buy it.....like OJ didn't do it, because he was found not guilty....
Being found not guilty has absolutely nothing to do with whether a person in fact committed the crime or not....

You probably break the speeding laws every day...but have never gotten a ticket, etc....does that mean you weren't speeding....that you didn't break the law...THE YOU WERE GUILTY OF BREAKING THE SPEEDING LAW ???

Are you wearing your clown outfit tonight ?

 

[NOVA]

not perjury unless he is charged and convicted of it...which he clearly wasn't...as per your link.

sorry.

And this came up, because you and your ilk wasted the nation's time with going after CLinton for lying bout a blowjob, while you admit giving Bush a free pass on all of his misleading about Iraq.

hack.

Bush didn't mislead anyone .... he was telling you what be believed, what the 16 intell. agencys believed, what various intell agencys around the world believed.....same as the Clinton Admin. did during the previous 5 years....

YOU telling ME what you believe can never be called lying if you actually believe what you're telling me....

 

[maineman]

Bush didn't mislead anyone .... he was telling you what be believed, what the 16 intell. agencys believed, what various intell agencys around the world believed.....same as the Clinton Admin. did during the previous 5 years....

YOU telling ME what you believe can never be called lying if you actually believe what you're telling me....

wrong. His team said that "there is no doubt". THAT was a lie. There had ALWAYS been varying degrees of doubt...even your NIE showed degrees of uncertainty....

Now if he had said "I have no doubt".... that would NOT necessarily have been a lie...but that is not what they said.

sorry.

words mean things.

 

[NOVA]

wrong. His team said that "there is no doubt". THAT was a lie. There had ALWAYS been varying degrees of doubt...even your NIE showed degrees of uncertainty....

Now if he had said "I have no doubt".... that would NOT necessarily have been a lie...but that is not what they said.

sorry.

words mean things.

Indeed...words do have meanings

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,)

Not we suspect, not we think, not we imagine, but THERE IS NO DOUBT

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region.
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

Who is this 'we' ? Is this all Democrats? All Senators ? Maybe its ALL AMERICANS

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

I'll be damned..its another Democrat that KNOWS, and its WE AGAIN....does this mean EVERYBODY KNOWS ?

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is useing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

And again...its another Democrat that says we KNOW...we KNOW NOW and HAVE KNOWN FOR MANY YEARS

We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

Then we have this Democrat that is CONFIDENT (look it up)
being confident, Sen. Byrd didn't say "somewhat confident" or "fairly confident" did he? He must be "damn sure" if hes 'confident'.....it means the same thing

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

And then its "UNMISTAKABLE EVIDENCE from this Democrat..."unmistakable...meaning THERE IS NO MISTAKE...sounds like there is "no doubt" if he can claim "there is no mistake"

Yes, hack....words do have meaning....its plain and simple English that is used here....unambiguous words that only have one meaning in the context they are used in...

unmistakable

confident

know

have known

no doubt

unambiguous meanings
......... but again I tire of your childish parsing and spinning of plain English to defend your narrow-minded views....YOU ARE A HACK, that too, is unambiguous ,...you made a fool of yourself years ago with this inane argument and continue to make a fool of yourself now ...

no doubt this crap works for you and your fellow hacks, but not to logical, open minded thinkers..

You torture the language as badly as Clinton giving a sworn deposition

 

[Epicurus]

if you are under oath, and the lawyer asks how tall you are and you say 5"9 instead of 5'7, it is not material, and is not, therefore, perjury. Clinton's little lie was not material and was certainly not deserving of impeachment, imo.

was I PLEASED that he was unfaithful to his wife in the Oval Office and then lied about it? absolutely not. I was disgusted. What disgusted me much more was the incredible waste that was the Iraq war, the incredible loss of blood and treasure, and the hypocrisy of the right in their unflagging support for it.

That has absolutely nothing to do with the issue.

What the fuck is wrong with liberals on this site? They are absolutely incapable of maintaining a single line of discussion.

 

[maineman]

Indeed...words do have meanings

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,)

Not we suspect, not we think, not we imagine, but THERE IS NO DOUBT

reinvigorating weapons programs is not synonymous with stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. sorry.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region.
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

Who is this 'we' ? Is this all Democrats? All Senators ? Maybe its ALL AMERICANS

"belief" is not synonymous with absolute certainty. sorry.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

I'll be damned..its another Democrat that KNOWS, and its WE AGAIN....does this mean EVERYBODY KNOWS ?

Gore was wrong, just like Bush was wrong...and if Gore had won the election in 2000 and had invaded Iraq on the same shoddy evidence as Bush did, I would have vehemently opposed THAT as well. next.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is useing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

And again...its another Democrat that says we KNOW...we KNOW NOW and HAVE KNOWN FOR MANY YEARS

still no statement of absolute certainty regarding stockpiles of WMD's. sorry.

We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

Then we have this Democrat that is CONFIDENT (look it up)
being confident, Sen. Byrd didn't say "somewhat confident" or "fairly confident" did he? He must be "damn sure" if hes 'confident'.....it means the same thing

"confidence" is not synonymous with absolute certainty. sorry.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

And then its "UNMISTAKABLE EVIDENCE from this Democrat..."unmistakable...meaning THERE IS NO MISTAKE...sounds like there is "no doubt" if he can claim "there is no mistake"

working to develop is not synonymous with having large stockpiles of WMD's. sorry.

Yes, words do have meaning...

damn right they do. And nobody other than Al Gore said anything that expressed absolute certainty of the existence of stockpiles of WMD's... and THAT, along with the bogus connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda, was the reason why George Bush claimed he couldn't wait for the weapons inspectors - who he had succeeded in getting back INTO Iraq - to tell the world what we now know: that Saddam did NOT have stockpiles of WMD's that he could give to Al Qaeda at a moment's notice and therefore, there was no need to invade, conquer and occupy Iraq in order to disarm him of weapons he did not possess in the first place.

 

[maineman]

That has absolutely nothing to do with the issue.

What the fuck is wrong with liberals on this site? They are absolutely incapable of maintaining a single line of discussion.

of course it does. It speaks volumes as to the hypocrisy of the right.