Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
For a libertarian, you're awfully statist.
Your defense of the fucking Russians is noted. Why do you think I'm statist?
For a libertarian, you're awfully statist.
Comrade, it's the other way around: Russia has too many conflicts with the United States of America.this is old, and we have had way too many conflicts with Russia ( proof the notifications dont always work)
but it's the basis of mutual air power ops in Syria
~~
US, Russia To Deconflict in Syria
https://www.defensenews.com/congress/budget/2015/09/29/us-russia-to-deconflict-in-syria/
STFU.. idiot. a conflict is between 2 parties in this case of the US and Russia and Syria.Russia has too many conflicts with the United States of America.
STFU.. idiot. a conflict is between 2 parties in this case of the US and Russia and Syria.
I'm not even going into the fact Syria is a long time Russian client state -
it would confuse your already addled delusions
moron. it's called "geopolitics"Make me, Comrade anatta. I know you've tried, but as usual, you always fail just like your beloved Russia.
Funny how you condemn the United States for their international relations yet you staunchly defend Russia's interference in the ME with "client state" bullshit......or is that bullshitski?
childishMake me, Comrade anatta.
Bitch, whine and moan all you like, comrade, but your defense of Mother Russia is clear for all to see. Clearly you put Russian interests over American interests.moron. it's called "geopolitics"
Syria is not the entire ME -but Syria is a Russian client state.
The US has much more sway in the Gulf states/Israel/KSA and to an extent Egypt,although Russia has been making advances with both since Obama stupidly put sanctions on Egypt
childish
trollish blather.Bitch, whine and moan all you like, comrade, but your defense of Mother Russia is clear for all to see. Clearly you put Russian interests over American interests.
If you are a Russian agent, that's expected. If you are an American committing treason by supporting Russia, that too is expected, but will be handled differently.
So you're an interventionist? Personally, I don't think we should get involved in most foreign conflicts. Also, as far as ISIS goes, they would have never risen in power as much as they did had we not supported the rebels in Syria. Assad could have easily crushed the insurgency and ISIS if we had let Russia, Iran, and Assad fight them without funding and arming the rebels.
And we funded and armed rebels that also killed lots of women and children. War is hell. No side is innocent.
damn you are dumb..again..it never ends with you.
They would inform the US - they are called deconfliction procedures.
The US and Russia use the same procedures in Syria.
Once notified, if the US forces were still engages - even by accident- Turkey would say "well we told you"
And you'd be screaming your dumb ass off that Trump got us killed in Syria
STFU.. idiot.
ROFLMAO. You are so stupid that you are funny.moron......childish
in the interest of time i'll ignore the rest of your blithering, and focus on where you actually pose a question.I am going to ask you as I do so many of your kind, do you work at being stupid, or is it just natural for you to be so?
But tell us dumb f**k, if the US had not left do you really think that Turkey would have been stupid enough to risk going to war with us? But you see fool, there is this thing called "HONOR" which asses like you know nothing of. In the military there is a saying "leave no one behind". That is HONOR. And it applies to all, not just the military. And we either honor that commitment, or we ignore it.
in the interest of time i'll ignore the rest of your blithering, and focus on where you actually pose a question.
~~
I just gave you how de-confliction procedures work, and how they are already used in Syria between US Air and Russia
Do you at least get the idea they would have been used the same manner between Turkey and the USA??
got that much?
so if de-confliction was used -and it would have - why would Turkey not have gone in under that auspice?
Erdogan did warn Trump -he didn't ask permission but he DID WARN
He would have used the SAME WARNING (deconfliction) if we had stayed, and then gone in
Yes he would have gone in under de-confliction procedures -and that isn't even taking into account Erdogan
answers to no one - much less a request from the USA
that's paywalled or requires a registration.Love it when you confuse reality with the fantasy world a wannabe intellect ( https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...prevent-risk-of-a-us-russian-clash-over-syria ) like you speaks up, and ignores the point of a post. And that point is one of "HONOR" which you obviously have no use for as your gawd trump has no use for.
there is not one damn honorable thing about being killed in Syria"HONOR"
that's paywalled or requires a registration.
I didn't particularly say "deconfliction" works (effective) -in fact I mentioned it's far from perfect.
But de-confliction IS the procedure used in Syria, and clearly would have been used between Turkey and the USA
as Ergodan went in with or without us there.
weird/ now I cliked on it and i see the whole article. Just WTF is your point here?Enough lies from the treasonous one who lacks anything resembling honor, or integrity.
No registration is required, and no mention of any imperfections in the "de-confliction" fantasy.
Make America Mediocre Again.
The country asked for it.
Your defense of the fucking Russians is noted. Why do you think I'm statist?