Less than 50K separate Biden/Trump in PA, Fraud does not need to be "widespread"

Damocles said:
These links are live updated so totals may change over time...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/pa/president/

Currently per RCP (link above), less than 50K votes separate the two candidates in PA, it would not take "widespread" or "systemic" fraud to overturn an election result with so few votes separating the candidates.

Current vote separation is: 49,153

And in GA the difference is much smaller: 12,651 votes separating the candidates.
Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/ga/president/

Arizona is still counting, and the vote difference there is: 14,733 as I type this post.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/az/president/

This idea that fraud or irregularities would have to be "widespread" when so few votes separate the two is simply untrue and an attempt to disregard evidence. It would not take "widespread" fraud or irregularities so large to be called "widespread" to change the result.
Click to expand...

That's a big difference from the other night.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Dude, you're missing the entire point. That's just an opinion article about "what could be". It's bullshit since those seven counties aren't determining the election. Trump can win Pennsylvania and still lose to Biden due to either Arizona or Georgia.

Which counties would have been predictable there 6 months ago?

Something missing from this discussion is the important of polls. Political campaigns use polls to target key areas be they states or cities. It's clearly not financially doable to target every county in America.
Click to expand...
What if Trump has Arizona and Georgia?
Like he does.
 
tsuke said:
Im not just saying anecdotal things. Heres the story

https://www.dailywire.com/news/repu...tch-fixed-officials-urge-confidence-in-system

Republican in Michigan goes from losing by 100 to winning by 1000. Id wager those votes swung from Biden to Trump as well as a lot of people vote straight ticket.

Just one example of a race that changed because we are doing the due diligence right now.

Deny it if you want but there is documented proof like this that the "glitches" are actually affecting results.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't we be doing due diligence in every election? Why should this election be different?
 
CharacterAssassin said:
The only problem being, of course, is that there is no credible evidence of any fraud.

Say it with me: President Elect Joe Biden.

Good to see you in such pain and desperation.
Click to expand...
Remember this what I'm telling you right now before you go making any lists and acting on them.
We are the ones clinging to our guns, God, and The Bible.
We have all the ammo and food, too. The only thing keeping us from killing you is us.
My prediction: You'll be starving in about 1 year due to Biden/Harris policies and we will feed you.
Whether you realize your folly is irrelevant. We won't let you starve.
Holy fuck we're pushovers. :( Eh, it is what it is. I don't want to see Americans starving.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Have the results been called? If not, $50 bet Trump doesn't win both Arizona and Georgia as you are claiming.
Click to expand...

How about signature for 1 month? Cool? If I lose, I wear what you want, if you lose, you wear what I want.

Credit to Toro for coming up with that..it's pretty cool.
1 month signature picking to the winner.
 
Matt Dillon said:
How about signature for 1 month? Cool? If I lose, I wear what you want, if you lose, you wear what I want.

Credit to Toro for coming up with that..it's pretty cool.
1 month signature picking to the winner.
Click to expand...

Didn't you run from a similar bet on another thread?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Didn't you run from a similar bet on another thread?
Click to expand...

No, not at all. As a matter of fact I wore an "Obama is the greatest pres of all time" sig for 1 month.

I bet you do not have the balls it takes to follow through. 'Sup, bitch?
You don't have the balls to do something I did a couple years ago, bitchboi.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
I prefer he not give a concession, more proof he is a stone cold loser.
Click to expand...

It would be a good bet he never will. At best "the Trump administration" will have some flunky give one or just text it.

It's another good bet Trump will be a no-show at the Inauguration, smiling and shaking hands like all past elections.
 
Matt Dillon said:
No, not at all. As a matter of fact I wore an "Obama is the greatest pres of all time" sig for 1 month.

I bet you do not have the balls it takes to follow through. 'Sup, bitch?
You don't have the balls to do something I did a couple years ago, bitchboi.
Click to expand...

Name the bet. Single sentence, normal size, no restrictions on anything else just like you ran from before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top