Less than 50K separate Biden/Trump in PA, Fraud does not need to be "widespread"

Damocles

Damocles

Accedo!
Staff member
Less than 50K separate Biden/Trump in PA, Fraud does not need to be "widespread"

These links are live updated so totals may change over time...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/pa/president/

Currently per RCP (link above), less than 50K votes separate the two candidates in PA, it would not take "widespread" or "systemic" fraud to overturn an election result with so few votes separating the candidates.

Current vote separation is: 49,153

And in GA the difference is much smaller: 12,651 votes separating the candidates.
Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/ga/president/

Arizona is still counting, and the vote difference there is: 14,733 as I type this post.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/az/president/

This idea that fraud or irregularities would have to be "widespread" when so few votes separate the two is simply untrue and an attempt to disregard evidence. It would not take "widespread" fraud or irregularities so large to be called "widespread" to change the result.
 
Damocles said:
These links are live updated so totals may change over time...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/pa/president/

Currently per RCP (link above), less than 50K votes separate the two candidates in PA, it would not take "widespread" or "systemic" fraud to overturn an election result with so few votes separating the candidates.

Current vote separation is: 49,153

And in GA the difference is much smaller: 12,651 votes separating the candidates.
Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/ga/president/

Arizona is still counting, and the vote difference there is: 14,733 as I type this post.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/az/president/

This idea that fraud or irregularities would have to be "widespread" when so few votes separate the two is simply untrue and an attempt to disregard evidence. It would not take "widespread" fraud or irregularities so large to be called "widespread" to change the result.
Click to expand...

The only problem being, of course, is that there is no credible evidence of any fraud.

Say it with me: President Elect Joe Biden.

Good to see you in such pain and desperation.
 
Damocles said:
These links are live updated so totals may change over time...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/pa/president/

Currently per RCP (link above), less than 50K votes separate the two candidates in PA, it would not take "widespread" or "systemic" fraud to overturn an election result with so few votes separating the candidates.

Current vote separation is: 49,153

And in GA the difference is much smaller: 12,651 votes separating the candidates.
Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/ga/president/

Arizona is still counting, and the vote difference there is: 14,733 as I type this post.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/az/president/

This idea that fraud or irregularities would have to be "widespread" when so few votes separate the two is simply untrue and an attempt to disregard evidence. It would not take "widespread" fraud or irregularities so large to be called "widespread" to change the result.
Click to expand...

Even so, faking even 100 votes would be hard to do much less 12,000. Biden is ahead in each state. It would take more cheating than Trump or anyone else can do to flip both states.

All Biden has to do is win AZ, GA or PA to win. Trump needs several of them. Notice no one is whining about North Carolina because Trump is ahead there.
 
The conspiracy nuts are working hard to overthrow an election. it was predicted that Trump would do this. he is a man with no values. I am shocked to see all the Trump ass kissers.
 
And the fraud need not be widespread as its limited to large population centers where its easier to conceal.

If you're not sloppy.

But this go round they got very sloppy.
 
Celticguy said:
And the fraud need not be widespread as its limited to large population centers where its easier to conceal.

If you're not sloppy.

But this go round they got very sloppy.
Click to expand...

How many hundreds of thousands of votes would it take to garner 270 electoral votes?

Where is the sloppiness? Is there evidence of fraud in a single city or county? Much less across the country?
 
Nordberg said:
The conspiracy nuts are working hard to overthrow an election. it was predicted that Trump would do this. he is a man with no values. I am shocked to see all the Trump ass kissers.
Click to expand...

Yes, but in Washington DC even the Republicans know who the conspiracy nuts are.

It's like controlling a two-year old; sometimes it's just best to let them run around until they tire themselves out and can be put to bed.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
How many hundreds of thousands of votes would it take to garner 270 electoral votes?

Where is the sloppiness? Is there evidence of fraud in a single city or county? Much less across the country?
Click to expand...

8000 in a swing state would be enough.

Just a little throwing out here, and a little letting go there..

Some blank ballots with nothing but Biden checked..
 
Matt Dillon said:
8000 in a swing state would be enough.

Just a little throwing out here, and a little letting go there..

Some blank ballots with nothing but Biden checked..
Click to expand...

Go for it. Give Trump Pennsylvania and Georgia, let Biden have Arizona and call it a day. Deal?
 
Damocles said:
These links are live updated so totals may change over time...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/pa/president/

Currently per RCP (link above), less than 50K votes separate the two candidates in PA, it would not take "widespread" or "systemic" fraud to overturn an election result with so few votes separating the candidates.

Current vote separation is: 49,153

And in GA the difference is much smaller: 12,651 votes separating the candidates.
Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/ga/president/

Arizona is still counting, and the vote difference there is: 14,733 as I type this post.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/az/president/

This idea that fraud or irregularities would have to be "widespread" when so few votes separate the two is simply untrue and an attempt to disregard evidence. It would not take "widespread" fraud or irregularities so large to be called "widespread" to change the result.
Click to expand...

How would you know that? 12k votes is pretty large amount. How would the fraud work to give a candidate a 12k advantage? Do you have any examples of past voter fraud to reference? Have you actually worked in the election process? I have so I don't think you have enough info or data to make that charge unless you can present some. Otherwise, I call bullshit.
 
Damocles said:
These links are live updated so totals may change over time...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/pa/president/

Currently per RCP (link above), less than 50K votes separate the two candidates in PA, it would not take "widespread" or "systemic" fraud to overturn an election result with so few votes separating the candidates.

Current vote separation is: 49,153

And in GA the difference is much smaller: 12,651 votes separating the candidates.
Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/ga/president/

Arizona is still counting, and the vote difference there is: 14,733 as I type this post.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/az/president/

This idea that fraud or irregularities would have to be "widespread" when so few votes separate the two is simply untrue and an attempt to disregard evidence. It would not take "widespread" fraud or irregularities so large to be called "widespread" to change the result.
Click to expand...

No recount will change a thing. President-elect Biden
 
A 50K vote margin requires quite a bit of fraud going on in pretty big amounts. It's usually less than 10K, at the most, that is moving into the realm of fraud changing outcomes.
 
Celticguy said:
And the fraud need not be widespread as its limited to large population centers where its easier to conceal.

If you're not sloppy.

But this go round they got very sloppy.
Click to expand...

Want to bet your future participation on this forum on the winner?

Naw, I thought not.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
How many hundreds of thousands of votes would it take to garner 270 electoral votes?

Where is the sloppiness? Is there evidence of fraud in a single city or county? Much less across the country?
Click to expand...

You are, of course, familiar with the notion of battleground states and if you are you will know that it comes down to a handful of counties.
So the wide is not that wide unless you seek to tip a state against the will of the high population centers.

Denying observers, against state supreme court orders and state law would have to be considered sloppy by any point of view.
 
Damocles said:
These links are live updated so totals may change over time...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/pa/president/

Currently per RCP (link above), less than 50K votes separate the two candidates in PA, it would not take "widespread" or "systemic" fraud to overturn an election result with so few votes separating the candidates.

Current vote separation is: 49,153

And in GA the difference is much smaller: 12,651 votes separating the candidates.
Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/ga/president/

Arizona is still counting, and the vote difference there is: 14,733 as I type this post.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/live_results/2020/state/az/president/

This idea that fraud or irregularities would have to be "widespread" when so few votes separate the two is simply untrue and an attempt to disregard evidence. It would not take "widespread" fraud or irregularities so large to be called "widespread" to change the result.
Click to expand...

Wolf cries don't work. Trump was literally making wolf cries before they even had any sheep. Anyone that buys this fraud shtick is just another Trump cult drone believing their high-lord over the experts once again.
 
Celticguy said:
You are, of course, familiar with the notion of battleground states and if you are you will know that it comes down to a handful of counties.
So the wide is not that wide unless you seek to tip a state against the will of the high population centers.

Denying observers, against state supreme court orders and state law would have to be considered sloppy by any point of view.
Click to expand...

Want to bet your future participation on this forum on the winner?

Naw, I thought not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top