C
Cancel3
Guest
No, that was Paul.
You do know that Paul wasn't around with Jesus, right?
No, that was Paul.
THere are more than just two canidates.
true but only 2 viable ones.
OH here comes another wing nut telling us about the Glory and the Wonders of Supply Side Jesus. GIVE ME A BREAK!!
No, you're one of the reactionary wing nut Bush supporters who landed us in this mess. We want you punished. We dont' want a balance of power with Democrats. Republicans have prove themselves so untrustworthy of the publics support that we want Democrats in charge of all branches of the national government so that they can punish Republicans.
If your a Republican you had better learn this word today "REFORM"!
Todays election is a referendum against Republican extremism, narrow mindedness, divisiveness and failed policies.
Until the Republican party reforms itself a Republican will have a hard time getting elected dog catcher.
I just wonder what would be wrong with the republican party being the party of Eisenhower again. Why does the Republican party think it is the business of government to save our souls by being against gay marriage, and abortion? Why can't the Republican party be the party of small government, low taxes and staying out of peoples lives in GENERAL? If they did that they would never lose another election and the Dems would become the party of the opposition forever. WHY does the party feel the need to be the evangelical party? The Party of Christ?Yep exactly, "Let's punish the Republicans!", and turn a blind eye to the fact that the Dems have been WORSE on proposing and voting for more spending.
I just wonder what would be wrong with the republican party being the party of Eisenhower again. Why does the Republican party think it is the business of government to save our souls by being against gay marriage, and abortion? Why can't the Republican party be the party of small government, low taxes and staying out of peoples lives in GENERAL? If they did that they would never lose another election and the Dems would become the party of the opposition forever. WHY does the party feel the need to be the evangelical party? The Party of Christ?
nope. Well Obama comes the closest, but still not too impressed.Sure but if you dont like the viable ones, you should still vote. There has to be one close to your liking.
I just wonder what would be wrong with the republican party being the party of Eisenhower again. Why does the Republican party think it is the business of government to save our souls by being against gay marriage, and abortion? Why can't the Republican party be the party of small government, low taxes and staying out of peoples lives in GENERAL? If they did that they would never lose another election and the Dems would become the party of the opposition forever. WHY does the party feel the need to be the evangelical party? The Party of Christ?
It is hard to create enthusiasm with a platform like that. Fanatics want a crusade and somebody to blame. And without fanatics you have to actually produce results and can't get away with ripping people off. So the parties create cult like obedience so they can continue their crimes.
I agree with everything here, but if the Republicans did what I suggest, they wouldn't need fanatics anymore. They would have well reasoned members of their party that demanded results and maybe, just maybe, they would produce them.It is hard to create enthusiasm with a platform like that. Fanatics want a crusade and somebody to blame. And without fanatics you have to actually produce results and can't get away with ripping people off. So the parties create cult like obedience so they can continue their crimes.
Do you think Eisenhower or the Dems were FOR gay marriage or abortion in the 1950's?I just wonder what would be wrong with the republican party being the party of Eisenhower again. Why does the Republican party think it is the business of government to save our souls by being against gay marriage, and abortion?
I dunno, I once believed this, I hope you're right, when you look at demographics the fastest growing voting group is Hispanics and they tend to be socially Conservatives and economically Liberal (with the exception of Cuban ones in Florida), so I think this is why both parties are trending to be more authoritarian.Why can't the Republican party be the party of small government, low taxes and staying out of peoples lives in GENERAL? If they did that they would never lose another election and the Dems would become the party of the opposition forever.
There is some truth in that, most people need something to hate, the default is that ends up being the rich unless some other substitution is viable.It is hard to create enthusiasm with a platform like that. Fanatics want a crusade and somebody to blame. And without fanatics you have to actually produce results and can't get away with ripping people off. So the parties create cult like obedience so they can continue their crimes.
I agree with everything here, but if the Republicans did what I suggest, they wouldn't need fanatics anymore. They would have well reasoned members of their party that demanded results and maybe, just maybe, they would produce them.
There is some truth in that, most people need something to hate, the default is that ends up being the rich unless some other substitution is viable.
There is some truth in that, most people need something to hate, the default is that ends up being the rich unless some other substitution is viable.